LOL...she was talking about those 9 people who were indicted in federal court on charges they accessed Obama's student loan records while employed for a Department of Education contractor in Iowa.
And I think that if something drastic doesn't happen soon, she may be right, this nation is just getting worse, not better.
I'm 52 in 19 days. I've heard that my entire life. The only time I have agreed with that statement was from 2002 until late 2006 when you morons who voted for Boy Blunder finally woke the fuck up. I just hope Obama CAN turn it around so much fucking damage was done.
It's real simple how it works...vote for the smarter one...it works 99% of the time.
I'm 52 in 19 days. I've heard that my entire life. The only time I have agreed with that statement was from 2002 until late 2006 when you morons who voted for Boy Blunder finally woke the fuck up. I just hope Obama CAN turn it around so much fucking damage was done.
First war, I am also in my 50's, and I've seen alot in my time, and it's getting worse, whether I am a part of it or not, it's there. I am among the lucky ones who live a quiet life away from most of what's going on around me, and I can choose to ignore it and pretend it isn't happening, or I can wake up to reality.
If you think Obama is the right choice for this nation, then you are among those who believe we should no longer be a Capitalist nation, but a socialist country led by dictators.
He has weakened this nation, weakened our military, weakened our leadership by bowing down to our enemies all over the world.
No one has done more to divide the races quite like him, you may not see much from where your sitting, but civil war, race baiters have become braver, Mexicans march and have declared war on this nation, a UCLA teacher is advocating war against whites and our country, a revolution is brewing....
I don't mean to rant, but there isn't enough room here to list everything that's gone wrong since he's been in office, you have access to the internet, you are one of the lucky ones, and yet you're still blind.
If you think Obama is the right choice for this nation, then you are among those who believe we should no longer be a Capitalist nation, but a socialist country led by dictators.
Milton Friedman and Pinochet proved that Capitalism (a word coined by Marx) is not synonymous with freedom for human beings, but can happily coexist with a dictator. Capitalism is an economic system, not a political system.
Its kind of ironic that Hong Kong and Singapore top the Heritage Foundation's list as the two freest economies in the world. Singapore has had one party rule since its inception and Hong Kong belongs to China.
Australia, number three on the list, has had universal health care since 1984. Canada ranks number seven; the United States, eight; and Denmark, nine.
He has weakened this nation, weakened our military, weakened our leadership by bowing down to our enemies all over the world.
Bush handed over a weakened nation to Obama.
Dwight Eisenhower said "Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it." With few exceptions, the world was on our side after 9/11; Bush took that good will, that "wants to do it" and threw it in the toilet believing that the world would accept the leadership of a strong bully. A bully can compel compliance, but not loyalty, and good will. It is the leadership style of the dictator.
Milton Friedman and Pinochet proved that Capitalism (a word coined by Marx) is not synonymous with freedom for human beings, but can happily coexist with a dictator. Capitalism is an economic system, not a political system.
Do you think we should do away with our capitalist system in favor of a socialist system?
Do you agree with the first wookie, we should 'share the pie'?
We're not in Canada, I didn't ask you about Canada...answer the question, or STFU!
Do you favore a Socialist system over a Capitalist system HERE IN AMERICA?
If you mean by Socialist a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state the answer is NO.
If your definition is a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done, I'd say that's a fact, Jack, in the good old US of A.
