The Push For Disarmament Begins: “The Globalists Are Waiting in the Wings To Take Down America And Confiscate Firearms”

Source: SHTF Plan
Published: Jun 14, 2016
Author: Jeremiah Johnson
Post Date: 2016-06-15 09:28:41 by Deckard
Views: 7037

america-burns

The headlines and news networks are awash with the shooting that occurred on Sunday in Florida – 50 dead and 53 hospitalized in the largest single mass-shooting incident in the history of the U.S.  History in the making, and as Rahm Emmanuel put it, never let a crisis go to waste.  The governor of Florida quickly declared a state of emergency, and as the FBI is labeling it as a “terrorist incident,” undoubtedly the federal presence is going to increase.

All of the machinery is in place and has been in place for quite some time, now.  The harbinger of things to come was already outlined by Obama, on January 14, 2014 in a White House Press Conference:

“…we are not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re providing Americans the kind of help they need.  I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone, and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward…”

-Barack Hussein Obama I

Now in case anyone hasn’t noticed, the tempo of “town hall” meetings has been picked up quite a bit, especially Obama’s push for more gun control.  In between using taxpayer dollars to campaign for Hillary Clinton and vacationing at Martha’s Vineyard, Obama has “resurrected” the push for gun control.  Coincidentally, this mass shooting occurs barely even a week after Obama met with his plants and puppets to “discuss” gun control policies.  This on the heels of the 9th Circuit Court on which on June 9, 2016 struck down the right to carry concealed as a right given under the U.S. Constitution.  Undoubtedly this one will run right up to the Supreme Court for a liberal “reinterpretation” of the Second Amendment.

This latest incident will give him the juice to proceed with an executive order.  We knew that it was inevitable: a pretext would be created to provide “justification” for either some form of gun registration (this always leads to gun confiscation) or the emplacement of martial law.  Remember, the UN and the globalists are just waiting in the wings for the ability to take down the United States and confiscate the firearms.

On September 25, 2013 John Kerry signed the UN Arms Trade Treaty, “On behalf of President Obama and the United States of America.”  Seems to this author that the United States of America didn’t really have much of a say-so on this issue.  There are many who will say, “Well, in order for that treaty to be exercised, it will have to have the Senate approve it.  Even then, it is onerous to the Constitution…Marbury vs. Madison, and all.”

Let us remind ourselves that Obamacare was not able to be rammed through as commerce, so they confirmed that it is a tax.  Only trouble is…it didn’t originate in the House of Representatives, now, did it?  Yet here it is.  This next round is for the firearms, and they’re ramping up for it from every angle: domestic terrorism, and the constant global threat of terrorism. Some catch phrases here that will come into play: “In the interests of national security,” and “in the interests of public safety.”

The bottom line: they can’t take the U.S. down without taking the guns out of the hands of its citizens.

Don’t forget some of the other wonderful agreements, pacts, and statements of understanding Obama has drawn up with countries such as Canada, Russia, and others to bring their forces onto American soil to help “enforce order” if the President of the United States – Obama – is unable to enforce the laws under his administration.  According to the UN, only “authorized state parties” (referring to the governments and their armed forces and police apparatuses) are to have any firearms.

Executive Order 13603 is the one that confiscates all of the resources under an emergency (men and materials, the former being forced labor).  The NDAA provides direction for the inculcation of martial law during an emergency and the indefinite detention of American citizens with neither a writ of Habeas Corpus or a trial.  We are seeing the draconian measures taken in the private sector and the banks in terms of limiting cash withdrawals from the institutions and the ATM’s.

We are seeing the positioning of military equipment throughout the United States, the federalization of National Guard Troops, the federalization of municipal, local, and state police forces, and all of the above coming under the blanket of the federal government and activated by FEMA and the DHS.

They need a war or a false flag to start the whole ball rolling and this shooting is just the beginning.  “Wag the Dog” never really stopped playing…only in the theaters.  The federal government picked up the movie and has been writing the sequels and following them as policy, both foreign and domestic.

They are telegraphing the left hook: they are going to use this incident to come for the guns, starting out with “assault” weapons and high-capacity magazines.  Hillary will use her clout and get behind it, but it is Obama who will make it happen.  Why?

