"Mesa police said that none of the people in the photo wanted to press charges and "the case will be closed."

Every football player in the photo is shoulder to shoulder -- except the two in front of the pedophile. For some reason, they made room for him to expose himself.

How did that happen?

he did.

Wrong again.

...the Maricopa County Attorney's Office said Wednesday that it would not pursue the felony charge because "evidence does not establish a violation of the statute."

I'll tell you the same thing I told the other asshat.

No no evidence - no crime.

Stop whining.

Osborn, a member of Red Mountain High School's varsity football team, was also charged with a felony for furnishing harmful items to minors

Uh, no - he didn't furnish "harmful items to minors".

That would be the photographer, editor and anyone else involved in the production and/or distribution of the yearbook.

"he did." "Wrong again."

Anyone opening their yearbook saw him with his dick hanging out. So yes. He did.

No different than if he sent that photo over the Internet to every student in the school.

Anyone opening their yearbook saw him with his dick hanging out. So yes. He did.

...(the) "Evidence does not establish a violation of the statute."

No evidence, no crime.

Oh wait, I forgot who I'm talking with - the asshat who believes possessing cash is "evidence" of crime.

No evidence - no crime

Oh really? You don't think just one child under 15 saw his dick? Lay off the glass pipe, drug addict lover. The charges were dropped by libtard pressure. The perp was probably some important persons little child asshole... I guarantee the case would have won a preliminary hearing finding sufficient evidence that the exposure statute in Arizona was violated.

If I was on the jury it wouldn't need to be self defense. Not guilty.

Let the "anything goes bastard" suffer his own medicine. lol

Oh wait, I forgot who I'm talking with - the asshat who believes possessing cash is "evidence" of crime.

If the cash is a product of a crime, then yes, ITS CALLED EVIDENCE. Dumb dumb.

If the cash is a product of a crime, then yes, ITS CALLED EVIDENCE

Seriously? You're gonna go with that?

How many times have we seen uniformed thugs seize cash from motorists who have committed no crime?

Police Can Seize And Sell Assets Even When The Owner Broke No Law

Here's just one example out of dozens:

Cops Seize $107,000 From Couple, Didn’t Charge Them With A Crime But Kept The Money

In October 2012, Adam and Jennifer Perry of Massachusetts were pulled over in the state of Illinois on Interstate 80 for speeding. The couple was headed to Salt Lake City, Utah to see a hearing specialist for an ear infection Adam had.

A drug-sniffing dog was triggered off the scent of the car, inciting a search of the vehicle. No drugs or paraphernalia were found, but the officer did find $107,520 in a suitcase and the wallet of Jennifer Perry. No crime was committed, and no charges were ever filed against the Perrys, but the cash was seized and turned over to the federal government. Authorities used civil forfeiture laws to seize the money under presumptions the cash was tied to illegal activity.

Three years later, the Perrys are still in court fighting to get their money back. According to the Institute for Justice, a libertarian non-profit public interest legal organization, the couple wrote in a letter earlier this month, “Adam claims that the taken cash came from savings and disability settlements and payments.”

*****

How about one more :

DEA Steals $16,000 In Cash From Young Black Man, Because He Must Be A Drug Dealer

After scraping together enough money to produce a music video in Hollywood, 22-year-old Joseph Rivers set out last month on a train trip from Michigan to Los Angeles, hoping it was the start of something big.

Before he made it to California, however, Rivers fell victim to a legal form of government highway robbery.

Rivers changed trains at the Amtrak station in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on April 15, with bags containing his clothes, other possessions and an envelope filled with the $16,000 in cash he had raised with the help of his family, the Albuquerque Journal reports. Agents with the Drug Enforcement Administration got on after him and began looking for people who might be trafficking drugs.

Rivers said the agents questioned passengers at random, asking for their destination and reason for travel. When one of the agents got to Rivers, who was the only black person in his car, according to witnesses, the agent took the interrogation further, asking to search his bags. Rivers complied. The agent found the cash — still in a bank envelope — and decided to seize it on suspicion that it may be tied to narcotics. River pleaded with the agents, explaining his situation and even putting his mother on the phone to verify the story.

No luck.

“These officers took everything that I had worked so hard to save and even money that was given to me by family that believed in me,” Rivers told the Journal. “I told (the DEA agents) I had no money and no means to survive in Los Angeles if they took my money. They informed me that it was my responsibility to figure out how I was going to do that.”

Lay off the glass pipe, drug addict lover.

drug
autism

activism

savant
idiots

love
boris

Seriously? You're gonna go with that?

Yes, even the supreme Court "goes with that". Douche

Yes, even the supreme Court "goes with that".

You are seriously misinformed, as usual.

So you are saying that it is perfectly legal to seize cash without any evidence of a crime?

You really are a fascist at heart, aren't you?

1) You are seriously misinformed, as usual.

2) So you are saying that it is perfectly legal to seize cash without any evidence of a crime?

