11 Dallas Officers Shot, 3 Dead in Shooting as Protest Ended

Source: NBC News
Published: Jul 8, 2016
Author: Phil Helsel
Post Date: 2016-07-08 00:22:19 by Roscoe
Views: 28410

Eleven Dallas law enforcement officers were shot, three fatally, by what is believed to be two snipers who opened fire during a demonstration downtown over recent police shootings in Minnesota and Louisiana, the Dallas police chief said.

The snipers fired from an elevated positions on police officers minutes before 9 p.m., Dallas Police Chief David Brown told reporters.

"We believe that these suspects were positioning themselves in a way to triangulate on these officers from two different perches in garages in the downtown area, and planned to injure and kill as many law enforcement officers as they could," he said. Some were shot in the back.

Three of the 11 officers died, two are in surgery and three are in critical condition, Brown said.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply

#103: Deckard    To: Roscoe (#102)

Deadly force voucher fraud.

If there's a bustle in your hedgerow, don’t be alarmed now its just a spring clean for the May Queen

CopBlock. Alrighty then.

No, Third Rail News.

Learn to read.

Deckard posted on 2016-07-08 19:52:54   Reply   Private Reply

#104: Roscoe    To: Deckard (#103)

No, Third Rail News.

Learn to read.

First line in your article:

"If you don’t already, you should follow CopBlock on Facebook."

[snigger]

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-08 20:06:19   Reply   Private Reply

#105: Deckard    To: Roscoe (#104)

First line in your article:

Cop Block isn't the source for the article, they were linked in the story.

This internet thingie a little confusing for you?

Deckard posted on 2016-07-08 20:15:10   Reply   Private Reply

#106: Roscoe    To: Deckard (#105)

Cop Block isn't the source for the article

Squirmy. The article offered it as a source.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-08 21:23:44   Reply   Private Reply

#107: Deckard    To: Roscoe (#106)

Getting a little tired of your games.

We're done here.

Deckard posted on 2016-07-08 21:51:00   Reply   Private Reply

#108: Roscoe    To: Deckard (#107)

You took your whipping like a cuck.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-08 21:57:50   Reply   Private Reply

#109: Deckard    To: Roscoe (#108)

You took your whipping like a cuck.

Delusional as usual.

Effing troll.

Deckard posted on 2016-07-08 22:08:11   Reply   Private Reply

#110: buckeroo    To: Deckard (#109)

"roscoe" has always been a troll; ever since 1998 on JR's FR forum.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-08 22:17:44   Reply   Private Reply

#111: Roscoe    To: Deckard (#107)

We're done here.

You'll come crawling back for more punishment.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-08 22:23:23   Reply   Private Reply

#112: Roscoe    To: Deckard (#109)

Effing

See?

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-08 22:23:50   Reply   Private Reply

#113: Pinguinite    To: buckeroo (#110)

"roscoe" has always been a troll; ever since 1998 on JR's FR forum.

Sure is acting like one here.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-08 23:52:02   Reply   Private Reply

#114: goldilucky    To: Roscoe (#94)

I read the article you posted. But the point in mine posting that video was to inquire several things: 1) Everybody commenting on that video from that site, seems to want to discredit the woman. But my question is, where is that officer's body camera to dispute what she recorded? (2) The cop pulled the couple over for one thing which was a broken tail light. So why did the officer use such brazen moves to get her fiance to turn over his id? It's insane just watching what that officer did.

goldilucky posted on 2016-07-09 02:14:21   Reply   Private Reply

#115: Pinguinite    To: goldilucky (#114)

But my question is, where is that officer's body camera to dispute what she recorded? (2) The cop pulled the couple over for one thing which was a broken tail light. So why did the officer use such brazen moves to get her fiance to turn over his id? It's insane just watching what that officer did.

I read somewhere that Wisconsin police don't have body cams. At least not yet.

In comparison with the woman who in initially very stoic, the cop seems to be in a state of hysteria.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 03:36:51   Reply   Private Reply

#116: Roscoe    To: goldilucky (#114)

I read the article you posted. But the point in mine posting that video was to inquire several things: 1) Everybody commenting on that video from that site, seems to want to discredit the woman. But my question is, where is that officer's body camera to dispute what she recorded?

From the article that I posted that you read: "St. Anthony Police Officers don’t wear body cameras."

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 06:25:00   Reply   Private Reply

#117: misterwhite    To: Pinguinite (#115)

"I read somewhere that Wisconsin police don't have body cams. At least not yet."

That may be true, but this took place in Minnesota.

Speaking of cameras, do you find it odd that she started recording after the shots? Could it be there's more video before the shots which would negate her story and justify the shooting?

