Today, we will know if the Establishment want a civil war
Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls, by the end of today, we will know if the Establishment want a civil war, for today, New Jersey will rule whether or not to put Lyin, Cheatin' Illegal Alien Rafael ted Cruz on their Republican primary ballot.
The Constitution of the United States Article two, section 1, clause 5 is clear that he is not. Previous supreme court rulings defining Natural Born Citizen, make it clear that Cruz is not.
If Judge Jeff Masin rules that NJ is to put Cruz' name on the ballot than the Establishment, the ruling political class and their masters in the Donor Class, are telling us they want and are prepared for a Civil War. For they know that we realize that if we loose the fight to make Donald John Trump President, that we have then only two choices, Civil War or resolve ourselves to a life of slavery for ourselves and our prodigy.
The below was taken, in part, from Still Report #783, the video is embedded at the bottom.
Law professor, Victor Williams, says that Senator Ted Cruz has fraudulently claimed to be eligible to be President of the United States, when he is not.
New Jersey Judge Jeff Masin heard oral arguments the morning of Monday April 11th, 2016 on whether Cruz should be returned to the June 7, 2016 New Jersey Republican Primary ballot or not, after having his name pulled from the ballot last week by New Jersey Secretary of State, Kim Guadagno.
Williams, who teaches at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., says that Cruz must prove that he is a natural-born U.S. citizen, but Cruz has had his birth records sealed. Professor Williams says the burden of proof is on Cruz to show that he is a natural-born citizen, not on the state to prove that he is not .
Although ignored by over 90% of the mainstream media, the hearing is a very serious matter. Should Cruz lose this battle, he would likely have to drop out of the remaining primary races, and ultimately quit the race entirely. This would throw the Republican presidential contest up into the air for a thorough reshuffling, leaving Donald Trump, the current top vote getter and apparent peoples choice, the likely victor.
“Cruz committed ballot access fraud in each state when he falsely swore that he was a ‘natural born’ American citizen.” Cruz has pushed aside all calls for him to prove that he was a natural-born citizen in the past, saying only that the issue is "settled law".
Professor Williams is a write-in Presidential candidate in at least 8 states. This gives him standing to haul Cruz before a judge to determine whether Cruz is a natural-born citizen – the Constitutional requirement to become either President or Vice-President of the United States of America.
Rather than accepting Cruz’s ballot petition when filed last week, Secretary of State Guadagno scheduled the Administrative Law hearing to make the Canadian-born Cruz finally answer the charges that have swirled around his candidacy since day one. Professor Williams says he will also challenge Cruz’s ballot eligibility in Maryland, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington, California, Montana, and South Dakota.
According to Williams, “Cruz has fraudulently represented himself as constitutionally qualified for the office of president.” He argues that Cruz did not even become a naturalized citizen until 2014. And without showing proof that he did indeed became naturalized in or before 2014, may not be in the US legally.
So the question is, if Senator Cruz was a natural-born U.S. citizen, then he certainly would not have needed to go through the process of naturalization. According to NBC News, Professor Williams’ arguments were dismissed last week in a Pennsylvania Court: “… because the court said the challenger in that case did not have standing to sue.”
However, in New Jersey and the other seven states professor Williams has now filed in to run for President, he does have legitimate standing because write-in candidates are considered as "genuine opposition". According to Williams, that gives him the strongest standing possible to challenge Cruz.
Williams says that he will carry his battle to the Republican National Convention in July in Cleveland if need be, by challenging the seating of all Ted Cruz delegates on the basis of his ineligibility to pursue the highest office in the land.
New Jersey Judge Jeff Masin said that he will announce his decision on Cruz's eligibility tomorrow, Tuesday, April 12.
Prof. Williams website: victorwilliamsforpresident.com< /a>
Poster Comment:
What is Judge Masin waiting for?
#1: Vicomte13 To: BobCeleste (#0)
Let's come down off the ledge.
The NJ judge will put him on the ballot, because there is no controlling legal authority, and by ruling against Cruz the judge, in one fell swoop, would be declaring Cruz ineligible and Obama illegitimate, thereby alienating BOTH political parties, without the Supreme Court or any other court to back him up.
Judges are not that brave.
This judge will surely rule that Cruz can be on the ballot, or sidestep the direct question with a procedural trick so he doesn't have to answer it.
Cruz will be on the ballot, and he'll either win or lose. There will be no civil war either way. If Cruz is on the ballot and the Republican establishment steals the nomination from Trump, the Democrats will win the general election. They will legitimately hold the White House for at least 4 years, and people will accept that.
