U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Jim Gilchrist & Jerome Corsi accuse President Bush of Dereliction of Duty and he must be stopped he is a threat to the United States of America
Source:
coast to coast radio tonight
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 6, 2006
Author: Jim GilChrist & Jerome Corsi
Post Date: 2006-06-06 02:11:22 by TLBSHOW
Keywords: None
Views: 1941
Comments: 9
bush must be stopped! he is trying to destroy this country! coast to coast radio tonight - Jim GilChrist President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration’s true open borders policy. Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada. Jerome Corsi
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
The Constitution says a President can be impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors," but it doesn't define the term. Who decides what that means? Columbus, Ohio - 5/3/00 The Congress decides the definition: by majority vote in the House for impeachment, and by 2/3 vote in the Senate for conviction. The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment. Then Representative Gerald Ford put it into practical perspective in 1970, when he said an impeachable offense is "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." "High crimes and misdemeanors" entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment -- treason and bribery -- were not enough. He worried that other "great and dangerous offenses" might not be covered, and suggested adding the word "maladministration." Madison argued that term was too vague, so Mason then proposed "high crimes and misdemeanors," a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a "misdemeanor" meant "mis-demeanor,"or bad behavior (neglect of duty and corruption were given as examples), while "high crimes" was roughly equivalent to "great offenses." Lawyers and historians are still arguing about the exact meaning of "high crimes and misdemeanors," dividing into three schools of thought about the appropriate definition: (1) serious criminality evidenced by breaking existing law; (2) an abuse of office, and (3) the Alexander Hamilton standard (Federalist 65) of "violation of public trust." In our most recent experience with presidential impeachment -- Watergate in 1974 -- the House Judiciary Committee strongly argued that the case for impeachment need not be limited to actual violations of criminal law. In its report, Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment, the Committee argued the definition should go beyond actual breach of law, citing Blackstone's phrase, "an injury to the state or system of government," Justice Joseph Story's phrase, "offenses of a political character," and Edmund Burke's statement at an impeachment trial that the official on trial should be judged "not upon the niceties of a narrow jurisprudence, but upon the enlarged and solid principles of morality." The Committee further stated that historically, Congress had issued Articles of Impeachment in three broad categories: (1) exceeding the constitutional bounds of the powers of the office; (2) behaving in a manner grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office; and (3) employing the power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.
freeper that travis mcgee slammed around as a traitor tony JACKASS Snow wary of 'splashy' stories on these pages Didn't appreciate article 'about what I did or did not believe' By Les Kinsolving White House press secretary Tony Snow Presidential press secretary Tony Snow ended his press briefing today by refusing to answer a WND question about immigration reform, saying a previous answer to the newssite had been turned into "this big splashy thing on WorldNetDaily." After asking two questions earlier in the briefing, WND got Snow's attention for the final question of the day. "In Michigan, the Lansing State Journal said that U.S. Senators Stabenow and Levin 'voted in favor of illegality, in favor of border insecurity,'" stated WND. "And my question, does the president believe that the Lansing –" Interjected Snow: "Lester, last time you asked a question like this, there was this big splashy thing on WorldNetDaily about what I did or did not believe. I'm not going to bite on an editorial in the Lansing state paper." Snow apparently was referring to a story on Friday in which WND reported that the spokesman rejected the characterization of the constant flow of illegal aliens over the U.S. border as an "invasion." At Friday's White House press briefing, WorldNetDaily asked the spokesman: "Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution says, 'The United States shall guarantee to every state in the Union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them from foreign invasion.' My question is, does the president believe this foreign invasion means only armed invasion, or doesn't this also mean the invasion of millions of illegal immigrants?" Responded Snow: "I think what you are doing is you're attaching a martial connotation to something that does not have martial consequences. … "What the president has said – if you were talking about an invasion, he's made it clear that Mexico is not the enemy."
The papacy has made colossal fools of untold millions of people down through history, and it is still doing so today.
BUMP TO THE DOWNFALL OF TRAITOR BUSH
“It is my duty as a commissioned officer of the United States Army to speak out against grave injustices. My moral and legal obligation is to the Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders. I stand before you today because it is my job to serve and protect those soldiers, the American people, and innocent Iraqis with no voice. “It is my conclusion as an officer of the Armed Forces that the war in Iraq is not only morally wrong but a horrible breach of American law. Although I have tried to resign out of protest, I am forced to participate in a war that is manifestly illegal. As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately unlawful as well, I must as an offficer of honor and integrity refuse that order. “The war in Iraq violates our democratic system of checks and balances. It usurps international treaties and conventions that by virtue of the Constitution become American law. The wholesale slaughter and mistreatment of the Iraqi people with only limited accountability is not only a terrible moral injustice, but a contradiction of the Army’s own Law of Land Warfare. My participation would make me party to war crimes. “Normally, those in the military have allowed others to speak for them and act on their behalf. That time has come to an end. I have appealed to my commanders to see the larger issues of our actions. But justice has not been forthcoming. My oath of office is to protect and defend America’s laws and its people. By refusing unlawful orders for an illegal war, I fulfill that oath today.”
PING
bump
bump
http://www.c-span.org/questions/week119.htm
#2. To: All (#1)
#3. To: TLBSHOW (#1)
Peter-Hans Kolvenbach (1928--)
Jesuit General since 1983. Shrubya's Master
#4. To: Coral Snake (#3)
(1) serious criminality evidenced by breaking existing law; (2) an abuse of office, and (3) the Alexander Hamilton standard (Federalist 65) of "violation of public trust."
#5. To: All (#0)
#6. To: All (#5)
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/military/story/5795894p-5178126c.html
#7. To: itisa1mosttoolate (#1)
#8. To: All (#0)
#9. To: All (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]