In other words, to get an anti-cancer effect, you need to light up around 1000 joints per day.

You really are a simpleton if you believe that smoking cannabis is the only way to reap its beneficial effects.

Yeah, I guess the National Cancer Institute is full of shit.

In the most recent update to the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) website included a listing of studies, which indicated anti-tumor effects of cannabis treatment.

Preclinical studies of cannabinoids have investigated the following activities:

Antitumor activity
• Studies in mice and rats have shown that cannabinoids may inhibit tumor growth by causing cell death, blocking cell growth, and blocking the development of blood vessels needed by tumors to grow. Laboratory and animal studies have shown that cannabinoids may be able to kill cancer cells while protecting normal cells.
• A study in mice showed that cannabinoids may protect against inflammation of the colon and may have potential in reducing the risk of colon cancer, and possibly in its treatment.
• A laboratory study of delta-9-THC in hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer) cells showed that it damaged or killed the cancer cells. The same study of delta-9-THC in mouse models of liver cancer showed that it had antitumor effects. Delta-9-THC has been shown to cause these effects by acting on molecules that may also be found in non-small cell lung cancer cells and breast cancer cells.
• A laboratory study of cannabidiol (CBD) in estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer cells showed that it caused cancer cell death while having little effect on normal breast cells. Studies in mouse models of metastatic breast cancer showed that cannabinoids may lessen the growth, number, and spread of tumors.
• A laboratory study of cannabidiol (CBD) in human glioma cells showed that when given along with chemotherapy, CBD may make chemotherapy more effective and increase cancer cell death without harming normal cells. Studies in mouse models of cancer showed that CBD together with delta-9-THC may make chemotherapy such as temozolomide more effective.

The NCI, part of the U.S. Department of Health, advises that ‘cannabinoids may be useful in treating the side effects of cancer and cancer treatment’ by smoking, eating it in baked products, drinking herbal teas or even spraying it under the tongue.

*****

Hey - you gonna go all "Reefer Madness" on us now?

" The charges against Smith, however, were later thrown out as the cops who broke into her home and murdered her dogs never bothered to show up to court. "

So, after all the commotion, dog killing, etc, charges were dropped and the hero's did not even bother to appear in court.

Wonder why these hero's do not go & raid some large drug traffickers, or the Bloods & Crips, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood ? I guess some woman & her three dogs are easier to bully.

One day, Karma will pay these brave "hero's" a visit. It will be bad.

In the most recent update to the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) website included a listing of studies, which indicated anti-tumor effects of cannabis treatment.

If marijuana is so DAMNED GOOD, then whey won't the NCI recommend it as a treatment for cancer?

The National Cancer Institute stated that cannabis kills cancer cells, but it is still far from recommended as a treatment for cancer patients.

I guess the National Cancer Institute is full of shit.

It all depends on what the definition of shit, is!!!

On 16 July 2015, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) updated the FAQ on their web site, Cancer.gov, to include a statement about cannabis and its effect upon cancer cells: “Cannabis has been shown to kill cancer cells in the laboratory.”

While the above-displayed quote does indeed appear on Cancer.gov, this does not mean that cannabis has been proved to kill cancer in humans. In fact, the NCI clarified the referenced statement by saying that insufficient evidence exists to recommend cannabis for use by cancer patients: “There is not enough evidence to recommend that patients inhale or ingest Cannabis as a treatment for cancer-related symptoms or side effects of cancer therapy.”

It should also be noted that NCI's claim that "cannabis kills cancer" cells is based on preclinical studies (research using animals to find out if a drug, procedure, or treatment is likely to be useful). While cannabis and cannabinoids have been studied in clinical trials (research involving human test subjects) for ways to manage the side effects of cancer, Cancer.gov reports that: “No clinical trials of Cannabis as a treatment for cancer in humans have been found in the CAM on PubMed database maintained by the National Institutes of Health.”

Cannabis and cannabinoids have been studied in clinical trials for ways to manage side effects of cancer and cancer therapies. Cannabis and cannabinoids may [repeat: MAY] have benefits in treating the symptoms of cancer or the side effects of cancer therapies. There is growing interest in treating children for symptoms such as nausea with Cannabis and cannabinoids, although studies are limited. Accordingly, the FDA has not yet approved cannabis as a treatment for cancer: “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved Cannabis or cannabinoids for use as a cancer treatment.”

The cops shot one dog standing next to it's owner - no threat.

HOW do you KNOW this to be a fact?

Another one was shot through the locked bathroom door.

And you think it was a threat?

With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression. Hey, sport, it doesn’t take an animal behavioral specialist with a doctorate degree to know that a dominant-aggressive dog is very dangerous and poses a threat.

BAM! BAM! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!

Cujo dog ... dead dog!!!

The third one, the pregnant one was in the basement - they went down there and killed that one too.

