Trump appears.. He has thrown a wrench in their plans and stopped their time-table. Now…they all depend on the news media to destroy Trump and that is what they have been trying to do. If you are voting for Trump…do not be discouraged. He is not out yet. Keep voting and campaigning. Remember…..if the Media hates him then it is a sign that he is the one to vote for. Stop the socialist juggernaut…vote Trump."

Great quote...

Wow

Love
boris

peoples who have done something represents the injustice of economic inequality which is to be cured by total confiscation and redistribution.

Let's get this straight, it is not all black and white, either way. The industral/military complex that has existed for almost two centuries has done great damage and destroyed poor nations. However observe what happens when the non-white races get hold of this power. What Japan did to China was inexcusable, what Japan did to south east asia was inexcusable. Japan and the US fought it out but this was a stouch between equals and guess what? the white race won. Observe what happened in the americas, the white races were/are a destructive force. You think these inferiors you speak of should not participate in the benefits of economic development? Those marxists you speak of were white, the non white races did not get the idea of ownership by the state for the benefit of all and why did they get this idea? because white men had exploited their own race, they weren't complaining about exploitation of others.

What I'm saying is you cannot complain becuase someone wants what you have

What I'm saying is you cannot complain becuase someone wants what you have

No,but you can damn sure complain when they demand you give it to them because they don't have it and feel like they are entitled to it.

The vast majority of the professional criminals in America today are black,yet the entire black population is only 13 percent of our population. To put this in the proper perspective,that 13 percent includes every man,woman,and child. Yet the majority of the black crimes are committed by black males between the ages of 12 and 35.

The vast majority of the professional criminals in America today are black

Ah yes the problem of the minority. I understand your frustration. Where I come from petty crime is perpertrated by the black population who are, as in your country, over represented in the prison population and they only represent 2-5% of the population, however the professional criminal class seems to be drawn from the immigrant population, lebanese and italian and other southern european. We have yet to observe the result of allowing Iraqi, Afghan and Syrian immigration but past experience suggests lack of assimilation and drift to crime. If seems that most persons associated with crimes of violence have muslim names.

I understand why Donald wants to lock the door, I feel the same way myself some times, however the real problem is with the people you already have and disadvantage plays a major role. Affirmative action programs can only do so much, whether it is a black population or any other disadvantaged group because you really have to target those on the lowest level and that might mean doing some things that cause problems like slum redevelopment, forced resettlement, subsidy to establish businesses in those areas that will employ blacks, not a lot of votes in it and that is why it doesn't get done

What I'm saying is you cannot complain becuase someone wants what you have

What I'm saying is that if I find a way, I will damned sure kill them when they try to steal it from me.

Affirmative action programs can only do so much,

And 99 percent of it is negative because it gives the "favored class" huge advantages that others don't have,and even penalizes them by giving less-qualified non-whites jobs or favor they have worked for and deserve.

In other words,it makes racial prejudices worse than ever instead of healing them. The blacks and other minorities come to see the favor as nothing that isn't due to them just for not being born white,and the whites that work their asses off see themselves,and rightly so, as victims of racial discrimination.

There are probably more racists today in the United States that at any time in our history,and it is all do to affirmative action and other special privileges.

And 99 percent of it is negative because it gives the "favored class" huge advantages that others don't have,and even penalizes them by giving less-qualified non-whites jobs or favor they have worked for and deserve.

In other words,it makes racial prejudices worse than ever instead of healing them. The blacks and other minorities come to see the favor as nothing that isn't due to them just for not being born white,and the whites that work their asses off see themselves,and rightly so, as victims of racial discrimination.

Jews make out like bandits under the system, they are vastly over represented at places like Harvard but they get counted as whites, so white gentiles take an even bigger hit. If we're going to have AA the Jews need their own column. They more than any other group have been pushing this war on whitey, they should have the honor of participating in the scheme.

Jews make out like bandits under the system, they are vastly over represented at places like Harvard but they get counted as whites, so white gentiles take an even bigger hit. If we're going to have AA the Jews need their own column. They more than any other group have been pushing this war on whitey, they should have the honor of participating in the scheme.

I agree. They even take joy out of rubbing everyone else's nose in it. Mention it and they suddenly become Semites,but Semites that marry white blonde women like homeboys from the hood.

I predict this will change and they will accept the responsibilities they lay upon the rest of us at roughly the same time the sun starts rising in the west.