3) You really are a fascist at heart, aren't you?

1) misinformed? Shall I quote you upper court case law on how cash from a crime can be siezed as Evidence and sometimes forfeited? I don't make this shit up, bozo. It's fact.

2) I didn't say that at all... that's the yella spin you put on what you don't agree with. Of course there needs to be evidence of a crime before proceeds are confiscated or siezed. Nobody says otherwise, YOU JUST WANT THE SHEEP OF THIS FORUM TO THINK THAT'S THE NORM... to sell your pro drug AGENDA.

3) No... I'm a conservative that demands people take 100% responsibility for their actions. If they can't, then they should suffer the hole they dug themselves in. I don't want to pay to help them.

Of course there needs to be evidence of a crime before proceeds are confiscated or siezed.

Shall I quote you upper court case law on how cash from a crime can be siezed as Evidence and sometimes forfeited?

You effing moron, cops are seizing cash without any evidence of a crime.

What part of that does your feeble mind not comprehend?

How many times have we seen uniformed thugs seize cash from motorists who have committed no crime?

Police Can Seize And Sell Assets Even When The Owner Broke No Law

Here's just one example out of dozens:

Cops Seize $107,000 From Couple, Didn’t Charge Them With A Crime But Kept The Money

I'm done with you here pig-boy.

You effing moron, cops are seizing cash without any evidence of a crime.

Law enforcement siezes evidence literally millions of times a day across America. Go ahead and provide a few hundred examples of what YOU FEEL is cash siezed without probable cause.... then I'll tell you that your examples, if accurate, represent less than 1% of how much evidence is actually siezed on a daily bases.

I'm done with you here pig-boy

Whatever you say, criminal cocksucker.

I'll tell you that your examples, if accurate, represent less than 1% of how much evidence is actually siezed on a daily bases.

Well, you got one thing right anyways.

American Cops Now Steal More Property than All US Burglars

Between 1989 and 2010, U.S. attorneys seized an estimated $12.6 billion in asset forfeiture cases. The growth rate during that time averaged +19.4% annually. In 2010 alone, the value of assets seized grew by +52.8% from 2009 and was six times greater than the total for 1989.

Then by 2014, that number had ballooned to roughly $4.5 billion for the year, making this 35% of the entire number of assets collected from 1989 to 2010 in a single year. According to the FBI, the total amount of goods stolen by criminals in 2014 burglary offenses suffered an estimated $3.9 billion in property losses. This means that the police are now taking more assets than the criminals.

The police have been violating the laws to confiscate assets all over the country. A scathing report on California warns of pervasive abuse by police to rob the people without proving that any crime occurred.

Bloomberg News has reported now that Stop-and-Seize authority is turning the Police Into Self-Funding Gangs. They are simply confiscating money all under the abuse of this civil asset forfeiture where they do not have to prove you did anything. Prosecutors are now instructing police on how to confiscate money within the grey area of the law.

Cops Now Take More Than Robbers

Created in the early days of the nation's war on drugs, asset forfeiture was designed to grab the proceeds from drug kingpins. But most of the money now is grabbed from ordinary citizens. According to a study last year, about 80 percent of the time, seized property is taken from people who have never been charged with anything. That same study, by the Drug Policy Alliance, found wanton abuses in California cities. Police are not supposed to budget forfeiture proceeds, but they increasingly depend on the revenues to fund their operations.

criminal cocksucker.

You must be referring to the cops who STEAL money from citizens who have committed NO CRIME.

Go fuck yourself.

You must be referring to the cops who STEAL money from citizens who have committed NO CRIME

Just because you say that happens, doesn't make it true, AGENDA BOY. You'll only fool the sheep that follow you into believing that LE are knocking at random doors just seizing property for themselves.... so let's fire all the cops so you can be a worry free drug dealer, addict and scumbag.

If a man exposed himself to your kid would you not snap his neck?

This dumb ass over step prank to being a pervert!

... LE are knocking at random doors just seizing property for themselves ...

I beleive your perspective is true just as much as shit Trump happens on a daily basis.

You need to evaluate your warped way of thinking to change your low moral standards and stop the full concentration on your own self-dealing.

Ignore this advice at your own peril … I have spoken.

...the Maricopa County Attorney's Office said Wednesday that it would not pursue the felony charge because "evidence does not establish a violation of the statute."

County prosecutors forwarded the misdemeanor charges to the city of Mesa. In response, Mesa police said that none of the people in the photo wanted to press charges and "the case will be closed." T

I have spoken.

I HAVE SPOKEN !!!

...the Maricopa County Attorney's Office said Wednesday that it would not pursue the felony charge because "evidence does not establish a violation of the statute."

Why are you posting this? I not say that he should be prosecuted as a felony. I do, however, believe that a misdemeanor charge was appropriate.

13-1402. Indecent exposure; exception; classification
A. A person commits indecent exposure if he or she exposes his or her genitals or anus or she exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts and another person is present, and the defendant is reckless about whether the other person, as a reasonable person, would be offended or alarmed by the act.

