This is the epitome of modern Orwellian America.
A group of 51 middle schoolers from North Carolina traveled all the way to the 9/11 memorial and decided to sing the national anthem.
They were stopped from singing the national anthem at the 9/11 memorial halfway through by 9/11 memorial security because, well, it seems they didnt have the proper permit.
You have to stop. This is considered a public demonstration! one of the guards of one of Disneyland of American false flag monuments with a $60 million/year operating budget shouted at kids who dont understand how misplaced their patriotism has become in modern America.
Even though the teacher had previously asked a security guard for verbal permission, that was not good enough. The teacher was supposed to apply for a permit, pay $35 in fees, and wait the requisite ten days so the kids would be granted the permission by the memorial staff to sing the national anthem.
The punchline?
Waynesville Middle School principal Trevor Putnam reportedly said the whole incident was a great lesson in civics, NOT because they could have discussed the First Amendment or destruction of the Bill of Rights, but then he could ask the kids Why are there limits put in place in public forums?
Why indeed.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheepleand a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
#1: Deckard To: Gatlin, misterwhite, Roscoe, GrandIsland (#0)
Well, the "law is the law", right guys?
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 08:51:21 Reply Private Reply
#2: Stoner To: Deckard (#1)
Whew, damn that was close. Thank God security was there to stop them.
Just imagine the chaos, mayhem, anarchy, and utter lawlessness that would have been unleashed if those little brats had not been stopped. Who knows, it might have resulted in the destruction of all life on the planet if the hero's had not been there to stop all of that felonious, dangerous law breaking!
Can you believe it, NO PERMIT ! Who ever the teacher in charge was, should have their ass kicked real good.
Considering the seriousness of the offense, the hero's should have just performed summary execution on the spot. After all, they would have been justified. /sarc
Give those hero's a hefty pay raise, some medals, a few boxes of "student killer bullets" and a few extra boxes of donuts.
Stoner posted on 2016-04-27 09:25:09 Reply Private Reply
#3: Roscoe To: Deckard (#1)
Quote it.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-27 09:58:54 Reply Private Reply
#4: Deckard To: Roscoe (#3)
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 10:04:59 Reply Private Reply
#5: Deckard To: Roscoe, misterwhite, Gatlin, GrandIsland (#3)
Hey - you clowns are the ones spouting "the law is the law" nonsense.
I'm sure you would agree that security acted appropriately in this case.
I'm betting you would have cheered if a thugscrum of cops had been released on these lawbreakers.
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 10:06:32 Reply Private Reply
#6: Deckard To: Stoner (#2)
Sure is great living in a "free country".
The kids learned a valuable lesson about tyranny.
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 10:08:18 Reply Private Reply
#7: Roscoe To: Deckard (#5)
It helps to know what you're talking about.
Quote it.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-27 10:10:54 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: Roscoe (#3)
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-27 10:21:16 Reply Private Reply
#9: Roscoe To: misterwhite (#8)
How does Deckhard manage to bat .000?
You would think that he would have get something right eventually, if by accident if nothing else.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-27 10:30:46 Reply Private Reply
#10: Gatlin To: Deckard, misterwhite, Roscoe, GrandIsland (#1)
Well, since you asked so nicely let me take a moment and see what the Bible says about obeying the law.
[ ... Tick, Tick, Tick -- Moment Passed ... ]
Okay, here it is. I find that Romans 13:1-7 makes it abundantly clear that God expects us to obey the laws of the government. This means that as a Christian, Deckard, you should you not promote disobeying the law or willfully breaking the laws of the country and you should take exception with anyone who does.
So, Deckard, as you continue on your journey down Hells path, I implore your to remember that it is not biblical to violate a law to achieve something you feel is good and it is reprehensible to subtlety or directly encourage anyone to choose the laws they would obey.