No one can ever mention this in public or they will be called "Nazi's".

Almost makes you wonder why they have been targets in every culture they have lived in for the last couple of thousand years,huh?

Almost makes you wonder why they have been targets in every culture they have lived in for the last couple of thousand years,huh?

If they were pulling the same crap in Europe that they've pulled over here it kind of explains certain aspects of European history a little better.

Almost makes you wonder why they have been targets in every culture they have lived in for the last couple of thousand years,huh?

If they were pulling the same crap in Europe that they've pulled over here it kind of explains certain aspects of European history a little better.

Well,they were,but it was not as one-sided as most people may think. Jews became bankers because the Vatican ruled it out for Christians,and European Royalty ruled out certain jobs and occupations for Jews. They could become tradesmen,but most times they needed a Gentile front man from the nobility in order to buy property. Which means the property was bought using Jewish money,but titled to the Gentile nobleman. Guess what usually happened.

One case of Jews lending money to Gentile Royalty that highlights what sometimes happened was the current King of England had to borrow money to equip a army to invade France once again because his coffers were a little low. Which was one reason WHY he needed to invade France.

Anyhow,the report I read had the King borrowing money from a Jewish banker that could manage to arrange the loan with other Jewish bankers in other countries,and the deal would be he would be paid back with interest from the looted treasuries of France,and then he and his family would be put on a boat and sent to mainland Europe along with the money. This was a known condition of the deal,and Jewish witnesses had to see the banker and his family setting sail or the King would have never been able to ever borrow any money again.

What ended up happening was the ship sailed around until low tide when a sand bar in the English Channel was dry,and then they put the Jewish banker and his family in a row boat,and left them stranded on the sand bar until the tide came in and drowned them. The chests with the gold came back to England,and were landed and unloaded secretly.

So it is really more of a "which came first,the chicken or the egg" thing when it comes to devious dealings in Olde Europe. Let's face it,most of the Royalty of Europe were scum squared and the Jews had no choice but to do business with them. What happened to people in medieval Europe that said "No!" to Kings?

So the Jewish bankers made the loans to keep from being murdered,and then if the King or the other Royal didn't pay it back with interest as agreed,the bankers had to get their money back by squeezing it out of the Gentile merchant classes.

Also,the Jews were pretty much forced to live in Jewish ghettos by Royalty,and then the common people like the Gentile Merchants resented them for being "stand offish and sticking with their kind". There really wasn't any way possible for a Jew to win back then. They just had to dance between the notes and hope for the best while being ready to run for their lives at any moment. Jews have good historical reasons for being paranoid and suspicious of their fellow man.

because it gives the "favored class" huge advantages

Agreed, I am against affirmative action because it mandates a decent into mediocracy. Affirmative action does not mean the most skilled or able get the jobs, it can actually mean there are those employed who are not fit for the role. It is in fact an attempt to solve social problems brought about by incorrect action whether that be migration, racial inequality, physical disadvantage.

What is truely needed is not placing individuals by quota whether that be employment or representation but addressing the root causes of disadvantage

What is truely needed is not placing individuals by quota whether that be employment or representation but addressing the root causes of disadvantage

What if the root cause of the problem is simple genetically based stupidity. Would you still address it?

What if the root cause of the problem is simple genetically based stupidity. Would you still address it?

If you believe in IQ tests, overwhelming majority in EVERY race is pretty dumb.

Not every Englishman is like Isaac Newton.

familair with statistics but what does this imply?

Is it an IQ test question?

If you believe in IQ tests, overwhelming majority in EVERY race is pretty dumb.

You just keep believing that if it makes you feel better about yourself,bubba.

If you believe in IQ tests, overwhelming majority in EVERY race is pretty dumb.

You just keep believing that if it makes you feel better about yourself,bubba.

Believing in what? In IQ tests, or that overwhelming majority in EVERY race is pretty dumb?

Being smart starts with with "gathers, infers own information", and key word is "starts". You need to be several points to the right to go beyond "starting" threshold. All others "know" what they are being told. Look at the graph below:

No, are you implying all of these groups have equal IQ, I think that boat sailed a long time ago

I don't imply that at all. What I say is that difference between average white (or black) and Isaac Newton is huge.

Civilization is created by a small minority. And it takes many centuries before followers can absorb it. Much longer time than average IQ needs to shift to the right (or left).