Obama is the outgoing president: he’ll make the gun control happen, so that it isn’t an uphill battle for Hillary.  What can’t be obtained through Congress will be obtained by EO, and “justified” by the false flag incident where he “had to act for the public good.”

This is just the beginning, and it may very well be that it isn’t just the firearms that come under fire with an EO.  One or two more of these type of incidents and they’ll roll out the martial law juggernaut.  They didn’t put all of these measures into place as a hobby, and with 315 million Muppets, the faster they act with a situation such as this, the easier it will be to control the public and inculcate these measures before they even realize what has happened.

Jeremiah Johnson is the Nom de plume of a retired Green Beret of the United States Army Special Forces (Airborne).  Mr. Johnson is also a Gunsmith, a Certified Master Herbalist, a Montana Master Food Preserver, and a graduate of the U.S. Army’s SERE school (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape).  He lives in a cabin in the mountains of Western Montana with his wife and three cats. You can follow Jeremiah’s regular writings at SHTFplan.com or contact him here.

This article may be republished or excerpted with proper attribution to the author and a link to www.SHTFplan.com.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: paraclete    To: Deckard (#0)

We really have to stop playing on people's fears over this. The US once had a ban on assault weapons and the situation you have now is the result of removing that ban. Military weapons should not be in the hands of the general population, they have one purpose; to kill and to kill efficiently. A gun does not discriminate and a crazed person does not discriminate. Who sold the latest shooter the weapon? the ammunition? the extra magazines? nothing suspicious? well that's why there should be a ban

paraclete posted on 2016-06-15 09:56:14   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Stoner    To: paraclete (#1)

" We really have to stop playing on people's fears over this. "

Lets just ban muzzies from out shores.

I do not see these mass shootings being carried out by Amish; Baptists, Methodists, Mormons, Jehovah Witness, Catholics, Episcopalians, Buddhists, or any other religions.

ONLY MUZZIES !!

As to the weapons, more deaths/injuries could be inflicted with other means. For example, at a club a band called Great White used pyrotechnics, caused a fire that killed over 100.

Stoner posted on 2016-06-15 10:44:24   Reply   Private Reply

#3: TrappedInMd    To: paraclete (#1)

A gun does not discriminate and a crazed person does not discriminate.

Humans discriminate. That's human nature.

TrappedInMd posted on 2016-06-15 14:20:39   Reply   Private Reply

#4: ConservingFreedom    To: paraclete (#1)

The US once had a ban on assault weapons

What ban? When was it removed?

ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-06-15 14:46:53   Reply   Private Reply

#5: tpaine    To: paraclete (#1)

We really have to stop playing on people's fears over this. The US once had a ban on assault weapons and the situation you have now is the result of removing that ban.

Your irrational conclusion is 'playing on people's fears'.

'Assault weapons' are just semi-auto rifles with high cartridge capacities, which describes millions of existing hunting type rifles. -- But regardless, bearing these types of arms is protected by the 2nd.

Military weapons should not be in the hands of the general population,

Totally wrong, as we are all members of the citizens milita, as made clear since the founding.

they have one purpose; to kill and to kill efficiently. A gun does not discriminate and a crazed person does not discriminate.

Your making an emotional plea, Ms Brady.

Who sold the latest shooter the weapon? the ammunition? the extra magazines? nothing suspicious? well that's why there should be a ban.

With an unconstitutional ban, a black market would have supplied the shooter. -- Again, you're simply hyping the situation.

If the people in the nightclub had been armed, (as per the Constitution) - none of this would have happened.

tpaine posted on 2016-06-15 14:54:15   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Stoner    To: tpaine (#5)

Very good reply. Well stated.

Stoner posted on 2016-06-15 14:57:17   Reply   Private Reply

#7: tpaine    To: Stoner (#6)

Thanks..

Two bits we'll get nothing but more emotional bull from Ms Brady.

tpaine posted on 2016-06-15 15:08:13   Reply   Private Reply

#8: Stoner    To: tpaine (#7)

" Two bits we'll get nothing but more emotional bull from Ms Brady. "

Of course.

I still have not been out, but talking to friends, sounds like local supplies are drying up. So far, pricing has not been gouged, I would sure hate to be in position that I needed to buy now.

