If you think Obama is the right choice for this nation, then you are among those who believe we should no longer be a Capitalist nation, but a socialist country led by dictators.
Milton Friedman and Pinochet proved that Capitalism (a word coined by Marx) is not synonymous with freedom for human beings, but can happily coexist with a dictator. Capitalism is an economic system, not a political system.
The numbers don't lie. From double digit unemployment, six figure per month foreclosures, tripling of the deficit (4 times over April of last year, btw) to our relationships with our allies.
The kool aid drinkers won't admit it.
Why are they are cowards about admitting they feel 0bama is doing a *snicker* a "great job"? Why won't they admit here that they believe he's doing right by America?
Because like all liberals and Commie-leaning hypocrites, they HIDE. OBFUSCATE. LIE.
Look no further than you who pulled the handle for that wholly incomptetent boob and his resume of failure for why we are where we are now.
Bill Oreilly will be proud of you. No president makes a country great it is the citizens that do that, stupid. So when does the that revolution I keep hearing is imminent from your aging bureacrat police friends, start?
An adminstration [Dubya's] which...was absolutely derelict in its management of domestic fiscal and regulatory affairs as well.
You mean 0bama and Geitner haven't been dictatorial, derelict, criminally negligent, and corrupt in their management of domestic and regulatory affairs?
Despite 0bama's $800 billion Stimulus bill, why is the economy still a trainwreck and getting worse? Why the rampant job loss and fudged 12% unemployment figures? Why the rampant foreclosures and business closings? Why the over-regulation of everything from Twinkies to suing states for enforcing federal law?
That must be some great blow you've been tootin' for the past year and a half.
Bill Oreilly will be proud of you. No president makes a country great it is the citizens that do that, stupid. So when does the that revolution I keep hearing is imminent from your aging bureacrat police friends, start?
WTF are you blathering on about you blithering, bungling bobblehead of bullsh*t?
Try paying attention to whom your posting to...Putting down the bottle of "breakfast" might help.
I don't think any 'bureacrat police friends' will start this revolution, but they will be among those who end it!
The 'Revolution' has begun, just not in your area yet!
I admit it's difficult to discern whether Mininggold is playing dumb.
She and her ilk of Hopey-Changey statist projectionists either can't wait for COMMIE USA, or are truly and hopelessly delusional and disengaged from reality.
We're not in Canada, I didn't ask you about Canada...answer the question, or STFU!
Do you favore a Socialist system over a Capitalist system HERE IN AMERICA?
If you mean by Socialist a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state the answer is NO.
If your definition is a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done, I'd say that's a fact, Jack, in the good old US of A.
The point is that even thought Bush was bad. Obama is about 32 times as bad.
Well, that's the way it works now, isn't it?
Bush I was worse than Reagan, Clinton was worse than Bush I, Bush II was worse than Clinton, etc.
Badeye discovered a balm, Which helped him achieve inner calm, He took things in hand, And hummed on his gland, But now he has hair on his palm. "I gave myself a Hummer. (chuckle)"
However, if we're talking about financial matters, Clinton doesn't belong in this list.
Badeye discovered a balm, Which helped him achieve inner calm, He took things in hand, And hummed on his gland, But now he has hair on his palm. "I gave myself a Hummer. (chuckle)"
My friend lost her life savings under Reagan's deregulation of the S and Ls and McCain's meddling....so I'm sure SHE would disagree.
Telling....
Regulation equals less freedom.
So how is someone being more free to do what they want to blame for someone losing their life savings. Do tell how someone could lose their life savings because someone else was more free.
Sorry your friend lost their money I just don't understand how you can blame that on Reagan.
Can we blame Owebama and to a 1/32 degree blame Bush and his predecessors for destroying my kids future with unsustainable debt?
Stupid bitch is still too ditzty to understand that we live in a country where a man, or woman, can earn as much money as they want, no limit, no cap on how much a person earns, as long as they work and earn it.