When House Speaker Paul D. Ryan released a video laying out his familiar theme that politics should be fought on ideas and issues, the Drudge Reports headline was: Paul Ryan launches his first campaign ad.A dream of some Republicans is that Mr. Ryan will rescue them from a fiasco in the presidential election. That is unlikely. As states assemble delegates for the party convention, there are already demands that no votes be cast for someone who did not run.
It would be rational to turn to Gov. John Kasich of Ohio or Mr. Ryan, who might win the election, but neither the season nor the Republican grass roots seem to reward rationality.
Prior to the US War Between the States, the Whig party was the "conservative branch" of political ideals and principles. It morphed to the Know Nothing party and then some jerk grabbed Abe Lincoln to form the Republican party that later created the War between the States.
Today, we are seeing the demise of the Republican Party. It is the TERRORIST PARTY, now. I am glad to see the Republican carcass be kicked to the wayside. Vote Scruffy in 2016!
#1: Tooconservative To: buckeroo (#0)
Drudge has become a Trump propaganda mill. It's blatant.
I wonder how much Trump paid him to destroy his own reputation. I know Drudge's influence has waned over the years as other internet venues have risen. I suppose this is just how he cashes out on his franchise.
No. The Know Nothings were the American Party. If they were around today, they would be Pat Buchanan and Donald Trump. Know Nothings were anti-Irish immigrants, anti-Chinese immigrants. They had much of the such rhetoric you hear from Buchanan and Trump. The Whigs of the era were not nearly as anti-immigrant.
So you might draw some parallels with this modern campaign but Whigs were not Know Nothings. In the modern context, the Know Nothings would be the Reform Party, the same party Buchanan ran as for prez under. And the same party that Trump toyed with running for prez under several times, some years back.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-11 06:23:39 Reply Private Reply
#2: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#1)
TC loving his TC.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-11 06:36:41 Reply Private Reply
#3: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#1)
Truly, thou art a disciple worthy of Lying Ted.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/04/drudge-report-still-dominant- 205182#ixzz45Vse6b7v
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-11 06:43:23 Reply Private Reply
#4: Tooconservative To: Roscoe (#3)
It will not be forgotten who has helped Trump destroy the GOP as the conservative party in America. Because there is nothing remotely conservative about Trump. This is why so few party officials will campaign with him or endorse him.
The talk radio hosts are facing a similar choice.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-11 06:47:34 Reply Private Reply
#5: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#4)
And how much is your opinion worth?
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-11 06:52:43 Reply Private Reply
#6: Tooconservative To: Roscoe (#5)
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-11 07:03:48 Reply Private Reply
#7: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#6)
You were caught lying about Drudge's influence. I wasn't.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-11 07:37:34 Reply Private Reply
#8: Tooconservative To: Roscoe (#7)
It gets more blatant by the day. However, the pattern has been there for months already and many others noticed and commented on it. No one made a stink because Drudge has been such a fixture on the Right for so long.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-11 08:08:35 Reply Private Reply
#9: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#8)
Nope, that's just more of your disingenuous rhetorical spin.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-11 08:12:10 Reply Private Reply
#10: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#1)
I'm guessing less than Cruz paid National Review to go after Trump.
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-11 08:18:57 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#10)
No one had to pay them a dime. They hated his guts from day one.
Buckley on Trump (RedState):
When Buckley labels Trump a demagogue, it would be comparable to opinions he expressed about Pat Buchanan years back, another Reform Party candidate.
BTW, you guys do recall that Trump is an old Reform Party candidate for prez, don't you?
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-11 08:49:03 Reply Private Reply
#12: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#11)
I recall that he formed an exploratory committee, but not that he was an official candidate.
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-11 09:23:22 Reply Private Reply
#13: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#11)
Seems to me we need a businessman as President. Career politicians certainly aren't hacking it.
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-11 09:26:54 Reply Private Reply
#14: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#13)
Anything Saint Buckley ever said is still gospel truth to the crew at National Review. That is all I was demonstrating.
They still celebrate their weird little Buckley holidays too (birth, death, etc.). It's a Buckley cult over there, has been for a long time, even before he died. If he ever called Buchanan a fascist or Trump a demagogue (and he did), then that's the position of National Review for all time.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-11 09:59:07 Reply Private Reply