Stoner posted on 2016-06-15 16:09:55   Reply   Private Reply

#9: Stoner    To: paraclete (#1)

Say paraclete, if I remember correctly, aren't you in Australia ?

Stoner posted on 2016-06-15 16:11:40   Reply   Private Reply

#10: paraclete    To: Stoner (#9)

Say paraclete, if I remember correctly, aren't you in Australia ?

Yes I do live in a nation where assault weapons are banned and we haven't had one of these events in many years. It does not mean our population is unarmed, apparently we are the sixth largest buyers of guns in the world but not assault weapons

paraclete posted on 2016-06-15 19:27:45   Reply   Private Reply

#11: tpaine    To: paraclete (#10)

You got any more emotional bull, sonny?

tpaine posted on 2016-06-15 19:33:36   Reply   Private Reply

#12: paraclete    To: tpaine (#11)

You got any more emotional bull, sonny?

I doubt I'm young enough to be your son, but this is not emotional, it is rational. If a would be shooter cannot get hold of a rapid fire weapon, that shooter is unable to do as much damage, but psychologically that shooter's purpose is frustrated and may even be changed. There is more to this this than a simple deniel of availability of a weapon. The shooter's power is taken away.

The question is do you want the general population to be safe? or at the mercy of any disturbed individual? Criminals will still get guns and destroy each other, your government will even give them weapons, individuals can still possess the means of self defense, but access has to be restricted to certain individuals. Should a member of a group known to have anti social tendencies have the same access as the rest of us? I say NO! no matter what that group might be

paraclete posted on 2016-06-15 22:18:48   Reply   Private Reply

#13: buckeroo    To: paraclete, tpaine (#12)

The question is do you want the general population to be safe?

Where in the US Constitution does this QUESTION appear? Here, let me suggest that the US Constitution has mandated the Second Amendment and the question is not apparent.

Got it? RKBA is an individual choice and not some obscure question that political groups want to remove from the people by the invocation of irrevocable government power.

buckeroo posted on 2016-06-15 22:40:18   Reply   Private Reply

#14: GrandIsland    To: paraclete (#12)

The question is do you want the general population to be safe? or at the mercy of any disturbed individual?

Freedom isn't free, libtard. If people die from time to time... it's called life. The price we pay for freedom. You want a society you never have to worry about being shot by a nut? GO TO PRISON.

You'll just get stabbed by a shank. The weak never survive.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-15 22:44:55   Reply   Private Reply

#15: tpaine    To: paraclete (#12)

You got any more emotional bull, sonny?

I doubt I'm young enough to be your son, but this is not emotional, it is rational.

Your comments at #1 were both emotional and juvenile.

If a would be shooter cannot get hold of a rapid fire weapon, that shooter is unable to do as much damage, but psychologically that shooter's purpose is frustrated and may even be changed. There is more to this this than a simple deniel of availability of a weapon. The shooter's power is taken away.

Psychological, emotional bull... We've had rapid fire multi- barrled weapons since the flintlock era... We will NEVER be able to take away a determined crazies ability to kill lots of people.

The question is do you want the general population to be safe?

You want to trade safety for an individual freedom.. That's juvenile emotionalism.

--- or at the mercy of any disturbed individual? Criminals will still get guns and destroy each other, your government will even give them weapons, --

That's EXACTLY why we need military/govt grade arms..

--- individuals can still possess the means of self defense, but access has to be restricted to certain individuals.

Individuals that people like you get to choose?--- That'll be the day.

Should a member of a group known to have anti social tendencies have the same access as the rest of us? I say NO! no matter what that group might be

Give some thought to the fact that you're being anti-social about our rights to self defense, sonny.

tpaine posted on 2016-06-15 23:55:59   Reply   Private Reply

#16: GarySpFC    To: paraclete (#10)

Yes I do live in a nation where assault weapons are banned and we haven't had one of these events in many years. It does not mean our population is unarmed, apparently we are the sixth largest buyers of guns in the world but not assault weapons

And haven't home invasions and other crimes increased dramatially since Australia's gun confiscation by the liberals?