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 08:36:04   Reply   Private Reply

#118: misterwhite    To: Roscoe (#116)

I believe there was another officer on the passenger side of the car. I'd be interested in his story.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 08:37:35   Reply   Private Reply

#119: Stoner    To: Roscoe (#90)

That looks like a fine upstanding citizen /SARC

Stoner posted on 2016-07-09 09:46:07   Reply   Private Reply

#120: Pinguinite    To: misterwhite (#117)

That may be true, but this took place in Minnesota.

Then I'll amend to say the state where the incident took place does not have body cams for police.

Speaking of cameras, do you find it odd that she started recording after the shots?

No, it is not "odd" at all. Until shots were fired, there would have been minimal reason to record anything.

Could it be there's more video before the shots which would negate her story and justify the shooting?

The possibilities are endless, aren't they? Except that if the guy wanted to do a shootout with the cop who stopped him for a broken tail light with his 4 year old in the back seat, and his girlfriend in the passenger seat, he'd need a pretty good motive.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 10:45:22   Reply   Private Reply

#121: misterwhite    To: Pinguinite (#120)

"with his 4 year old in the back seat, and his girlfriend in the passenger seat"

From what I've read elsewhere, I'm not sure it's his 4-year-old or his girlfriend.

Be that as it may, certainly if she started recording as soon as they were pulled over -- and if her story was true -- it would be damning evidence against the police version of events, right? What possible good is a video after the shots were fired?

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 11:00:45   Reply   Private Reply

#122: Pinguinite    To: misterwhite (#121)

certainly if she started recording as soon as they were pulled over -- and if her story was true -- it would be damning evidence against the police version of events, right?

Your powers of deduction are incredible.

What possible good is a video after the shots were fired?

Well it does show the cop in a state of hysteria, screaming and such, while she remained respectful and calm. It also shows the cop not seeking to administer first aid to try to save the guy, and not immediately calling for an ambulance.

All in all, the cop seems very...... paranoid.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 11:09:53   Reply   Private Reply

#123: misterwhite    To: Pinguinite (#122)

"All in all, the cop seems very...... paranoid."

It's not paranoia if they're really after you. If you're any example, this cop will be lucky if he keeps his job.

His "side bitch" is calm because she knows she'll continue to get her welfare, housing and food stamps.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 11:33:09   Reply   Private Reply

#124: Pinguinite    To: misterwhite (#123)

It's not paranoia if they're really after you. If you're any example, this cop will be lucky if he keeps his job.

Oh, he'll probably not be criminally penalized or fired, because there are no body cams or audio recordings to back up the woman's claim of events. He will be taken at his word that he told the guy not to reach for his license while her contradictory testimony will not be considered reliable.

AS for paranoia, it is a feeling of fear that others want to harm you, regardless of whether it is true or not. One can be justly paranoid. It's another word for you to learn about, after "mock".

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 12:11:19   Reply   Private Reply

#125: Pinguinite    To: misterwhite (#123)

His "side bitch" is calm because she knows she'll continue to get her welfare, housing and food stamps.

You know a lot more about what happened at the scene than anyone else does. You must be very smart.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 12:12:25   Reply   Private Reply

#126: Roscoe    To: misterwhite (#123)

His "side bitch" is calm because she knows she'll continue to get her welfare, housing and food stamps.

And Newports.

And GoFundMe money.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 12:38:50   Reply   Private Reply

#127: GrandIsland    To: Roscoe (#126)

Ya ever notice it's just scumbags who primarily smoke now? There is a reason for everything. lol

Mother Nature at work. Maybe she can suck that Decktard cure-all up in her lungs, marijuana, to cure her lung cancer in a few years.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-09 12:48:25   Reply   Private Reply

#128: Roscoe    To: GrandIsland (#127)

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 12:55:13   Reply   Private Reply

#129: misterwhite    To: Roscoe (#128)

"... and cartons of Newport cigarettes."

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 15:52:50   Reply   Private Reply

#130: misterwhite    To: Roscoe (#126)

"And GoFundMe money."

How much you give?

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 15:53:54   Reply   Private Reply

#131: GrandIsland    To: Roscoe (#128)

Newports... the poison of many scumbags. I like it better when they dabble in heroin laced with Fentanyl. Just the thought of that gets me HIGH. lol

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-09 15:59:08   Reply   Private Reply

#132: misterwhite    To: Pinguinite, Roscoe (#124)

"He will be taken at his word that he told the guy not to reach for his license"

Whoa! Who said the cop asked for his license? Yeah. The girl.

Who said he told the cop he had a concealed carry license. Again. The girl.

Who said they were pulled over for a busted taillight? The girl. That's a lie and I suspect the other statements are also.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 16:09:09   Reply   Private Reply

#133: GrandIsland    To: misterwhite (#132)

Pingtard will believe ANYONE if they hate the Po-Po. Regardless of how ignorant and dysfuntional they are.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-09 16:15:25   Reply   Private Reply

#134: buckeroo    To: Pinguinite (#113)

Sure is acting like one here [roscoe].

