Poster Comment:
Ted I wish it wasn't true.
| Source: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW2B7Ky-0dk |
| Published: | Mar 29, 2016 |
| Author: | Ted Cruz under Carlys dress |
| Post Date: | 2016-03-29 00:28:04 by A K A Stone |
| Views: | 3412 |
Poster Comment:
Ted I wish it wasn't true.
#1: A K A Stone To: tomder55, nottooconservative (#0)
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 00:30:00 Reply Private Reply
#2: Logsplitter To: A K A Stone (#1)
Logsplitter posted on 2016-03-29 00:50:55 Reply Private Reply
#3: A K A Stone To: Logsplitter (#2)
Sarah Isgur Flores
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 01:05:46 Reply Private Reply
#4: A K A Stone To: All (#3)
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 01:14:58 Reply Private Reply
#5: nolu chan To: A K A Stone (#4)
https://twitter.com/ramzpaul/status/713487093100580864
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TimetoRethinkTed?src=hash
nolu chan posted on 2016-03-29 01:18:47 Reply Private Reply
#6: A K A Stone To: nolu chan (#5)
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 01:22:12 Reply Private Reply
#7: A K A Stone To: tooconservative (#6)
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 01:23:48 Reply Private Reply
#8: redleghunter To: A K A Stone (#0)
redleghunter posted on 2016-03-29 01:37:43 Reply Private Reply
#9: A K A Stone To: redleghunter (#8)
Ted didn't deny the affair.
Amanda said the photo with condoms was photoshopped.
To bad it is on her instagram page still.
She is deleting tweets.
They have the same temp tattoo.
Did you watch the video. How does Carly know what went on?
I think it passes the smell test and Cruz is guilty.
Trump is an adulterer too.
But he admitted it.
The Daily Mail who was asking questions isn't social media.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 01:46:29 Reply Private Reply
#10: tomder55 To: A K A Stone, redleghunter, Too Conservative (#1)
This is actually old news reported as early as September from a transaction in June of last year . To be technical ,it was one Pac giving money to a rival Pac. That is suspicious in itself....enough so that the FEC sent Cruz' Pac a letter asking for an explanation. I do not know if they complied with the FEC ;but if not then I'm sure the FEC has opened an investigation. It could be as simple as doing a favor to Fiorina that will be repaid at another time. It's common for one candidate to help pay off another's debt if they are going to team up.
The assumption is that this is hush money . But there are other explanations that have been advanced. Kellyanne Conway ,President of 'Keep the Promise' Pac explained that the donation went to Fiorina's Pac because "we thought she had some important things to say that weren't being heard ,including her poignant and effective criticism of Mrs. Clinton,at the time ,the likely Democratic nominee." Now the Carly Pac has been complicit in some dirty tricks like the use of photos of Melania Trump in controversial campaign ads.It could be that Cruz is using Fiorina's resources (and his own $$ donated to Fiorina) to do the dirty work while denying involvement in the gutter campaign. That has been SOP in campaigns in this country from the founding .Jefferson ,Adams both used surrogates while appearing to be above it. Since there is supposed to be no coordination between PACs and candidates ,there is instant deniability
If that was hush money then Fioria is playing her part to the T . She campaigns with Cruz and supports his candidacy . There has been talk that she would be his Veep choice if he won the nomination.That also makes sense since Fiorina's campaign from the start looked like a VP run.
tomder55 posted on 2016-03-29 06:04:38 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: tomder55 (#10)
Not a bad explanation.
The PAC's donors (or donor) may have had their own agenda. The hired guns who run the PAC's day-to-day operations don't just to keep the money when the candidate drops out. I don't think any of the PAC's ever return the money to the donor(s) but I think they are expected to use it as the donor(s) direct them to.
How these PACs operate in these various situations is something not well understood by the public.
Paying down debt is a good way to get an endorsement (which Cruz did) or to get the dropout candidate to swing their delegates over.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-03-29 06:24:51 Reply Private Reply
#12: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#4)
Roscoe posted on 2016-03-29 07:11:18 Reply Private Reply
#13: Stoner To: A K A Stone (#0)
To add to the circus, Ted should have had Beck & his toadys there crying and such.
Stoner posted on 2016-03-29 08:31:26 Reply Private Reply
#14: randge To: Stoner (#13)
I'm sure whoever deploys him must have an extensive list of potential targets. Weepin' Glen is an expensive asset. His security budget alone must be enough to choke a horse.
randge posted on 2016-03-29 09:27:31 Reply Private Reply
#15: misterwhite To: Roscoe (#12)
But, damn, she looks good.
misterwhite posted on 2016-03-29 10:29:58 Reply Private Reply
#16: Roscoe To: misterwhite (#15)
Roscoe posted on 2016-03-29 10:50:39 Reply Private Reply
#17: misterwhite To: Roscoe (#16)
The best part? It's OPM.
misterwhite posted on 2016-03-29 10:57:03 Reply Private Reply
#18: Roscoe To: misterwhite (#17)
Roscoe posted on 2016-03-29 11:21:54 Reply Private Reply
#19: misterwhite To: Roscoe (#18)
misterwhite posted on 2016-03-29 11:32:39 Reply Private Reply
#20: nolu chan To: A K A Stone (#9)
- - -
- - -
nolu chan posted on 2016-03-29 15:10:02 Reply Private Reply
#21: A K A Stone To: TooConservative (#11)
There are no facts geezer.
People pay peoples campaigns off after they leave the race. Not while they are still in it.
You establishment types are a pathetic lot.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-03-29 15:13:34 Reply Private Reply
#22: nolu chan To: A K A Stone (#21)
http://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/94925569-we-asked-30-000-voters-about-the-ted-cruz-sex-scandal
It is now 42,355 and 69% think Little Ted misbehaved.
Regardless of what the facts may be, Cruz has a perception problem.
nolu chan posted on 2016-03-29 15:34:15 Reply Private Reply
#23: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#22)
Well, that settles it. Online polls are foolproof, aren't they?
You gotta be kidding.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-03-29 22:03:28 Reply Private Reply