The distribution curve indicates what was the biological optimum to leave more descendents in a given environment. Eskimo and head hunters had to have very high IQ (ability to solve puzzles) to pass their genes on. The race can shift quite fast as every breeder of dog's races can tell you. In is enough for a few generations for the smart whites to have fewer children, and slow ones to have more for the balance to change.

Among Jews, ability to solve fine points of Talmud was at premium, while for the African blacks the stamina, socializing skills and ability to have several women was at premium (and being liable to be sold by its own tribe to America). It is dynamic as natural selection (reproduction differential) never stops.

Believing in what? In IQ tests, or that overwhelming majority in EVERY race is pretty dumb?

That the overwhelming majority in EVERY race is pretty dumb. Just because someone may not be smart enough to become a physicist,that doesn't mean they are dumb. Nor does having an IQ over 140 or so mean you know everything there is to know.

I do agree with your premise that some groups,like the Jews, tend to have higher IQ's than other groups due to cultural reasons,such as a cultural tendency to value intelligence over brawn and to even look for intelligence in mates. Slow-witted people in those groups are less likely to add to that groups DNA pool due to natural selection.

What I don't see on your charts are Asians,and am wondering why. No,I am NOT accusing you of racism or even implying it. I'm just curious why such a huge chuck of the world population isn't even mentioned.

Eskimo and head hunters had to have very high IQ (ability to solve puzzles) to pass their genes on.

I disagree,and in fact think they have to be little more than mindless drones to live in such primitive societies for hundreds,or even thousands,of years and still be stuck on "backwards". There has obviously been a lot of inbreeding going on between the Eskimos for all this time,and even though the gene pool has been quite a bit deeper for headhunters,you have to breed with other to increase your tribal intelligence,not eat them.

The term that comes to mind for both groups is "stuck on stupid".

What I don't see on your charts are Asians,and am wondering why. No,I am NOT accusing you of racism or even implying it. I'm just curious why such a huge chuck of the world population isn't even mentioned.

Perhaps because we cannot write about everything?

Which Asians do you have in mind? Persians, Chinese, Hindu or perhaps Mongols?

I disagree,and in fact think they have to be little more than mindless drones to live in such primitive societies for hundreds,or even thousands,of years and still be stuck on "backwards".

Getting food in two months for the whole year and making tools without metals or wood is quite hard.

Yes, did not develop agriculture or banking industry or even universities. I wonder why, low IQ? :)

lso,the Jews were pretty much forced to live in Jewish ghettos by Royalty,and then the common people like the Gentile Merchants resented them for being "stand offish and sticking with their kind". There really wasn't any way possible for a Jew to win back then. They just had to dance between the notes and hope for the best while being ready to run for their lives at any moment. Jews have good historical reasons for being paranoid and suspicious of their fellow man.

And (following your beliefs) given that God is just a superstition anyway, the Jewish woes were self-inflicted, because all they had to do was convert from one religion that was a myth to another that is also a myth, and then they would be people like everybody else.

Of course, then they would lose their banking monopoly. What to do...what to do...?

They chose to be rich and imperiled rather than simply join the masses. They stood aloof, and thus were despised by those "beneath" them, and got rich on the special banking privilege, but were periodically fleeced by those above them.

In the English banking case, the better answer would have been to simply give to the King and convert, in exchange for a lordship somewhere. There would have been rejoicing throughout the land, the King's financial problems would have been solved without resort to larceny, and the ex- Jews now-gentry would have had land that was theirs, and could have made money the usual way.

If religion isn't real, to hold out against the ruling class's religion is stupid. Convert to the religion that gives you the best deal.

What I don't see on your charts are Asians,and am wondering why

I find it curious his chart compares blacks and whites, as if black given the centuries of education and opportunity won't conform

Convert to the religion that gives you the best deal.

Under that deal we wouldn't convert to catholicism, would we, a group that comprises many of the poor of the world, or to islam for similiar reasons

familair with statistics but what does this imply?

Half of the people you'll ever meet are below average...
but fortunately, the other half are all above average...
It all balances out in the long run!

without an ordinate and abcissa the graph is meaningless.

You are grasping at straws.

Which Asians do you have in mind? Persians, Chinese, Hindu or perhaps Mongols?

The Asian ones,not the Indo-European ones.

Getting food in two months for the whole year and making tools without metals or wood is quite hard.

