I don’t think even Trump thought he would get this far. And I don’t even know that he wanted to, which is perhaps the scariest prospect of all. He certainly was never prepared or equipped to go all the way to the White House, but his ego has now taken over the driver’s seat, and nothing else matters. The Donald does not fail. The Donald does not have any weakness. The Donald is his own biggest enemy . . . Trump acts as if he’s a fictional character. But like Hercules, Donald Trump is a work of fiction.
She writes that what convinced her to leave was his Easter tweet about the terror bombing in Pakistan .
Trump tweeted : "Another radical Islamic attack, this time in Pakistan, targeting Christian women & children. At least 67 dead, 400 injured. I alone can solve."
She concluded that What was once Trump's desire to rank second place to send a message to America and to increase his power as a businessman has nightmarishly morphed into a charade that is poised to do irreparable damage to this country if we do not stop this campaign in its tracks.
The Trump camp fired back at Stephanie Cegielski saying she was not a part of the campaign ,but was instead employed by the major SuperPac that supports Trump.(which she also said in her post )
#1: ConservingFreedom To: tomder55 (#0)
That explains the nonchalance about delegate nuts and bolts.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-03-28 19:50:31 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hondo68 To: tomder55 (#0)
To know him, is to hate him.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-03-28 19:58:41 Reply Private Reply
#3: Tooconservative To: tomder55 (#0)
Not unheard of.
In '92, Xlinton ran to try to build his brand name for a serious run in '96. With Bush Senior's poll numbers as a victorious war president, the Dems thought he'd be unbeatable. Until suddenly, he wasn't.
Similarly, in 2008, supposedly 0bama ran to build his name and national profile but supposedly for a run as mayor of Chicago or as governor of Illinois, both jobs much more powerful than a U.S. senator from Illinois is.
So unexpected success with voters isn't all that unusual.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-03-28 20:03:08 Reply Private Reply
#4: Vicomte13 To: tomder55 (#0)
What "qualifies" him? That the majority of Electors, representing the majority of representatives of states, votes for him. That is what qualifies a man to be President.
Trump isn't cautious with his words? So what.
We've got a government full of people who are cautious with their words - and the United States has been destroyed by them during my lifetime.
Trump is RIGHT that he alone can solve the MIddle Eastern problem, because he is the only American politician ready and willing to commit the mass murder that is warfare until the enemy surrenders - and stops fighting - or are all dead.
Would ANY other candidate or politician today be willing to firebomb Tokyo or Hamburg or Dresden, or to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki to either make fanatic enemies surrender or simply massacre them for the sake of attriting their population until they were all dead. Surrender or die - all of you - that was American firebombing strategy at the end of the World War II. And it worked.
Trump is the only one unmoored from cowardice, who actually WILL commit mass murder to either break the will of the enemy or exterminate them all - men, women, children. That is war, and Trump will do what it takes.
Trump is the only one who has said that he will torture Muslim terrorists - and he will. But the law... He doesn't care: it's a goddamned war, and we're going to WIN.
I appreciate Trump.
This bitch doesn't. She's afraid. So therefore she supports Hillary Clinton, and that's who she will get too, because there is no Republican but Trump. Trump can win. But Cruz can't. None of the Republicans can win if they steal the nomination from him.
Looks like they're determined to do it. Which means Hillary. Which means that end of the Second Amendment, among other things.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-03-28 20:16:04 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: Vicomte13 (#4)
Well, you do make the case for Trump as a mass murderer quite well.
The fact that you don't grasp how repulsive this is kinda indicates we can't have much real conversation about it.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-03-28 20:21:28 Reply Private Reply
#6: Tooconservative To: tomder55 (#0)
We really haven't heard enough about Trump's super-PAC, much as he likes to denigrate and scold others for having PACs and donors (both of which Trump also has).
Tooconservative posted on 2016-03-28 20:39:55 Reply Private Reply
#7: paraclete To: tomder55 (#0)
paraclete posted on 2016-03-29 00:09:59 Reply Private Reply
#8: Vicomte13 To: TooConservative (#5)
Which, in turn, is why we will have President Hillary Clinton (or, if she's indicted, President Bernie Sanders) and a Democrat Supreme Court.
You're not budging, and neither am I. Our house is burning down, and we hate each other more than we hate the Democrats. So they win.
I'm alright with that. You're not.
So we both lose, but you lose more. And that's good enough for me.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-03-29 08:33:16 Reply Private Reply
#9: misterwhite To: tomder55 (#0)
She wasn't a "top strategist" and she didn't dump Trump. Just the opposite.
She worked for Make America Great Again Super PAC as the communications director. Basically a press secretary. When that independent PAC got too close to the Trump campaign, Trump let it be known he wanted it shut down. It did.
So now I guess she's all pissed off.
misterwhite posted on 2016-03-29 12:13:10 Reply Private Reply