Panther Leader: Blacks Need to Migrate to Five Southern States, Form Country Within a Country
Breitbart ^ | July 10,2016 | by AARON KLEIN
Omowale was speaking in an interview set to air Sunday night on this reporters talk radio program, Aaron Klein Investigative Radio, broadcast on New Yorks AM 970 The Answer and News Talk 990 AM in Philadelphia.
Omowale used the interview to claim five states as belonging to the Black Nation: Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, and Georgia.
The revolutionary stated: We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So its not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.
Omowale is also co-founder of the Huey P. Newton Gun Club, a black militant gun group named after Black Panther Party founder Huey P. Newton. According to reports, Dallas shooter Micah X. Johnson liked the Huey P. Newton Gun Club and Omawale has said that he recognized Johnson from black community events in Dallas.
Asked by this reporter what his groups endgame is, Omowale replied:
The end game is land ownership. The endgame is our own government in a nation within a nation. Okay. So we claim the states of Louisiana, we claim the states of Mississippi, we claim the states of South Carolina, we claim the states of Alabama, and we claim the states of Georgia.
We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So its not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.
(Excerpt) Read more at http://breitbart.com ..
#1: rlk To: tpaine (#0)
Blacks need to migrate back to Africa where every God damned one of them would be received as a potentate.
rlk posted on 2016-07-10 20:27:59 Reply Private Reply
#2: tpaine To: rlk (#1)
tpaine posted on 2016-07-10 20:52:02 Reply Private Reply
#3: Roscoe To: rlk (#1)
Roscoe posted on 2016-07-10 21:04:56 Reply Private Reply
#4: paraclete To: rlk (#1)
They tried that, it's called Liberia and it is a failed state, proving that they might not be good at governing themselves
paraclete posted on 2016-07-10 21:20:51 Reply Private Reply
#5: paraclete To: tpaine (#0)
It's a good plan, move all the poverty and misery to one place where it is hot and steamy and you can just take your ease, then all the cops would be black and they would have no excuse for shooting black men.
Is it possible that not only would the white people move out, they would take their industries with them, then Washington could do a NAFTA and employ them on slave wages.
paraclete posted on 2016-07-10 21:25:27 Reply Private Reply
#6: tpaine To: paraclete (#4)
And two bits if they were able to take over some States, they're end up like Haiti.
tpaine posted on 2016-07-10 21:25:41 Reply Private Reply
#7: jeremiad To: tpaine (#0)
How long until a protest march will have to have the same protection for the police as a visit by a high government official? I predict they will be locking down tall buildings, placing SWAT teams in sniper positions etc, just to keep the police on the ground feeling safe enough to go to work.
jeremiad posted on 2016-07-10 22:35:55 Reply Private Reply
#8: rlk To: paraclete (#4)
The basic problem with Liberia is that they did't have enough of them over there to do the job properly. Send them all over there with a check for $1,000 in their hands along with Omama and Hillary to lead them by giving inspiring speeches and in six months you'd have a major economic center of the world maintained by a population of geniuses.
rlk posted on 2016-07-11 00:45:34 Reply Private Reply
#9: nolu chan To: paraclete (#5)
They could start with a major city, say Detroit, the capital of the auto industry. White people would move out, Blacks would take over government, and they could have a major industrial paradise with all those good jobs.
nolu chan posted on 2016-07-11 01:08:36 Reply Private Reply
#10: goldilucky To: paraclete (#5)
I'm to assume by reading this that you infer poverty to be just a black issue and that were they to move to some segregated area, the rest of the nation would be just fine? If this is so, you are sadly mistaken and have not visited skid row lately in modern-day America. Poverty is live and well in America regardless of one's skin color. And NAFTA is to blame for this not black people.
goldilucky posted on 2016-07-11 01:49:01 Reply Private Reply
#11: paraclete To: goldilucky (#10)
never said black people were to blame. look multiculturism has been proven not to work in any form, therefore establishing a place for black people isn't a bad idea and there are others you might want to move to their own area. Poverty is an issue of a society that doesn't take responsibility for those that have been left behind. there are lots of people in this world who don't fit modern society for various reasons
However you cannot implement a plan like this and expect things to remain the same, industries will move, looking for that pool of skills and willingness to work. China has managed to drag a lot of people out of poverty but it has been at the cost of others, lots of lost opportunity
paraclete posted on 2016-07-11 02:43:22 Reply Private Reply
#12: paraclete To: rlk (#8)
Dream on. People who have made it arn't going to go, and $1000 wouldn't last anyone long when you have to find accomodation and a place in a hell hole like Liberia. Most of Africa is a basket case, why would you want to send people there
paraclete posted on 2016-07-11 02:47:12 Reply Private Reply
#13: BobCeleste To: tpaine (#0)
nope, ain't gonna happen.
you want your own country?