Not really. They had done it for thousands of years before the white man showed up to build houses and boats for them,and to feed them in hard times.

es, did not develop agriculture or banking industry or even universities. I wonder why, low IQ? :)

Thousands of years of inbreeding,and stuck on stupid. Yeah,there are exceptions,but damn few.

And (following your beliefs) given that God is just a superstition anyway, the Jewish woes were self-inflicted, because all they had to do was convert from one religion that was a myth to another that is also a myth, and then they would be people like everybody else.

Many did,especially in Spain.

Or at least pretended to convert.

They chose to be rich and imperiled rather than simply join the masses. They stood aloof, and thus were despised by those "beneath" them, and got rich on the special banking privilege, but were periodically fleeced by those above them.

There were no innocents in medieval times,least of all within the Evil Empire known as the Catholic Church.

In the English banking case, the better answer would have been to simply give to the King and convert, in exchange for a lordship somewhere.

I am not so sure the English gave them that option. I know the Spanish did. I suspect most of the Jews that managed to convert to the CC,or later,the Church of England got the opportunity because one of the Jewish females married a English noble,and he pulled the strings to get her family converted. Just guessing on this one,though. For all I know the English accepted anybody that wanted to convert,or accepted no one at all.

Convert to the religion that gives you the best deal.

The way the Catholics and the Muslims did it,was "convert or die". You should be sooooo proud!

I find it curious his chart compares blacks and whites, as if black given the centuries of education and opportunity won't conform

Well,for the most part,they still haven't. Africa would still be starving and having tribal warefare even today if the hated white man didn't keep feeding them and treating their illnesses.

Yes,there are exceptions,but not many when considering the total number.

Half of the people you'll ever meet are below average... but fortunately, the other half are all above average...

We would all like to think that wouldn't have to be explained,wouldn't we?

And we would still be wrong.

Which Asians do you have in mind? Persians, Chinese, Hindu or perhaps Mongols?

The Asian ones,not the Indo-European ones.

What about Hungarians and Finns? They are not Indo-Europeans. Turks or Semites are neither.

Your pigment deprived ancestors lived in dugouts and whacked one another in berserk fury when East (like Chinese) and West Asians (Persians or Phoenicians) had high civilizations. Was the race a factor? Did you mutate?

What about Hungarians and Finns? They are not Indo-Europeans. Turks or Semites are neither.

Last time I checked,they are Europeans.

Your pigment deprived ancestors lived in dugouts and whacked one another in berserk fury when East (like Chinese) and West Asians (Persians or Phoenicians) had high civilizations.

Who were my ancestors,dummy?

Was the race a factor?

Genetics were and always will be a factor.

Did you mutate?

I know you are Polish,but there is no need for you to promote the false stereotype. Learning big words doesn't mean you understand them.

If the wealth is a measure of intelligence, how rich are you?

I would try to explain this to you,but you wouldn't understand.

Africa would still be starving and having tribal warefare even today if the hated white man didn't keep feeding them and treating their illnesses.

Yes,there are exceptions,but not many when considering the total number.

Spoken like a true bigot, only a few centuries ago the white race was in the same position fighting endless wars and starving and yet the african have had liberty for a few decades and you demand they operate at your standard

Spoken like a true bigot, only a few centuries ago the white race was in the same position fighting endless wars and starving and yet the african have had liberty for a few decades and you demand they operate at your standard

BullBarack!Independent African Kingdoms existed for thousands of years before the white man ever moved there and semi-civilized the place,and the majority of Africans are no better off OR more advanced now than they were then. The biggest difference is for the most part you aren't eating each other even though raping babies to cure VD is still a popular passtime.

Africa became more civilized the few hundred years the white man was dominant there than they were all the thousands of years before the white man came,and all you have done since the white man left was lose ground. And no amount of playing the race card can change that.

without an ordinate and abcissa the graph is meaningless.

You are grasping at straws.

Criticizing a graph that has no labels at its borders to indicate what, and how much of what, it represents is grasping at straws?

Under that deal we wouldn't convert to catholicism, would we, a group that comprises many of the poor of the world, or to islam for similiar reasons

If you were a Jew in England in 1200, Catholicism was the only choice on offer.

While we speak of converting the jews, the inquisition was to examine the jews who were siad to have been converted, however, many others were caught in the net. The Catholic Church was quilty of genocide in France and other places and don't tell me that was the acts of individuals