United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Palin on Obama’s oil spill performance: Lack of executive experience showing — in spades!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://politipage.com/2010/06/08/pa ... -experience-showing-in-spades/
Published: Jun 9, 2010
Author: Sarah Palin
Post Date: 2010-06-09 09:46:10 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 868
Comments: 52
50 days in, and we’ve just learned another shocking revelation concerning the Obama administration’s response to the Gulf oil spill. In an interview aired this morning, President Obama admitted that he hasn’t met with or spoken directly to BP’s CEO Tony Hayward. His reasoning: “Because my experience is, when you talk to a guy like a BP CEO, he’s gonna say all the right things to me. I’m not interested in words. I’m interested in actions.” First, to the “informed and enlightened” mainstream media: in all the discussions you’ve had with the White House about the spill, did it not occur to you before today to ask how the CEO-to-CEO level discussions were progressing to remedy this tragedy? You never cease to amaze. (Kind of reminds us of the months on end when you never bothered to ask if the President was meeting with General McChrystal to talk about our strategy in Afghanistan.) Second, to fellow baffled Americans: this revelation is further proof that it bodes well to have some sort of executive experience before occupying the Oval Office (as if the painfully slow response to the oil spill, confusion of duties, finger-pointing, lack of preparedness, and inability to grant local government simple requests weren’t proof enough). The current administration may be unaware that it’s the President’s duty, meeting on a CEO-to-CEO level with Hayward, to verify what BP reports. In an interview a few weeks ago with Greta Van Susteren, I noted that based on my experience working with oil execs as an oil regulator and then as a Governor, you must verify what the oil companies claim – because their perception of circumstances and situations dealing with public resources and public trust is not necessarily shared by those who own America’s public resources and trust. I was about run out of town in Alaska for what critics decried at the time as my “playing hardball with Big Oil,” and those same adversaries (both shortsighted Repubs and Dems) continue to this day to try to discredit my administration’s efforts in holding Big Oil accountable to operate ethically and responsibly. Mr. President: with all due respect, you have to get involved, sir. The priorities and timeline of an oil company are not the same as the public’s. You cannot outsource the cleanup and the responsibility and the trust to BP and expect that the legitimate interests of Americans adversely affected by this spill will somehow be met. White House: have you read this morning’s Washington Post? Not to pile it on BP, but there’s an extensive report chronicling the company’s troubling history: “BP has had more high-profile accidents than any other company in recent years. And now, with the disaster in the gulf, independent experts say the pervasiveness of the company’s problems, in multiple locales and different types of facilities, is striking. ‘They are a recurring environmental criminal and they do not follow U.S. health safety and environmental policy,’ said Jeanne Pascal, a former EPA lawyer who led its BP investigations.” And yet just 10 days prior to the explosion, the Obama administration’s regulators gave the oil rig a pass, and last year the Obama administration granted BP a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) exemption for its drilling operation. These decisions and the resulting spill have shaken the public’s confidence in the ability to safely drill. Unless government appropriately regulates oil developments and holds oil executives accountable, the public will not trust them to drill, baby, drill. And we must! Or we will be even more beholden to, and controlled by, dangerous foreign regimes that supply much of our energy. This has been a constant refrain from me. As Governor of Alaska, I did everything in my power to hold oil companies accountable in order to prove to the federal government and to the nation that Alaska could be trusted to further develop energy rich land like ANWR and NPR-A. I hired conscientious Democrats and Republicans (because this sure shouldn’t be a partisan issue) to provide me with the best advice on how we could deal with what was a corrupt system of some lawmakers and administrators who were hesitant to play hardball with some in the oil field business. (Remember the Alaska lawmakers, public decision-makers, and business executives who ended up going to jail as a result of the FBI’s investigations of oily corruption.) As the aforementioned article notes, BP’s operation in Alaska would hurt our state and waste public resources if allowed to continue. That’s why my administration created the Petroleum Systems Integrity Office (PSIO) when we saw proof of improper maintenance of oil infrastructure in our state. We had to verify. And that’s why we instituted new oversight and held BP and other oil companies financially accountable for poor maintenance practices. We knew we could partner with them to develop resources without pussyfooting around with them. As a CEO, it was my job to look out for the interests of Alaskans with the same intensity and action as the oil company CEOs looked out for the interests of their shareholders. I learned firsthand the way these companies operate when I served as chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). I ended up resigning in protest because my bosses (the Governor and his chief of staff at the time) wouldn’t support efforts to clean up the corruption involving improper conflicts of interest with energy companies that the state was supposed to be