Go to Africa and take one over.
Bye.
BobCeleste posted on 2016-07-11 08:28:02 Reply Private Reply
#14: TrappedInMd To: nolu chan (#9)
HAHA, best comment on this thread!
TrappedInMd posted on 2016-07-11 08:38:08 Reply Private Reply
#15: misterwhite To: rlk (#1)
Blacks need to migrate back to Africa where every God damned one of them thinks they're a potentate.
misterwhite posted on 2016-07-11 08:47:34 Reply Private Reply
#16: paraclete To: TrappedInMd (#14)
paraclete posted on 2016-07-11 08:49:35 Reply Private Reply
#17: misterwhite To: nolu chan (#9)
You're thinking too small.
They could take over South Africa, steal the white farms, whites would move out, and blacks would prosper.
misterwhite posted on 2016-07-11 08:53:03 Reply Private Reply
#18: paraclete To: misterwhite (#17)
Seem to remember that has been tried, you have heard of Zimbabwe?, the basket case economy of Africa, run by blacks with those same ideas, and how is South Africa going these days? Founded with the same ideals.
The idea is sound, people need their own space, the mormoms did it and prospered, mind you they didn't have any black people to help them along
paraclete posted on 2016-07-11 10:22:26 Reply Private Reply
#19: rlk To: paraclete (#12)
To get them the hell out of here and away from me!
rlk posted on 2016-07-11 12:24:21 Reply Private Reply
#20: nolu chan To: paraclete, TrappedInMd (#16)
The decline of Detroit preceded the rush to Mexico. Asian manufacturers (Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, etc.) came in and established factories in the USA and produced better, cheaper cars than what Detroit was pushing out. Detroit was still a major asset when White-flight started.
nolu chan posted on 2016-07-11 13:47:45 Reply Private Reply
#21: nolu chan To: rlk, paraclete (#8)
The basic problem with the colonization of Liberia was the almost total lack of support, and just dropping off people in what was, to them, a totally foreign land. Africa is over nine times the size of the USA. The people dropped off either had lost their native tongue or where in a new and distant place where it was not spoken. It was a disorganized mess.
It was poorly styled after the British equivalent of Sierra Leone where the British relocated their loyal freedmen. The capital is Freetown. Liberia's capital is Monrovia after President James Monroe.
The colonization movement started before the civil war when a younger Lincoln was a Whig and an officer of the African Colonization Society. Lincoln actively pursued colonization up until about the day he died.
nolu chan posted on 2016-07-11 13:58:35 Reply Private Reply
#22: Stoner To: tpaine (#2)
The Cajuns will just use them for gator bait.
Stoner posted on 2016-07-11 16:13:34 Reply Private Reply
#23: goldilucky To: paraclete (#11)
Poverty has become the very issue of this nation because of industries who opt to move their business looking for cheap labor; not unwillingness to work. We've got illegals in this country that are unwilling to work unless they are represented by unions and labor representatives for their own interests. That still does not resolve the poverty issue concerning the remaining percentage of people unemployed and homeless because the pool of skills has been transferred over to a certain type of people regardless of those same skills. And I do not expect things to fare any better for this nation. Things are not so rosy these days.
goldilucky posted on 2016-07-11 16:41:17 Reply Private Reply
#24: paraclete To: goldilucky (#23)
paraclete posted on 2016-07-11 18:14:12 Reply Private Reply
#25: paraclete To: nolu chan (#21)
and both are model societies, that is a model of what bright ideas and aparteid will bring you. there is no doubt that races need their own space but that leaves a problem. To go back to the theme of this thread, ask yourself, how well did the native americans do on the reservation? this idea is just an extension of that thinking. You want people to migrate, give them free land, opportunity
paraclete posted on 2016-07-11 18:34:21 Reply Private Reply
#26: rlk To: paraclete (#25)
What percentage of American Indians do you think are still on the reservation today?
rlk posted on 2016-07-12 04:53:05 Reply Private Reply
#27: Stoner To: rlk (#1)
Funny, but true !
Stoner posted on 2016-07-12 09:46:04 Reply Private Reply