[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Bush Tax Cuts Vs Obama Stimulus Package - The 12 Following Months of Each
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://bandas.com.gt/josiespataro/2 ... e-12-following-months-of-each/
Published: Apr 30, 2010
Author: bandas.com
Post Date: 2010-04-30 08:26:35 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 11218
Comments: 10

In 2003, President Bush signed into law a large tax cut for all “net taxpayers.”

Net taxpayers are those whose final tax payment, exceeds any form of offset or reduction. Net taxpayers must be distinguished from those who could be classified as “net tax receivers.”

Net tax receivers, get credits and other transfers from “net taxpayers” turned over to them, in the form of cash–thousands of dollars of cash, to millions of recipients.

The 2003 tax cuts went 100% to “net taxpayers.” The Obama portion of his-misnamed-tax cuts, went/go almost 100% to “net tax recipients.”

Millions of individuals, classified as taxpayers, file a tax return, have taxes temporarily withheld, before those payments are refunded. Beyond that, recipients receive huge amounts of cash paid by “net taxpayers.”

This is a welfare payment done through the tax code. The amounts received are based on means-testing, as are all welfare programs. They are also classified as transfer payments.

2003 Bush Tax Cuts Vs. 2009 Obama Stimulus Package–12 Following Months of Each

2003 Bush Tax Cuts—Net Jobs Gained (plus) +1.1 Million

2009 Obama Stimulus—Net Jobs Lost (minus) -3.1 Million

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) U.S. Dept. of Labor

Cost To Taxpayers

2003 Bush Tax Cuts—0

2009 Obama Stimulus—$862 Billion

Source: Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

Avg. Cost To Individual “Net Income Taxpayers” Applied To Present Workforce

2003 Bush Tax Cuts–0

2009 Obama Stimulus–$9269

Source: Tax Foundation–Based on Statistics From The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 2006 Latest data available

Most recent data available lists 93 million “net income tax” payers

Receipts To Government: Two Quarters Following Each

2003 Bush Tax Cuts–(Plus) +$90.7 Billion

2009 Obama Stimulus–(Minus) -$65.8 Billion (Third Quarter Receipts Not Yet Available)

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) U.S. Dept. of Commerce

Disposable Personal Income–Third Full Quarter Following Enactment of Tax Cuts and Stimulus—Inflation Adjusted

per capita (every man, woman and child)

2003 Bush Tax Cuts——-(plus) +$658

2009 Obama Stimulus—(plus) +$290 (Fourth Quarter Data Not Yet Available)

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) U.S. Dept. of Commerce

President Obama’s constant utterance “I gave tax cuts to 95% of Americans.” is not only untrue but it is very close to being 100% untrue. Practically all payments given to recipients were “transfer payments” of other taxpayers’ money, received under the euphemism “credits.”

A tiny few, who in the end did make a “net tax payment”, reduced their taxes for one year, through such credits as the home buyers credit, but this giant $ 8000 giveaway, was also available to those who paid no taxes whatsoever, which means that in the long run it will be an added cost to all “net taxpayers”

Credits at one time were only a payment to reduce taxes actually paid. Taxpayers originally lowered their tax but could never go lower than zero.

Now in most cases, credits are simply transfers or redistribution, from those who earned the money from their own business or employer, to those who have not earned it in any way.

CREDITS: Business and Individual Credits Should Be Eliminated–Only Deductions From Taxes Actually Paid Should Be Allowed

Businesses get credits, but in most cases, only reduce the amount of the final tax, actually paid.

If credits were completely removed from all taxpayers, tax rates not only could be lowered to individuals and business, but revenues to government would dramatically increase as they have done historically. This would give our economy an enormous boost.

This actually happened to a great degree in 1986 but congress as always, undid the improvements, using the usual tactic of class warfare.

Many voters mistakenly believe that corporations actually “receive” money from government. The reality is they contribute quite substantially.

Corporations, initially, do receive tens of billions in credits. However, the final amount of “net taxes paid” is hefty. In 2006 for instance, when tax revenues to government were soaring from all revenue sources, corporations turned over a “final net amount” of $395 billion dollars. This is after credits, subsidies, allowances, etc. whatever term anyone chooses. That final amount paid, represented a full 1/8 of federal revenues for the year.

President Obama’s Stimulus package on the other hand, borrowed $787 billion of taxpayers’ money which must be repaid by taxpayers now and in ensuing years. $787 billion was the original cost estimate submitted by the Congressional Budget Office; since then, a CBO revision added $85 billion.

The most important figure above for individuals would seem to be DISPOSABLE PERSONAL INCOME (DPI). This tells how much more or less taxpayers had to spend.

