UTAH CAUCUS: First hand insider report - Incompetence, Manipulation, and Ballot Stuffing!!! (handed 50+ ballots to fill out)

Source: Godlike Productions Forum
Published: Mar 23, 2016
Author: PirateMonkey
Post Date: 2016-03-23 16:23:18 by Hondo68
Views: 2185

Just got back from my caucus... My head is still spinning.

Check in was slow but reasonably controlled. Super-long lines. I've never seen turnout like this.

Got my credentials, but no presidential ballot. They said those would be delivered to our caucus room.

Got to my caucus room. I counted about 120 people there (no idea how many were actually registered and credentialed).

We elected Precinct Officers, State Delegates, and County Delegates - the typical incompetence and ignorance of the rules you'd expect to see from volunteers, but all went somewhat smooth.

...Then came the Presidential Ballot.

Someone shows up with a stack of probably 250 ballots. The precinct chair splits them up, and starts handing stacks of them out and tells people "take one and pass it down".

No checking credentials, IDs, NOTHING.

I'm sitting at the end of a row and people start handing me stacks of extras. I literally had over 50 ballots in my hand.

[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

We were told to mark our vote and place our ballot in a tin can. They then asked for a volunteer to hold the can. At this point, most people filed out the door.

I cast ONE vote, then stuck around to see what would happen with the votes.

About 15 minutes later, with only about 10 or so people milling around, someone walks in the room with an envelopes STUFFED full of "absentee" ballots - some envelopes having 2-5+ ballots.

I raised a question and said, "isn't there an absentee process already in place? Didn't people have to register for that last week?" and was told "Oh no, this is completely normal".

As I've mentioned in other threads, I was in Party leadership for 6 years and no, this is absolutely not normal.

I then asked if I could observe the vote count, and I was told my observations where not needed and to leave the area while the ballots were being counted.

I left the room (things were already a complete Charlie Foxtrot at this point) and wandered over to my friends precinct caucus to see if it was just as much a cluster.

His caucus was just getting to the presidential ballot, and as I walked in the door I was handed ANOTHER BALLOT.

Again, no credential check, no ID check, NOTHING.

No, I didn't vote again...

I went back to my precinct and they had the results:
74% Cruz
14% Trump
11% Kasich

Now just imagine this kind of outright incompetence/manipulation happening in 2000 precincts across the state.

As I left the building, I started overhearing results coming back from other precincts... Overwhelmingly numbers for Cruz... Like 70-90% or more. (In one precinct Cruz got around 100, Trump had 2, Kasich 0)

Bottom line... They basically are going to post whatever the hell numbers they want.

There were no apparent controls, no credential checks, no ID checks, and ballots being handed around like napkins.

UTAH RESULTS ARE A COMPLETE SHAM

And it just cost Trump 40 delegates.

Last Edited by PirateMonkey on 03/23/2016 12:57 AM


Poster Comment:

Here, fill these out and turn them in to Bishop Mitt.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Fred Mertz    To: hondo68 (#0)

Their ballot was similar to mine in Kentucky, except we had 12 choices one of which was uncommitted. We had ovals to fill in; X wouldn't cut it.

PirateMonkey

He seems like a reliable source, although Fred Mertz has better overall credibility.

Fred Mertz posted on 2016-03-23 16:29:16   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Hondo68    To: Fred Mertz, the gold standard (#1)

Note the high security ballot paper with the GOP watermark!

No expense was spared to rig this primary.

Hondo68 posted on 2016-03-23 16:32:27   Reply   Private Reply


#3: Fred Mertz    To: hondo68 (#2)

I noticed the same in my county. We signed in and were given this little ballot with 12 choices. I guess if I was a cousin to somebody they could have handed me 10 or 20 without anyone noticing. Not serial number controlled.

I filled in the oval and put it in the metal (used to be galvanized) box. I'll bet that box has a history in itself.

Fred Mertz posted on 2016-03-23 16:44:08   Reply   Private Reply


#4: BobCeleste    To: hondo68 (#0)

Cheating is the only way cruz can win.

BobCeleste posted on 2016-03-23 21:26:25   Reply   Private Reply


#5: BobCeleste    To: Fred Mertz (#3)

I noticed the same in my county. We signed in and were given this little ballot with 12 choices. I guess if I was a cousin to somebody they could have handed me 10 or 20 without anyone noticing. Not serial number controlled.

In Maine there was no chance Donald could win. Look at the type of Republican Maine elects, susan collins, olympia snowe, bruce poliquin, Squish Republicans at best bottom line corrupt RINOs for the most part and still Cruz felt it necessary to lie.

www.mainetv.net/cruz_is_a_liar.htm

BobCeleste posted on 2016-03-23 21:31:40   Reply   Private Reply


#6: Tooconservative    To: hondo68 (#0)

Author: PirateMonkey

An anonymous user on a crackpot forum.

I'm surprised he hasn't been on Faux News yet.

Tooconservative posted on 2016-03-24 01:23:04   Reply   Private Reply


#7: rlk    To: hondo68 (#0)

There were no apparent controls, no credential checks, no ID checks, and ballots being handed around like napkins.

That's not incompetence. That's knowing fabrication of a mythical population of voters to falsify an election.

rlk posted on 2016-03-24 02:36:20   Reply   Private Reply