The left-wing website Salon just released a stomach-turning video attempting to normalize pedophilia. The video's narrator, a young pedophile, explains his "sexuality" and brands himself as a pedophile but not a "monster" or "child molester."
Watch here:
The man says pedophilia is "not something he chose" but something he will have to live with for the rest of his life. He adds, "not all pedophiles are child molesters, and not all child molesters are pedophiles."
He says his purpose now is to educate people about his "sexuality," which he allegedly does on his website for "virtuous pedophiles."
Politically, you can see how the left is moving the country towards a total acceptance society. By labeling pedophilia as a "sexuality" Salon is pushing for pedophiles to perhaps, one day, have their own special "rights."
But when has acceptance of a problem led to its correction?
Some commenters on the Facebook video echoed this sentiment:
Tony Lawson: "Blown away by the comments and the normalisation of this. It's not accepted for a reason. It's a mental illness and it needs to be dealt with. They need advanced psychotherapy."
Robin Ford: Ok, here we go. I knew it wouldn't be long before the pedophiles decided to "come out." Won't be long B4 they too demand "rights" based on their sexual preference--children. What a slippery slope.
What do you think?
I think our nation is in desperate need of one hell of a cleaning. Guys like this needs a couple 230gr FMJ in his ear. How much longer is God the father going to allow these perversions to go unanswered?
#1: no gnu taxes To: Stoner (#0)
Kids will end end up messed up for life, and when they commit suicide, these leftards will blame conservatives for not being more acceptive.
no gnu taxes posted on 2016-05-19 11:25:06 Reply Private Reply
#2: A Pole To: Stoner, tpaine, paraclete, U don't know me, Roscoe, Willie Green, sneakypete, Vicomte13, TooConservative (#0)
One wise man said generations ago, that in every country there two real parties, party of the rich and party of the poor. One could say party of the owners and party of those who have to work.
Moral experiments and decadency are specialty of the first, the second are too busy and poor for that and are more conservative. It is a clever diversion to associate the left with decadency, so working people will have nobody to represent them.
A Pole posted on 2016-05-19 11:52:02 Reply Private Reply
#3: misterwhite To: Stoner (#0)
No matter your sexual proclivity, you have the power to choose to act on it or not. Just because you're a pedophile doesn't give you the excuse to molest children.
misterwhite posted on 2016-05-19 12:12:32 Reply Private Reply
#4: Stoner To: misterwhite (#3)
True. The cure is 230gr FMJ.
Stoner posted on 2016-05-19 12:20:46 Reply Private Reply
#5: Don To: Stoner (#0)
Don posted on 2016-05-19 12:24:00 Reply Private Reply
#6: sneakypete To: A Pole (#2)
He wasn't very wise or he would have known that perception is everything,and in a village where they sleep with the cattle in their huts,the man with a wooden floor and running water is a king envied by all.
I talk to people all the time with well over a half-million dollars in assets and steady jobs that consider themselves to be poor. They don't even know what the word means.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-19 14:28:17 Reply Private Reply
#7: A Pole To: sneakypete, Vicomte13 (#6)
I said something else, you are not very attentive: "One could say party of the owners and party of those who have to work."
True rich are those who do not need to work, but they give work to those who must. In feudal times, the aristocrats did not have to till the soil or make things. But peasants and craftsmen had to (same with affluent skilled professionals like doctors, alchemists, lawyers and astrologers).
Of course some lords did tend a garden or made pretty stuff for pleasure and personal satisfaction. More often they got involved into development of agriculture and manufacture (the second brought their doom as it gave rise to the new ruling class). They did it sometimes to improve welfare of their subjects, sometimes to increase own might or both.
Do you get it now?
A Pole posted on 2016-05-20 07:01:41 Reply Private Reply
#8: GrandIsland To: Stoner (#0)
I'm sure their are a few anything goes, I respect no laws, PAULTARDS, that would say it's a constitutional right to your property to cork little kids.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-05-20 08:04:20 Reply Private Reply
#9: Stoner To: GrandIsland (#8)
I would suspect that when that gets to a large scale, we will witness an outbreak of vigilantism. The pendulum can only swing so far.
Stoner posted on 2016-05-20 09:52:30 Reply Private Reply
#10: Vicomte13 To: Stoner (#9)
Pedophila was the norm of the Greek and Roman Empires, the pagan societies of Europe, the Islamic world today, and is heavily practiced in India.
The Christian world is the odd man out.
As Christianity wanes (it is more resilient in the Third World than the rich world), there will be no pendulum swing. Rather, formerly Christian lands will revert to the standard natural pansexualism of mankind.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-05-20 10:43:43 Reply Private Reply
#11: redleghunter To: Stoner (#0)
Thanks
redleghunter posted on 2016-05-20 12:03:26 Reply Private Reply
#12: sneakypete To: A Pole (#7)
No,YOU are not very attentive,comrade. OWNERS work also,and usually a hell of a lot more hours than their employees.
If you had ever owned or operated a business you would know that.
True rich are those who do not need to work
Show me ONE billionaire that ain't out there busting his hump every day to make sure he doesn't lose what he already has.
AND....,except for the trust fund kids,you are not going to ever find a millionaire or billionaire that isn't obsessed with working. That's how they became millionaires and billionaires.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-20 14:20:36 Reply Private Reply
#13: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#12)
A K A Stone posted on 2016-05-20 15:15:45 Reply Private Reply
#14: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#13)
I know you need to believe in fairy tales,but the truth is he started at the top.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-20 17:05:14 Reply Private Reply
#15: A Pole To: A K A Stone (#13)
My heart is bleeding for them.
A Pole posted on 2016-05-20 17:32:15 Reply Private Reply
#16: A Pole To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#15)
Sorry, it was intended for the Sneaky.
A Pole posted on 2016-05-20 17:34:21 Reply Private Reply
#17: Stoner To: redleghunter (#11)
Try this:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/05/salon-reveals-the-lefts-next-play-normalization-of-pedophilia
Sorry about that. Don't know what happened.
Stoner posted on 2016-05-20 19:39:57 Reply Private Reply
#18: Stoner To: redleghunter (#11)
Stoner posted on 2016-05-20 20:23:41 Reply Private Reply
#19: redleghunter To: Stoner (#18)
redleghunter posted on 2016-05-20 21:27:54 Reply Private Reply
#20: goodnessmarlok To: Vicomte13 (#10)
I think in Catholic tradition a 32 year old man can marry a 14 year old girl, but thats not pedophilia depending on her state
goodnessmarlok posted on 2016-05-21 23:05:39 Reply Private Reply
#21: goodnessmarlok To: Vicomte13 (#10)
goodnessmarlok posted on 2016-05-21 23:06:51 Reply Private Reply
#22: goodnessmarlok To: Vicomte13 (#10)
goodnessmarlok posted on 2016-05-22 16:00:40 Reply Private Reply
#23: Stoner To: Vicomte13 (#10)
That was then, & over there. I do not know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods, if that breaks out around here, and the locals find out, the perpetrators will end up being tree ornaments. Or, just vanish.
Stoner posted on 2016-05-22 21:08:40 Reply Private Reply
#24: Vicomte13 To: goodnessmarlok (#22)
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-05-22 21:27:34 Reply Private Reply