As of this date, the data greatly favors the Bush tax cuts, which shows a gain of over 2 1/4 times that of the Stimulus, with not one penny of debt added on to taxpayers, from the tax cuts.

Notice too, that receipts to government increased after the Bush Tax Cuts and decreased after the Obama Stimulus.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Apples versus Oranges: The flavor difference thereafter...

#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace

war  posted on  2010-04-30   8:40:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: war (#1)

Apples versus Oranges: The flavor difference thereafter...

LOL

A rebuttal representative of the true idiot that you are.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-04-30   8:43:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: no gnu taxes (#0)

2003 Bush Tax Cuts—Net Jobs Gained (plus) +1.1 Million

2009 Obama Stimulus—Net Jobs Lost (minus) -3.1 Million

It's kind of stupid to compare a tax cut issued during an expansion with one issued during the biggest economic collapse since the great depression.

Keep in mind, the economy gained jobs after Reagan's 1986 tax hike.

Being a Republican means you get to choose your own reality.

go65  posted on  2010-04-30   8:52:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: go65 (#3)

Keep in mind, the economy gained jobs after Reagan's 1986 tax hike.

Being a Republican means you get to choose your own reality.

#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace

war  posted on  2010-04-30   9:03:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: go65 (#3) (Edited)

It's kind of stupid to compare a tax cut issued during an expansion

Expansion? We were having the biggest loss of jobs since Hoover. Didn't you read the papers back then?

Face it. Tax cuts do stimulate the economy. Handing out donations as paybacks to your political buddies and calling it a stimulus does not.

We were going into a recession when Bush took Office. He cut taxes and it was over in 6 months.

Keep in mind, the economy gained jobs after Reagan's 1986 tax hike.

It wasn't a tax hike. It cut taxes.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-04-30   12:58:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: no gnu taxes (#5)

It wasn't a tax hike. It cut taxes.

You might want to read a bit more about that one. The 1986 tax bill was the biggest tax hike in our nation's history, raising corporate taxes by $120 billion while eliminating deductions worth another $300 billion.

Of course that wasn't Reagan's only tax hike, in 1982 he raised taxes by $100 billion. In 1983 he raised gas taxes. In 1984 he raised business taxes by $50 billion over 3 years.

And with respect to Bush's tax cut:

January 8, 2007 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,242424,00.html

WASHINGTON — The economy has cranked out fewer jobs under President Bush — by millions — than it had by the same point in the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

As usual, facts are not your friend.

Being a Republican means you get to choose your own reality.

go65  posted on  2010-04-30   21:18:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: go65 (#6)

The 1986 tax bill was the biggest tax hike in our nation's history, raising corporate taxes by $120 billion while eliminating deductions worth another $300 billion.

You might want to read a bit more. Although its original purpose was to be revenue neutral, it was scored by the CBO as a net decrease in individual income taxes.

It also greatly simplified the tax code (its real purpose), and I know for a fact, it decreased my taxes.

WASHINGTON — The economy has cranked out fewer jobs under President Bush — by millions — than it had by the same point in the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

As usual, facts are not your friend.

Yawn. Compare the jobs cranked out under Obama to those under Obama to those under Bush. And before you say "Obama inherited a recession," so did Bush.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-05-01   10:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: no gnu taxes (#7)

You might want to read a bit more. Although its original purpose was to be revenue neutral, it was scored by the CBO as a net decrease in individual income taxes.

Up until Reagan signed the Tax reform Act in 1986 you could deduct credit card and car loan interest off your income tax. I went into a slightly lower rate, but my taxes pretty much stayed the same, because I had two car loans.

It's the war, stupid.

mininggold  posted on  2010-05-01   11:30:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: no gnu taxes (#7)

You might want to read a bit more. Although its original purpose was to be revenue neutral, it was scored by the CBO as a net decrease in individual income taxes.

Yes, individual income taxes did go down, but overall the bill raised taxes, including a $420 billion tax hike on corporations. It still is the largest tax hike in our nation's history.

Yawn. Compare the jobs cranked out under Obama to those under Obama to those under Bush. And before you say "Obama inherited a recession," so did Bush.

The recession started in March of 2001, 2 months after Bush became President, despite it being well known that Bush would pass a tax cut.

Being a Republican means you get to choose your own reality.

go65  posted on  2010-05-01   11:50:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: go65 (#9)

It still is the largest tax hike in our nation's history.

No it was not. In fact, that is total bullshit propaganda.

Corporate tax revenues pale compared to individual tax revenues.

The recession started in March of 2001, 2 months after Bush became President,

So you're claiming Bush had something to do with that?

LOL

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-05-01   12:40:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com