Then let the little bastard spend a few weeks in Sheriff Joe’s Tent City. There are some “guys” there who would no doubt just love for him to pull his penis out for them …

I HAVE SPOKEN !!!

then I'll tell you that your examples, if accurate, represent less than 1% of how much evidence is actually siezed on a daily bases.

That very well may be true, but it wouldn't be much comfort to you if if were one of the 1%.

Look up the matter under "Sulphur LA" for example.

I do, however, believe that a misdemeanor charge was appropriate.

You "believe" wrongly.

County prosecutors forwarded the misdemeanor charges to the city of Mesa. In response, Mesa police said that none of the people in the photo wanted to press charges and "the case will be closed."

Then let the little bastard spend a few weeks in Sheriff Joe’s Tent City. There are some “guys” there who would no doubt just love for him to pull his penis out for them …

Attaboy - you'd like to see this kid raped.

Your sick sexual fantasies are on full display this morning.

Paultards

In case you haven't been keeping up with current events, Ron Paul has been out of office for several years.

It's amusing to see assclowns like you and GrandSphincter bandy that term around as if it's an insult.

Act your age gramps.

What is a "paultard" ...

Apparently it means "anyone who shows Gatlin to be a simpleton".

Ron Paul has been out of office for several years.

Unfortunately his disciples, the Paultards, are still active and spreading shit around everywhere. Therefore, the reference stands.

Since you are such a dedicated Paultard, perhaps you can answer a question. Why do so many Paultards now support Bernie when Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul are such complete opposites on the political spectrum? Is it more of a contrarian perspective that appeals … or did you all just change all of your economic views? I'm extremely curious.

Why do so many Paultards now support Bernie when Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul are such complete opposites on the political spectrum?

There is no evidence to support your ludicrous claim.

Shameful!

Absolutely, shameful ... that you are so ignorant.

You have to ASK that question ... after you donated $500 to his campaign?

Huh?

$500 bucks? I donated thousands of bucks. I told you this fact before. Why are you blinded by your hard headed potatoe skins?

tards, are still active and spreading shit around everywhere

Yes, he will hit this country like a bolt of lightning.

I am absolutely confident that he will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

You represent the Fascist state. I do not.

Why do so many Paultards now support Bernie when Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul are such complete opposites on the political spectrum?

There is no evidence to support your ludicrous claim.

Ludicrous claim you say ...

Bernie Sanders Is Clearly Capturing Part of the Ron Paul Student Vote - Libertarian students for avowed socialism.

The Ron Paul/Bernie Sanders Connection

Why do former Ron Paul supporters now support Bernie?

Ron Paul praises Bernie –

How I Evolved From a Ron Paul Supporter to a Bernie Sanders Supporter

… and many more.

Sorry, but you don't have a potatoe to stand on, in today's world.

Your links do nothing to back that claim.

How many is "so many"?

I'm sure there are some that do, however your claim is still without merit.

For example, your link to The Ron Paul/Bernie Sanders Connection has got nothing to do with former Paul supporters getting behind Sanders.

From your link :

...the demographics of Sanders’s support now and Ron Paul’s support four years ago are not all that different: Both candidates got much more support from younger voters than from older ones, from men than from women, from white voters than from nonwhite ones, and from secular voters than from religious ones. Like Sanders, Paul drew more support from poorer voters than from wealthier ones in 2012....

This article is about the similar demographics, not political philosophies.

Then your link to Bernie Sanders Is Clearly Capturing Part of the Ron Paul Student Vote is another bust.

He's likely capturing some of the non-interventionist, libertarian-leaning college-aged people who last time around would have supported Ron Paul -- another septuagenarian white man with a radical streak and surprising youth cred.

Once again - FAIL.

Then, after you have two strikes, you swing and miss on this one : Ron Paul praises Bernie – .

How dishonest of you to omit the rest of what it says, ...but Sanders’ supporters might not like the reason why.

Not surprising in the least, coming from you.

Finally, your last one - How I Evolved From a Ron Paul Supporter to a Bernie Sanders Supporter is so ridiculous it needs no rebuttal, but come on...ONE former Ron Paul supporter now supports Bernie?

You have posted nothing to support your original claim.

The fight for individual freedoms, liberties and rights beyond personal dignities goes on in a FASCIST state.

Gatlin cares not for the principles of freedom and liberty.

He'd prefer that we live in a fascist state where "dissenters" like you and me would be silenced....hence his support for Trump.

He (and the other Trumpettes) are looking for a daddy figure.

the FASCISM that you represent.

Orwellian
drug
skewed

backtrack
the
short
cut

dead
end
flip
flop
you
took
drug
tripping

love
boris

ps

brain
trauma
poisoning
shock

pss

learn
to
compensate
adjust

I won't turn you in.

freedom
isn't
denial
anarchy

reality
isn't
repression
tyranny

grow
SOBER
up

love
boris