Acting? It was hatched that way and knows of no other method for communication interchange.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-09 16:35:26   Reply   Private Reply

#135: Roscoe    To: misterwhite (#130)

How much you give?

Give? I was wondering how much I could get if I claimed to be traumatized by the video.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 17:43:12   Reply   Private Reply

#136: Roscoe    To: misterwhite (#132)

That's a lie and I suspect the other statements are also.

I wonder if Pinguinite was an OJ juror?

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 17:51:49   Reply   Private Reply

#137: Roscoe    To: misterwhite (#130)

How much you give?

DANG! I just checked and she has made seven thousand dollars in only the last five hours. That's gotta be more than buckeroo and tpaine make in a year combined.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 18:02:31   Reply   Private Reply

#138: Pinguinite    To: misterwhite (#132)

Whoa! Who said the cop asked for his license? Yeah. The girl.

Who said he told the cop he had a concealed carry license. Again. The girl.

Who said they were pulled over for a busted taillight? The girl. That's a lie and I suspect the other statements are also.

Well you really ARE smart. I guess you were really were there.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 18:41:33   Reply   Private Reply

#139: Pinguinite    To: Roscoe (#136)

I wonder if Pinguinite was an OJ juror?

Oh yes, I was.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 18:42:54   Reply   Private Reply

#140: Roscoe    To: Pinguinite (#139)

Right on!

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 18:44:58   Reply   Private Reply

#141: misterwhite    To: Pinguinite (#138)

"Well you really ARE smart."

Amazing what one can learn when keeping an open mind.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-09 18:45:11   Reply   Private Reply

#142: Pinguinite    To: misterwhite (#141)

Amazing what one can learn when keeping an open mind.

Yes it is. Which is why you should try it some time.

You being, of course, probably the most one-sided & biased person I've ever posted to. Always pro-cop, no matter what. Open minded? Not you by a long shot.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-09 18:51:30   Reply   Private Reply

#143: tpaine    To: Roscoe (#137)

Roscoe (#126) mentions:--- "And GoFundMe money."

How much you give? --- misterwhite

Give? I was wondering how much I could get if I claimed to be traumatized by the video. -- Roscoe

DANG! I just checked and she has made seven thousand dollars in only the last five hours. That's gotta be more than buckeroo and tpaine make in a year combined. --- Roscoe

Gotta love it when the boobsie twins fuck up their lines. ---

And roscoe, I'm retired now, living off my investments, but in the day I made over six figures, contracting, quite routinely.

(Please, don't rat me out to the IRS)

tpaine posted on 2016-07-09 18:53:53   Reply   Private Reply

#144: goldilucky    To: Pinguinite (#115)

I cannot remember where I read about the Minnesota body cameras. I believe I heard it on CNN.

goldilucky posted on 2016-07-09 19:31:16   Reply   Private Reply

#145: goldilucky    To: Roscoe (#116)

No, I believe I heard about it on CNN. They not only showed the video of this incident but mentioned about lacking of body cameras.

goldilucky posted on 2016-07-09 19:32:28   Reply   Private Reply

#146: Roscoe    To: goldilucky (#145)

No, I believe I heard about it on CNN.

CNN is a poor source for information. Some jurisdictions in Minnesota have body cameras, some do not. It is still in the process of being rolled out.

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 20:14:54   Reply   Private Reply

#147: goldilucky    To: Roscoe (#146)

Well, then I guess it is only fair to say that the video I posted remains undisputed.

goldilucky posted on 2016-07-09 20:40:33   Reply   Private Reply

#148: Roscoe    To: goldilucky (#147)

the video I posted remains undisputed

Who disputed its existence?

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-09 21:14:40   Reply   Private Reply

#149: Roscoe    To: misterwhite (#132)

Roscoe posted on 2016-07-10 05:27:52   Reply   Private Reply

#150: misterwhite    To: Roscoe (#149)

Excellent video.

At the end he makes a good point -- law enforcement is unable to get their side of the story out. That needs to change.

There's nothing we can do about the lies put out by the other side, but the public deserves to have both sides, sooner rather than later.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-10 11:22:29   Reply   Private Reply

#151: misterwhite    To: Roscoe (#140)

Poster boy for the black, unbiased juror.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-10 11:40:05   Reply   Private Reply

#152: misterwhite    To: Roscoe (#137)

"DANG! I just checked and she has made seven thousand dollars in only the last five hours."

Lotsa new boyfriends gonna be comin' 'round when dey hear about dat! And dey be bearin' Newports.

Little do they realize that $7K will be up her nose by the end of the week.

misterwhite posted on 2016-07-10 11:44:44   Reply   Private Reply