Yep, they sure did.

And we have no idea why they did.

Nowhere have the cops claimed that the dogs threatened them.

You don't seriously expect Matt Agorist to have included in his yellow journalism article that they did ... do you?

If you do, then you are a bigger idiot than I ever thought possible.

All charges against the owner were dropped when the cops failed to show up in court.

Yes, they were and we don't know why the cops failed to show up in court.

This is sociopathic behavior …

You are now a forensic psychologist, psychiatrist or criminologist … I don’t think so.

… and to make it worse, the cops gloated about killing the dogs and threatened the owner.

This was according to Nikita Smith’s hearsay information that was not adequately substantiate by an independent unbiased source.

Oh, they found marijuana in her house and of course you place full faith in any statement from a fellow pothead … of course you do.

I'm guessing you've never owned a pet.

Murder is defined by the unlawful taking of HUMAN life, dipshit. Therefore it is impossible to "murder" a dog... unless we are talking figuratively, like your wife is a dog.

If for some reason Donald Trump is not inaugurated, taking office at noon Friday January 20, 2017 there will be a 'civil' war like none ever seen on earth before.

If, by the Grace of God, Donald Trump is inaugurated, taking office at noon Friday January 20, 2017 there will be an escalation of the war that will begin with his winning on Tuesday November 8, 2016.

The important thing to remember is that, We, The people are not going to go back to serfdom and the ruling political class, their masters and owners in the donor class and the slaves of both, the enforcer class, are not going to surrender the power and wealth they have accumulated, by a simple vote of the people.

There are some things you, who support the status quo, you who side with the ruling political class, their masters and owners in the donor class and the slaves of both, the enforcer class, should not forget, you are not going to be forgiven.

The mistake made by our forefathers by allowing, for the most part, the Tories to stay, to retain their wealth and property, will not be repeated.

I do believe the events will be much shorter and much less horrifying if Donald wins and takes office, for I am convinced that the Enforcer Class will not shed their blood and die as willing and for as long a period of time defending, protecting and serving their rulers and masters, as we the people are for freedom.

Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.

Murder. The unlawful killing of a human being by another with malice aforethought, either express or implied. It is legally impossible to murder a dog.

Does that include Police Dogs?

If not, how is there an exception?

I always thought murder was taken of an innocent life.

The word is Ratsach, and it means the taking of defenseless human life.

Thou shalt not kill (ratsach).

Such as the baby in the womb and euthanasia such as the murder of Terri Schiavo.

Your dog is not worth one human life. You just showedd Yourself to be stupid.

We may disagree there old friend.

Wonder why these hero's do not go & raid some large drug traffickers, or the Bloods & Crips, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood ?

They shoot back.

Does that include Police Dogs?

Why do you ask such ignorant questions? There is no state that charges the offender with murder for the intential killing of ANY ANIMAL including a police K9. Most people with a half of brain would already know without paging through a states penal code that EVERY state that desires charges be filed against a person that injures or kills a police animal has MADE A SEPARATE CHARGE FOR THAT PARTICULAR CRIME because no state could possibly prove "murder" when talking about an ANIMAL as a victim.

No animal equals human life, no, not even a police K9, the Kentucky Derby winning horse or even Lasy himself... the idea that an animal is on the same "equal" status as a human being IS A LIBTARD IDEAL... you show your colors.

" With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression. "

HOW do you KNOW this to be a fact?

"My dog was worth approximately 500 of these thug cops."

Your dog is not worth one human life.

We'll have to agree to disagree.

" With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression. "

HOW do you KNOW this to be a fact?

How do you KNOW the author, Matt Agorist, stated FACTS in the article?

That would be the first question an intelligent person with general cognitive problem-solving skills would ask … est-ce pas droit ?

"Wonder why these hero's do not go & raid some large drug traffickers, or the Bloods & Crips, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood ?"

They shoot back.

Exactly.

With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression.

Even IF that was true, the does not excuse the cops shooting THROUGH the LOCKED DOOR to kill the dogs.

Being locked in the bathroom they posed NO THREAT!

You know, when you post shit like this in an absurd attempt to defend this kind of psychopathic behavior, I can't help but believe that you are just as mentally fucked up as these sadistic cops are.

Being locked in the bathroom they posed NO THREAT!

How do you know the dogs were in a locked bathroom?

Speaking of posting shit, it is you who posted a shit article containing only hearsay and opinions ... then you believe it's the Gospel.

I am not defending the cops ... I am merely trying to point out that we don't know what happened and have no basis on which to form opinions.

Nowhere have the cops claimed that the dogs threatened them.

You don't seriously expect Matt Agorist to have included in his yellow journalism article that they did ... do you?

No mention of it in the Daily News story either.

You do know how to click on a link, don't you?

