[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: A witchhunt by men who molest the law [Update: She's been acquitted.] Raise your hand if youve never heard of Tonya Craft. I hadnt either, until I stumbled across this post at change.org. Tonya Craft is the latest lightning rod in that modern day witch-hunt: the sex offender. But, from all accounts, this isnt a normal case. This is a shining example of the lengths people will go to, in order to brand someone a villain. The word sham is inadequate to describe the sheer rape of the law that is currently underway in Northwest Georgia at Crafts trial. Theres little doubt that a guilty verdict will fail on appeal. Yet Arnt and his fellow prosecutor Len Gregor seem intent on achieving one anyway, no matter the cost. Theyve badgered witnesses with questions about Crafts exercise and lawn-mowing habits, of all things. Theyve asked whether Craft is a narcissist, and if Craft ever passed out in a girlfriends bed after a night of drinking. These so-called sordid revelations that the kind that only a puritan (or an unhinged prosecutor) would connect to evidence of child molestation. The case has gotten weirder and weirder. One defense witness, who let Craft watch her children every day for almost two years without incident, testified that one of Crafts accusers who is also a child actress was worldly for her age. Does that mean shes a slut? asked Gregor. When the witness uncomfortably denied the charge, Gregor wondered whether the child might be a pre-slut. While change.org has two posts on the subject, much of the coverage is being done by this man (and this newspaper). The transgressions of the prosecutors in this case are numerous: from claiming that they didnt have to obey the law, to employing the worst experts, to seeking to introduce dubious prior bad acts. I could really go on, but that wouldnt do the story any justice. Instead, follow the yellow brick road from the ridiculous: Crafts trial has also seen a parade of so-called forensics experts act as effective cheerleaders for the prosecution. One expert who made an appearance, Holly Nave Kittle of the Childrens Advocacy Center, was openly hostile to questions about her lack of credentials and was unfamiliar with any relevant child abuse literature. Neither did she help her credibility as a witness after she liked a public Facebook post by Arnt, in which he wondered if Tonya Crafts Defense [sic] lawyers are really insane of [sic] just trying to jack up her defense bill? (Both Arnt and Kittles conduct likely violate Georgias ethical rules.) Another prosecution expert involved, Suzie Thorne, lacks a college degree, and her testimony seems highly suspect. When Thorne interviewed one of the children involved during a videotaped session, she asked the girl a whopping 16 times whether anything else happened. Each time, the child said no. However, Thorne testified that after she shut off the camera, the child left the room and then returned suddenly remembering that yes, Craft had sexually abused her. Fair enough. But then why didnt Thorne record this statement, or press the child for more information on camera? to the what the fuck are you talking about?: Do you know anything about a time that Ms. Craft came to the door of her home dressed only in a towel to meet a first-time date? No, I do not, said the witness. Mr. Gregor asked, Do you know any narcissists? No, I do not. Would a good person molest a child? No. Would a good person insert a finger or thumb in a vagina or rectum? No. As Noah Arenstein at Change puts it: the prosecutors were becoming increasingly unhinged. At least until the media showed up. But thats not the worst of it. The man who seems to have defiled the purity and sanctity of the law the most is the judge presiding over the trial: Judge Brian House. Starting with declining (without explanation) to recuse himself from the trial, despite having represented Crafts ex-husband in his divorce from her, to permitting completely irrelevant testimony about the defendants alleged affairs with adults, to not permitting the defense to present any character evidence of the defendant, after permitting irrelevant character-assassination testimony from the prosecution. We all are aware that allegations of child sexual abuse inflame the passions of most people. But when a woman is so horribly being railroaded in a trial, where the singular aim seems to be to obtain a conviction in the face of damning evidence suggesting the contrary, where all independent observes agree that even if a conviction is obtained, it is sure to be reversed on appeal, do we know that weve crossed the line from hysteria into madness. Prosecutors so abusing their power and a judge sanctioning the farce is a damning indictment of the lengths we will go to to demonize those that may be innocent so long as a child is involved. Whether Tonya Craft is guilty or not is irrelevant. That the trial is being permitted to be conducted in such an egregious manner casts a dark pall over all of us that hold the criminal justice system here in such high regard. While this is the first Ive read about Tonya Craft, this wont be the last. I hope its the same for you.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: no gnu taxes (#0)
(Edited)
You seem to dwell in the realm of perv. Do you believe that touching a 13 year old girl is right or wrong?
#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace
I believe railroading someone falsely accused of it is wrong.
The article is short on details and, as usual, your link is blocked by destro's software...
#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|