[ Can I get an AMEN? ]
By the way, Deckard, reading further on what Paul wrote I find that Romans 13:1-7 also gives the government the authority to punish lawbreakers. Whether the punishment is, it is within the rights of the government to determine.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 11:44:18 Reply Private Reply
#11: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe, misterwhite, GrandIsland (#5)
Do you consider quoting the Bible to be nonsense?
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 11:47:17 Reply Private Reply
#12: Pinguinite To: Gatlin (#11)
I would, if it's done to justify obeying laws that are immoral.
Pinguinite posted on 2016-04-27 12:00:20 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Deckard (#6)
We live in a country where the Rule of Law is the legal principle that law should govern, as opposed to being governed by arbitrary decisions from individuals to do what they choose we can do, or not do. This stands in contrast to autocracy, dictatorship, or oligarchy and your anarchy.
But. of course, you will not understand this ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 12:04:37 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: Pinguinite (#12)
For example?
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 12:05:59 Reply Private Reply
#15: Pinguinite To: Gatlin (#14)
I won't waste time giving examples of immoral laws. If you believe all laws are moral, that there has never in the history of civilization been an immoral law, then fine.
Pinguinite posted on 2016-04-27 12:14:22 Reply Private Reply
#16: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, the liar, Satanic preacher, Romans 13 1-7, Deckard (#11)
Misquoting the bible is worse than mere nonsense. Romans 13 refers to "legitimate" government and "law(s)" only. Since you don't understand the difference between good and evil government, you'll never "get it".
Get a Grip!
If Romans 13 does not mean "obey the State," what does it mean? Romans 13 means, "Remember them which have the rule over you," as you will also find at Hebrews 13:7. Since Paul was addressing the saints at Rome, it is logical that he would instruct them to submit to those who look after their souls. It is a reminder to be obedient to the authorities God has placed over His people. For they are truly the "ministers of God to thee for good." Unlike worldly rulers, God's ministers are not a terror to good works but to the evil. Therefore, "do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same."Romans 13:1-7
Powers Not Ordained By God
Romans 13 is probably the most devastating thing to a Christian in the hands of the ungodly. It sounds so convincing to obey those who appear to be in power. For too long, secular governments have used Romans 13 as a club to beat Christians into obedience to them. Just because a group maintains power through their guns and jails, does not mean God put them there.
God said there are powers not ordained by Him at Hosea 8:4, "They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not."
God didn't put them in power over the righteous. That's Satan's idea. The righteous don't need worldly, filthy authorities, which are no authorities at all. Do you think that they can instruct the righteous? They themselves steal. They themselves are perverts. And they presume to instruct the righteous? I don't think so.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-04-27 12:36:21 Reply Private Reply
#17: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#16)
Does Romans 13 say that YOU can decide which government and what laws are legitimate?
Why are you truth challenged?
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 12:46:54 Reply Private Reply
#18: Deckard To: Gatlin (#10)
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
The passage you cited has been abused by those in power for centuries, including the Nazi government.
Should We Obey Authority No Matter What?
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is coordinating with Christian ministers nationwide so that if the government imposes MARTIAL LAW the ministers will urge their flocks to OBEY the government.
A number of Christian leaders say that Christians must obey the government no matter what.
For example, Robert Deffinbaugh pastor at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas says:
This is not an unrealistic or abstract concept. After all, most churches in Nazi-era Germany supported the Nazis. The German clergy used the same rationale to support Hitler that many American churches are using today to demand obedience to authority Romans 13:
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 13:01:04 Reply Private Reply
#19: Gatlin To: Deckard (#18)
Sorry I could not get back to you sooner, I was listening to Trump's speech.
Do you hear it ... he was great, so presidential.
I felt like standing up and singing "God Bless America" when he finished.
I have to go now.
I recorded the speech ... I must listen to it again.
Later ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 13:13:34 Reply Private Reply
#20: Fred Mertz To: Gatlin (#19)
You can't sing.
Fred Mertz posted on 2016-04-27 13:14:54 Reply Private Reply
#21: Deckard To: Gatlin (#19)
Your urging Christians to lay down like sheep and obey government "no matter what" is blasphemous.