GarySpFC posted on 2016-06-16 07:15:39   Reply   Private Reply

#17: Stoner    To: GrandIsland (#14)

" You want a society you never have to worry about being shot by a nut? GO TO PRISON.

You'll just get stabbed by a shank. The weak never survive. "

LOL ! He will then want Shank registration & Shank Control

Stoner posted on 2016-06-16 07:42:50   Reply   Private Reply

#18: paraclete    To: GarySpFC (#16)

haven't home invasions and other crimes increased dramatially since Australia's gun confiscation by the liberals?

In reality the general crime rate hasn't increased although population has risen dramatically. The murder and suicide rate by firearm has declined dramatically by about 66% I have seen statistics that suggest there is an increase in crime but other statistics show decline, there was an increase in some crime immediately after the buyback but it has declined since. We did have a spate of asian gang related home invasions but that appears to have abated now the refugee influx is under control. Our law enforcement has specifically targeted certain groups. What has risen is the reporting of sexually related crime and that has nothing to do with firearms. The point here is that overall there has been no harmfull effect from changing gun ownership patterns. The population can still own firearms and do acquire them but it is difficult for terrorists and such to acquire high powered firearms as is borne out in recent terrorist incidents.

I know the american NRA would love Australias laws to change because they give the lie to their arguments but we have been brave enough to defy the special interest groups. You might need a "militia", we do not, and from the statistics I see gun ownership does not keep you safe

paraclete posted on 2016-06-16 07:43:25   Reply   Private Reply

#19: GrandIsland    To: Stoner (#17)

LOL ! He will then want Shank registration & Shank Control

It's human nature. Any human or animal, once dependent upon another for survival, will continue to ask for more to survive so they do less on their own. Whether it's welfare, safety or more regulations to combat their inability to make functional decisions.

This is why we grow left. Because the sheep WANT it and the politicians will give it to them. You and I are the last generation of constitutional thinking.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-16 08:18:22   Reply   Private Reply

#20: Stoner    To: GrandIsland (#19)

" You and I are the last generation of constitutional thinking. "

Sad to say that is most likely true. I am trying to steer my children towards the US Constitution.

Stoner posted on 2016-06-16 09:58:31   Reply   Private Reply

#21: paraclete    To: GrandIsland (#19)

This is why we grow left.

You grow left because you want to suck the government teat and your job creators have left for warmer climes

paraclete posted on 2016-06-16 10:03:19   Reply   Private Reply

#22: GrandIsland    To: paraclete (#21)

Just like the agenda posters, you are filthy LEFT and are slighted at the thought that EVERYONE isn't equal enough to get a lifetime monthly payment derived by a private mutual fund.

TFB, we ain't equal. You didn't pay into my retirement for 20 years. You get squat.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-16 17:55:58   Reply   Private Reply

#23: paraclete    To: GrandIsland (#22)

I'm not left, I don't expect the government to do more than it has said it will do which is make sure those funds are properly managed and not ponzi schemes. I pay for my own retirement but more than that I expect government accountability, a concept that appears to have gone out the window to be replaced by rhetoric. You appear to think that showing compassion to the unfortunate is weakness, If I had my way they would all work even if it is street sweeping.

You say we arn't equal, you are right, you have an appauling attitude

paraclete posted on 2016-06-16 19:37:19   Reply   Private Reply

#24: GrandIsland    To: paraclete (#23)

You say we arn't equal, you are right

I'm glad I could teach you something.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-16 19:46:10   Reply   Private Reply

#25: paraclete    To: GrandIsland (#24)

I'm glad I could teach you something.

there is nothing you can teach me, your attitude stinks and so do your politics

paraclete posted on 2016-06-17 09:12:34   Reply   Private Reply

#26: Deckard    To: GrandIsland (#19)

You and I are the last generation of constitutional thinking.

Hilarious.

You shit on the constitution every day as a cop.

Deckard posted on 2016-06-17 09:16:01   Reply   Private Reply

#27: Deckard    To: GrandIsland, buckeroo (#19)

FireIsland's idea of what "freedom" is : The freedom to kill someone for simply "strolling past his abode"

I'm free enough to shoot your stupid ass faster than you can say castle doctrine. Come stroll past my humble abode...