watching. (I wrote about this valuable learning experience in my book, “Going Rogue”.) I felt guilty taking home a big paycheck while being reduced to sitting on my thumbs – essentially rendered ineffective as a supervisor of a regulatory agency in charge of nearly 20% of the U.S. domestic supply of energy. My experience (though, granted, I got the message loud and clear during the campaign that my executive experience managing the fastest growing community in the state, and then running the largest state in the union, was nothing compared to the experiences of a community organizer) showed me how government officials and oil execs could scratch each others’ backs to the detriment of the public, and it made me ill. I ran for Governor to fight such practices. So, as a former chief executive, I humbly offer this advice to the President: you must verify. That means you must meet with Hayward. Demand answers. In the interview today, the President said: “I don’t sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar. We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose ass to kick.” Please, sir, for the sake of the Gulf residents, reach out to experts who have experience holding oil companies accountable. I suggested a few weeks ago that you start with Alaska’s Department of Natural Resources, led by Commissioner Tom Irwin. Having worked with Tom and his DNR and AGIA team led by Marty Rutherford, I can vouch for their integrity and expertise in dealing with Big Oil and overseeing its developments. We’ve all lived and worked through the Exxon-Valdez spill. They can help you. Give them a call. Or, what the heck, give me a call. And, finally, Mr. President, please do not punish the American public with any new energy tax in response to this tragedy. Just because BP and federal regulators screwed up that doesn’t mean the rest of us should get punished with higher taxes at the pump and attached to everything petroleum products touch.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#1. To: no gnu taxes (#0)
Chuckles...Palin wants Obama to check the veracity of what BP reports by checking with...wait for it...BP?!? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... What a brilliant mind she!!! /sarcasm
Doesn't she know the Kenyan is busy?
What do you want Obama to do, Boy? Take one of Palin's tampons and sop up the spill himself? This article is one big fluff piece. "Call them...heck call me"?!? Why? Because they know how to oversee the oil industry? How is that going to solve this problem? Getting this leak stopped and cleaned up isn't a bureaucratic problem...it's an engineering problem. Please, this is the same woman who advocated easing all restrictions on domestic and off shore drilling. She has no vast regulatory experience or meaningful executive experience in disaster management. Every time she opens her yap, she reveals herself as a fool.
Obama knew about this from day one and did nothing to mobilize Federal resources to protect the coastlines. Katrina = President wanting to help, Governor preventing it. Oil spill = Governor wanting help, President refusing to give it.
Jindal is revealing himself to be too big a pussy to ever be president of the US. But it's great to know what nanny staters you so called conservatives are.
The Federal government has the responsibility and the resources to protect the coastlines. This is an emergency.
Like it has been said, the arm of government that deals with these spills, the Corp of engineers has been there from the start. If BP hadn't lied about the potential extent of the spill to begin with maybe there would have been a little more urgency put into the situation.
And they aren't doing anything. If BP hadn't lied about the potential extent of the spill Obama was briefed about the extent of the spill from day one. What has not been previously disclosed: The president was not only briefed on the real-time events of the spill, but also on just how bad it would be—and how hard it would be to plug the hole. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-06-04/obama-briefed-in-april-by-carol-browner-on-how-bad-bp-spill-was-/
So.....? Just what interventions would you have the government do? Put their own caps on the well? Tell us in detail what would you do?
Jindal requested five million feet of hard boom back on May 2, long after Obama knew about the magnitude of the disaster. By May 24, not even 800,000 feet had arrived. What happened?
The rest is on backorder? You tell us as you seem to have all the inside answers.
The fact is Jindal made the request of BP...a Maine manufacturer saw the spill and started manufacturing boom on the knowledge that there was not enough available [Jindal knew that as well]...the manufacturer offered BP the boom it had made and BP did...BUPKIS...
#35. To: war (#29)
They are an approved BP vendor. You gonna tell me that the President can't purchase the boom through executive channels and get it down there and bill BP?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe current administration may be unaware that it’s the President’s duty, meeting on a CEO-to-CEO level with Hayward, to verify what BP reports.
#2. To: war (#1)
#6. To: no gnu taxes (#2)
#7. To: war (#6)
#8. To: no gnu taxes (#7)
Oil spill = Governor wanting help, President refusing to give it.
#11. To: mininggold (#8)
#15. To: no gnu taxes (#11)
#19. To: mininggold (#15)
the Corp of engineers has been there from the start.
#21. To: no gnu taxes (#19)
the Corp of engineers has been there from the start. And they aren't doing anything.
#26. To: mininggold (#21)
#28. To: no gnu taxes (#26)
Jindal requested five million feet of hard boom back on May 2, long after Obama knew about the magnitude of the disaster. By May 24, not even 800,000 feet had arrived. What happened?
#29. To: mininggold (#28)
Replies to Comment # 29.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]