The Bible Urges Us to CHALLENGE Not Obey Bad Government
In reality, Christian (and Jewish) leaders throughout history have explained that we must disobey tyrannical governments.
The Book of Maccabees an ancient Jewish book purporting to document the events which Chanukah celebrates apparently says:
(Thomas Jefferson agreed.)
Gordan Runyan pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church points out numerous instances in the Bible of men and women who disobeyed their government rulers, and were rewarded by God and praised as holy.
Indeed, the Bible mentions justice more than almost any other topic. The Bible demands that we do justice and to stand up to ANYONE including the rich or powerful who do injustice or oppress the people.
Baptist minister Chuck Baldwin writes:
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 13:18:30 Reply Private Reply
#22: Deckard To: Fred Mertz (#20)
Apparently he can't read or comprehend facts either.
Deckard posted on 2016-04-27 13:19:37 Reply Private Reply
#23: tpaine To: Gatlin (#19)
I don't know who said that first, but he ought to be shot.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 13:29:57 Reply Private Reply
#24: Gatlin To: tpaine (#23)
Some say that any fellow who has another fellow in bed with him should be shot.
Some say that ...
What say you?
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 13:44:18 Reply Private Reply
#25: Gatlin To: Fred Mertz (#20)
You FINALLY got something RIGHT, Fred.
I can't sing ... that is why I said I "felt" like it, but did not.
I am so proud of you ... I now have hope in the future for you.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 13:47:38 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: Deckard (#22)
You have a huge PERCEPTION problem.
Gotta go now ... I must listen to Trump's speech again.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 13:49:32 Reply Private Reply
#27: Gatlin To: Pinguinite (#15)
Oh, I would not say there has never been an immoral law for I have seen that done.
I only asked you to cite an example where quoting the Bible justifies obeying a law that is immoral since I have never heard anyone do that.
And I would like to learn of an actual incident because I dont entertain hypotheticals reality in this world as it is, is vexing enough.
Reality in this world is vexing, right?
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 14:01:03 Reply Private Reply
#28: Pinguinite To: Gatlin (#27)
Then apparently we agree that immoral laws should not be obeyed. In which case, the bible ref is of no relevance.
Pinguinite posted on 2016-04-27 14:05:49 Reply Private Reply
#29: tpaine To: Gatlin, -- sings again (#24)
"Politics makes strange bedfellows."
I don't know who said that first, but he ought to be shot.
I'd say it's fine with me, -- but I doubt you'd say the same.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 14:07:25 Reply Private Reply
#30: tpaine To: Gatlin (#13)
Very odd and confused comment: ---
We live in a country where, --- arbitrary decisions from individuals choose - what -- we can do, or not do?
Are you 'all there'? -- As in cogent?
I'd say you're crazy as a loon.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 14:24:44 Reply Private Reply
#31: Gatlin To: tpaine (#30)
True ... and this needs to change.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 14:36:01 Reply Private Reply
#32: Gatlin To: tpaine (#30)
I'd say that you don't know what you are talking about ... as usual.
It is no insult to be called crazy as a loon. If loons could hire a lawyer, they could sue for defamation of character anyone who uses the phrase crazy as a loon. They are, in fact, very smart birds and have done very well in the never- ending struggle for existence with nature and man.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 14:43:25 Reply Private Reply
#33: Gatlin To: Pinguinite (#28)
Of course, as a US Air Force officer, I was permitted under Section 16c(1)(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to refuse to follow a general order or regulation that was contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it.
I could say that there is no "significant" bearing upon the point at hand. But, I could not rule out it being germane so as to imply "a fitness" for or appropriateness to the point.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 15:02:17 Reply Private Reply
#34: tpaine To: Gatlin (#31)
Very odd and confused comment: ---
We live in a country where, --- arbitrary decisions from individuals choose - what -- we can do, or not do?
Are you 'all there'? -- As in cogent?
I'd say you're crazy as a loon.
Even our Presidents, as individuals, cannot make such arbitrary decisions.
