Search Wikipedia
Presidential finding
A presidential finding is an executive directive issued by the head of the executive branch of a government, similar to the more well-known executive order. The term is mostly used by the United States Government, and in other countries may be identified by different terms. Such findings and other executive decrees are usually protocols which have evolved through the course of government and not typically established by law.
--- I, Donald Trump, find that Congress is unable or unwilling to address the pressing issue of personal defense in the United States, and thus failing to pass the necessary laws, -- do issue this temporary directive, valid until suitable legislations are enacted.
Under the 2nd Amendment, citizens of the United States shall have the right to carry arms capable of concealment in any public place in the United States of America..
#1: tpaine To: Nolu Chan, Y'ALL, (#0)
Or possibly our resident expert in legal type bullshit, --- Nolu Chan, -- could fancy up the language a bit.
Something like: --
As per the provisions of the 2nd Amendment, citizens of the United States shall have the right to carry arms capable of concealment in any public place in the United States of America, and nothing in State or local law shall infringe upon this directive.
tpaine posted on 2016-06-15 19:20:56 Reply Private Reply
#2: paraclete To: tpaine (#0)
paraclete posted on 2016-06-15 22:00:54 Reply Private Reply
#3: Vicomte13 To: paraclete (#2)
If that would actually WORK, it would be expedient. But it won't.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-06-15 22:48:53 Reply Private Reply
#4: tpaine To: paraclete, Y'ALL, and in particular, the canary klan (#2)
Lighten up dumbo. I came up with this idea because the canary Klan had such a weird negative reaction to gun free zones and the fact that they are unconstitutional. I'm a bit surprised that Trump supports that fact, in fact.
Get a grip. I doubt that Trump would ever attempt such a directive. -- Not that he shouldn't....
tpaine posted on 2016-06-15 23:16:26 Reply Private Reply
#5: paraclete To: tpaine (#4)
You see that last qualifier is the problem. Dump is a man who reacts, he is reactionary and giving him a tool to get what he wants and fight about it later is dangerous. You already have a president who has ruled by decree, so now you want another, and one far more reactionary than BO
paraclete posted on 2016-06-16 07:51:19 Reply Private Reply
#6: nolu chan To: tpaine, yukon (#1)
[tpaine #1] Or possibly our resident expert in legal type bullshit, --- Nolu Chan, -- could fancy up the language a bit.
No. As per your modus operandi as yukon, you are attempting to disrupt on as many threads as possible. I am participating on two threads only.
I will not assist you with your whoring and moving to a new corner to start over again as a virgin with your tired and defeated arguments.
http://www2.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=46277
http://www2.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=46639
nolu chan posted on 2016-06-16 15:47:46 Reply Private Reply
#7: tpaine To: nolu chan (#6)
Weird that you imagine I'm operating like Yukon, seeing he was a member of your group, the canary Klan.
You've defeated none of my arguments, and your refusal to engage here shows that yours are tired.
Give it up.. All you can do is post repetitive legal opinions, opinions that DO NOT change our Constitution.
tpaine posted on 2016-06-16 23:12:50 Reply Private Reply
#8: tpaine To: As per the provisions of the 2nd Amendment, citizens of the United States shall have the right to carry arms capable of concealment in any public place in the United States of America, and nothing in State or local law shall infringe upon this directive. (#1)
Could President Trump issue such a finding?
Should he?
tpaine posted on 2016-06-17 13:44:13 Reply Private Reply