The Republican Party will have a political civil war and never recover. Having seen the corruption this time in the open, it is clear that no reform can ever come from Republicans. If Trump is defeated, you will see a third party emerge that will replace the Republicans on the right.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-04-12 11:13:30 Reply Private Reply
#2: BobCeleste To: Vicomte13 (#1)
BobCeleste posted on 2016-04-12 12:37:42 Reply Private Reply
#3: tomder55 To: BobCeleste (#0)
This birther nonsense is so tedious.
tomder55 posted on 2016-04-12 12:45:57 Reply Private Reply
#4: Tooconservative To: tomder55 (#3)
I'm surprised Trump isn't doing more Birther stuff. He has before.
And more of his Truther stuff too.
Trump loves all the crackpottery he can dish up to the rubes.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-12 13:34:53 Reply Private Reply
#5: rlk To: tomder55 (#3)
During that period standard written, and oft verbal, discourse required highly refined use of language, of which Natural Born was a part. It marked someone as an educated man of qualty. The meaning of Natural Born was understood then, but (usually intentionally) not understood now.
rlk posted on 2016-04-12 15:35:39 Reply Private Reply
#6: BorisY To: tomder55 (#3)
I
would
say
by
the
review
of
the
constitution
ussc
because
of
evolution
affirmative
action
toilet
paper
handy
wipes
have
more
value
now
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2016-04-12 15:48:19 Reply Private Reply
#7: nolu chan To: BobCeleste (#0)
If past is prologue, here is how Judge Masin ruled in 2012 in Purpura v Obama, also featuring attorney Mario Apuzzo.
nolu chan posted on 2016-04-12 15:50:11 Reply Private Reply
#8: nolu chan To: tomder55 (#3)
I once honestly thought it would be over with after Obama was inaugurated in 2009.
nolu chan posted on 2016-04-12 16:00:18 Reply Private Reply
#9: BorisY To: nolu chan (#8)
the
moses
of
the
nile
reds
ebonics
rap
whine
rhyme
you
can't
be
grafted
if
you
chop
the
tree
down
plastics
toys
dolls
clowns
love
boris
ps
enjoy
your
charade
while
you
can
BorisY posted on 2016-04-12 16:27:56 Reply Private Reply
#10: nolu chan To: BorisY (#9)
Obama... born in Hawaii... natural born U.S. citizen... lousy president.
nolu chan posted on 2016-04-12 17:22:16 Reply Private Reply
#11: BorisY To: nolu chan (#8)
nolu
ebonics
zulu
chan
amused
still
how
much
of
this
magic
negro
chains
hoax
yes
we
con
war
on
civilization
country
Christianity
magician
can
you
stand
love
boris
ps
if
you
don't
see
it
it
isn't
happening
pss
probably
why
too
your
agenda
costumes
match
BorisY posted on 2016-04-12 17:25:29 Reply Private Reply
#12: BorisY To: nolu chan (#10)
According
to
the
constitution
senate
qualifications
were
open
to
any
body
presidential
qualifications
were
both
parents
higher
love
boris
ps
anchor
baby
bs
pss
How
can
you
take
an
oath
to
preserve
protect
something
you
don't
believe
in
even
hate
that
doesn't
matter
too
try
to
explain
the
African
Marxist
anti Christ
anti west
anti white
racist
father/religion
BorisY posted on 2016-04-12 17:36:27 Reply Private Reply
#13: BorisY To: nolu chan (#10)
The law is based on the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment which is a corollary to Article II, Section 1. They fit together nicely: anyone who is a Citizen of the United States At Birth under the 14th Amendment is also a natural born citizen under Article II, Section 1.
Nope. Not even a constitutional amendment can redefine the concept of a "natural citizen" as informed by the natural law philosophy the founders relied upon to create the nation. It makes as much sense as redefining "pi."
No, "Natural citizen" is a concept independent of modification. It is in effect, a "natural law" constant, no different from the speed of light or the charge on an electron.
Only liberal sophists think they get away with tampering with natural law. They only end up making a mess of it. Again, I point out "gay" marriage.
What we have nowadays is a cohort of judges and lawyers who are too ignorant to understand that they don't understand something, and too stupid to realize that they should.
Our judicial system has become the perfect storm of kookery, but with all the trappings of "authority."
75 posted on 4/12/2016 3:25:33 PM by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3420279/posts?q=1&;page=51#75
Our judicial system has become ... the perfect storm of kookery --- with all the trappings of "authority."
Bruce
jenner
is
a
woman
too
love
boris
ps
paste
vs
diamonds
you
get
plastic
unicorns
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2016-04-12 22:40:22 Reply Private Reply