Nowhere have the cops claimed that the dogs threatened them. You don't seriously expect Matt Agorist to have included in his yellow journalism article that they did ... do you?

No mention of it in the Daily News story either.

Oh, since there was "no mention" of it ... then we should take it as a fact that the dogs did not threaten the cops.

No Mention = Valid Confirmation?

Are you that stupid ... and that is not a rhetorical question.

Do you know how to have an open mind and look objectively at anything?

The answer to that "be" NO!!!

How do you know the dogs were in a locked bathroom?

Did you see the fucking picture, or are you blind?

I'm done with you here asshole.

It's the same bullshit with you every time.

You have displayed on numerous threads like this one that you're a sick and sadistic man with no moral compass - a disturbed individual with a deep seated authority fetish.

You have a mindset that says cops are gods and nothing they do may be questioned and frankly, you and your repulsive ilk sicken me.

It's the same bullshit with you every time.

You have displayed on numerous threads like this one that you're a sick and sadistic man with no moral compass - a disturbed individual with a deep seated anarchy fetish.

You have a mindset that says criminals and drug addicts are gods and nothing they do may be questioned and frankly, you and your repulsive ilk sicken me.

Yep - typical room temperature IQ cop.

Maybe you and Gatslime should get a room and blow each other.

No animal equals human life ...

Ordinarily I would have to agree with you. But in certain cases, I must say that it depends strongly on the human(s) and the particular animal.

There is a breed of dog know as the Rough Collie. Like Lassie in the movies and on TV, the Rough Collie is a friendly dog that is intelligent, active and good with children, people and other animals. Rough collies have a history of being incredibly loyal and protective of their owners, making them excellent family dogs and compatible with people when out and about mingling with society.

Take the case of a Rough Collie named Sassy. She is a therapy dog with some pretty amazing skills. In addition to being trained to perform typical tasks for a therapy dog, Sassy is able to tell if someone is going to have a seizure using her sense of smell. A family is hoping to adopt Sassy for their son who suffers from an unusual form of epilepsy, which can cause him to have several seizures a day.

Now, if Buckard and Pukard could be trained to do the same as Sassy and become as intelligent, active and good with people as a Rough Collie … then I would agree with you that no animal equals a human life.

Until then, we will just have to agree to disagree … with respect to these two Paultards.

You don't even have the intelligence to post something original?

My intent wasn't originality, it was to show how much of an asshole you are by just changing a few of your own words. Douche

It's the same bullshit with you every time.

Seeking facts before making a firm opinion is NOT bullshit.

I have a mindset that searches for factual information and I will not "shoot from the hip" like you do after reading an article that obviously presents only one side and therefore must be determined to be biased.

You are done here because you have tunnel vision that only sees what you want to see and "you can't handle facts."

You are frighten of me standing up to you and challenging you to consider all aspects of a situation ... so you are running away.

Maybe you and Gatslime should get a room and blow each other.

YOu use this same thing over ... and over ... and over.

Get something new.

Wait, that's an impossible task for you.

He is paraphrasing to make a point.

You didn't even read the whole post before you commented.

That is so typical of you ...

He is paraphrasing to make a point.

That wasn't paraphrasing, dummy. It was "parroting."

That wasn't parphrasing, dummy. It was "parroting."

I'd call it intellectual laziness and lack of originality.

But what do you expect from a guy who spent his career as a mindless enforcement drone for the State?

But what do you expect from a guy who spent his career as a mindless enforcement drone for the State?

Being a file clerk at a TV station spreading main stream lies is a mindless and meaningless job ...

it carried a real meaning.

How could Deckard's post, which was plagerized by GrandIsland, have any meaning for GrandIsland or to the readers? The "meaning" was completely removed just because of the vulgar author: GrandIsland.

The "meaning" was completely removed just because of the vulgar author: GrandIsland.

Only removed from the warped and diseased mind of a Paultard.

You have a problem with that ... and this is not a question.

You have a problem with that

I have a problem with everything about the infamous and irreputable kanary klub klan performs for word, thought and deed.

I have a problem with everything about the infamous and irreputable kanary klub klan performs for word, thought and deed.

Then I will be glad to help you with that.

First, take a large 2-foot square piece of old dirty rough cardboard and write on it:

I have a problem with everything about the infamous and irreputable kanary klub klan performs for word, thought and deed.

Then, roll it into a large diameter tube and jam it up your Paultard ass.

Now, Problem gone "BYE-BYE" and will no longer be a bother to little Bucky boy.

Try the remedy for your problem ... but promise not to sigh and smile while performing the task.

" How do you KNOW the author, Matt Agorist, stated FACTS in the article? "

How do you know that he did not? And what is the source of your info: " " With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door " "

" That would be the first question an intelligent person with general cognitive problem-solving skills would ask … est-ce pas droit ? " Take your own advice.

unique way

pissed