But perhaps you could cite an example, proving you're not Looney.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 15:36:22 Reply Private Reply
#35: BorisY To: Deckard (#0)
to
send
the
thought
minders
their
minions
to
another
country
of
their
liking
choosing
take
the
pc
facebooter
un
too
with
them
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2016-04-27 15:45:34 Reply Private Reply
#36: tpaine To: Gatlin (#33)
Here again we see your 'Looney' reasoning, unbecoming to an officer in the US Air Force.
IF (big if) you indeed were ever an officer, or even in the air force.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 15:45:40 Reply Private Reply
#37: Fred Mertz To: tpaine (#36)
Man, that's a low blow.
I'm sure tater will show us his DD214.
Fred Mertz posted on 2016-04-27 15:50:11 Reply Private Reply
#38: Gatlin To: Fred Mertz (#37)
I have no problem believing that you and tpaine know how to blow low ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 15:56:29 Reply Private Reply
#39: tpaine To: Fred Mertz, Y'ALL (#37)
IF (big if) you indeed were ever an officer, or even in the air force.
Gatty and I did this once before at LP, and he didn't show shit.
I hear he has a good falsetto when he sings for Trump tho..
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 16:02:55 Reply Private Reply
#40: BorisY To: Gatlin, toolconservative (#38)
gender
benders
freaks
love
boris
ps
toolcoolconservative
too
pss
canary
hack
attack
trolls
psss
obomba
outed
all
the
freaks
bernie
will
out
the
die
hards
willie green
especially
free
trains
BorisY posted on 2016-04-27 16:10:34 Reply Private Reply
#41: Fred Mertz To: tpaine (#39)
I pulled out my DD214 about six years ago when I applied for a cemetery reservation.
Other than that, it stays in my black box.
Fred Mertz posted on 2016-04-27 16:13:48 Reply Private Reply
#42: Gatlin To: tpaine, Fred Mertz, Y'ALL (#39)
Ahem ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 16:21:37 Reply Private Reply
#43: Gatlin To: BorisY (#40)
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 16:23:15 Reply Private Reply
#44: ConservingFreedom To: Gatlin (#19)
Have a link?
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-04-27 16:26:02 Reply Private Reply
#45: tpaine To: Fred Mertz (#41)
Gatty and I did this once before at LP, and he didn't show shit.
All I had when I signed up with VA heath care was my little pocket DD214. --- Surprisingly they pulled up a full sized copy in no time flat. --- Good luck if you as an individual try to get any more info out of records tho.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 16:26:34 Reply Private Reply
#46: Gatlin To: tpaine, Fred Mertz (#45)
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 16:29:56 Reply Private Reply
#47: tpaine To: Gatlin (#42)
What did you expect me to say to a sick woman who was ready to ban me?
Never did find out how much it cost you to get her to post that.. Got honesty?
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 16:39:31 Reply Private Reply
#48: Gatlin To: tpaine, Fred Mertz (#47)
I would have at one time expected you to be truthful and honorable.
But I no longer hold that expectation, since you have been blatantly exposed as a liar.
I now find it difficult and near impossible to associate with or post to anyone with such low character.
Gatlin posted on 2016-04-27 16:44:14 Reply Private Reply
#49: tpaine To: Gatlin (#48)
And I you, but that all changed when you took advantage of a dying confused old man, harrowup, and a dying woman, as above...
All you exposed was your ability to get Goldie to say she had your info.. SHE DID NOT VERIFY THAT YOU WERE AN OFFICER IN OUR ARMED SERVICES.
Associate? How weird. -- But sure, don't post if that turns you on. --- You'll once again join the fine company of clowns who can't rationally debate, and hide behind the bozo.
tpaine posted on 2016-04-27 17:03:21 Reply Private Reply
#50: GrandIsland To: Gatlin (#17)
No, Deckard has made it abundantly clear that only a Paultard is capable of deciding that.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-04-27 17:26:27 Reply Private Reply