Not only that - he is "free" to plant a gun on someone just so he can satisfy his bloodlust.

Officers, that dead criminal pile of shit stole my gun out of my garage. The gun next to his worthless body. When I confronted the Paultard, he pointed it at me. I feel so bad. lol.

I guess he thinks he's still a cop or something.

Of course, his corrupt "brothers in blue" will give him a free pass on murder and planting "evidence".

Deckard posted on 2016-06-17 13:05:46   Reply   Private Reply

#28: GrandIsland    To: Deckard (#27)

There goes that Paultard conspiracy theory thinking. It's expected that anarchist stick together.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-17 16:38:00   Reply   Private Reply

#29: Deckard    To: GrandIsland (#28)

There goes that Paultard conspiracy theory thinking.

He jagoff, you're the one suggesting that you would break the law if a "Paultard" walked past his house.

Deckard posted on 2016-06-17 17:58:12   Reply   Private Reply

#30: GrandIsland    To: Deckard (#29)

you're the one suggesting that

That's what YOU took from what I said. All I said was I'd shoot that asshole Buckyboy dead as shit if that anarchist douchebag stole a gun from my garage.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-17 18:02:41   Reply   Private Reply

#31: Deckard    To: GrandIsland (#30)

All I said was I'd shoot that asshole Buckyboy dead as shit if that anarchist douchebag stole a gun from my garage.

Kinda tough for someone to do when they are just walking past your abode, right?

I'm free enough to shoot your stupid ass faster than you can say castle doctrine. Come stroll past my humble abode...

After that, you made sure you got your lies down pat for the cops who would inevitably show up.

Deckard posted on 2016-06-17 18:05:52   Reply   Private Reply

#32: Gatlin    To: GrandIsland (#30)

That's what YOU took from what I said.

He does this all the time ...

Gatlin posted on 2016-06-17 18:24:56   Reply   Private Reply

#33: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#32)

He does this all the time ...

If you two assclowns don't like being called out on your idiocy, I suggest you stop posting idiocy.

Deckard posted on 2016-06-17 19:40:41   Reply   Private Reply

#34: GrandIsland    To: Deckard (#33)

You don't suggest that Buckboy will live forever, do ya?

lol

GrandIsland posted on 2016-06-17 19:44:35   Reply   Private Reply

#35: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland, Deckard (#30)

I'd shoot that asshole Buckyboy dead as shit if that anarchist douchebag stole a gun from my garage.

Why would I want a squirt gun or a cap gun from your garage? BTW, didn't yusay you lived in your mother's basement? Now, you moved to the garage?

buckeroo posted on 2016-06-17 20:39:22   Reply   Private Reply

#36: jeremiad    To: paraclete (#1)

I hope you are happy in Australia, and bully to you for the gun bans. When your population becomes somewhere in the neighborhood of 250 million, with 30 million blacks, 50 million illegal mexicans, with a border nation manufacturing methamphetamine within 5 miles of San Diego, and a narco-terrorist state in charge, lets see how low your murder by guns rate is. The major cities here are overrun with drug gangs straight out of Mexico, China and even the old USSR. Our government makes a killing for our leaders being the biggest arms dealer the world will ever see, and selling Opium products and Cocaine to finance secret CIA doings. Our situation is much different than yours. Be well, but keep your anti gun sentiments where they belong, in Oz.

jeremiad posted on 2016-06-18 01:32:44   Reply   Private Reply

#37: paraclete    To: jeremiad (#36)

Hey you think you are the only ones with problems, we have big cities, minorities and drugs here too, meth is a big problem courtesy of overseas drug cartels and your drug culture which you succeed in exporting. Yes your government does have to stop being arms dealer of choice because it affects us all, so I have no intention of keeping my opinions to myself. We have successfully solved two parts of the equation that you have put forward so we expect you to pull you weight, which is considerable you keep telling us, and fix the other parts of the equation. Immigration is a problem you created for yourself, drugs are a problem you created for yourself, involvement in foriegn wars is a problem you created for yourself, debt is a problem you created for yourself

You know I half hope that Trump is successful, he might just get you to focus on fixing your own problems and leaving the rest of us to get on with it

paraclete posted on 2016-06-18 08:04:55   Reply   Private Reply