[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Obama to Wall Street: ‘Join Us, Instead of Fighting Us’ By PETER BAKER President Obama challenged some of the nation’s most influential bankers on Thursday to call off their “battalions of financial industry lobbyists” and embrace a new regulatory structure meant to avert another economic crisis. Speaking in the bankers’ backyard, at the Cooper Union in Manhattan, Mr. Obama castigated a “failure of responsibility” by Wall Street for having led to the financial crisis of 2008, and he pressed his case for what he called “a common-sense, reasonable, non-ideological” system of tighter regulation to prevent any recurrence. He took issue with the claim that his proposal would institutionalize the idea of future bailouts of huge banks. “That may make for a good sound bite, but it’s not factually accurate,” Mr. Obama said. “It is not true. In fact, the system as it stands is what led to a series of massive, costly taxpayer bailouts. And it’s only with reform that we can we avoid a similar outcome in the future. In other words, a vote for reform is a vote to put a stop to taxpayer-funded bailouts. That’s the truth. End of story.” He said scrupulous business leaders had no reason to resist his regulation plan. “The only people who ought to fear the kind of oversight and transparency that we’re proposing are those whose conduct will fail this scrutiny,” he said. Among those on hand were some of the city’s prominent bankers, including Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chief executive, and Gary Cohn, the chief operating officer, of Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street giant accused by the federal government last week of defrauding investors during the crisis. Also on hand were top executives from JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, Barclays and Bank of America, as well as Gov. David A. Paterson, Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who has expressed concern about the regulation plan and its impact on New York. The president’s calls to empower consumers and rein in risky trading were met with both cheers and whistles from the audience, which included students, faculty and union leaders. But his trip was also met with some skepticism and outright opposition. The New York Post ran a front-page editorial under the banner headline, “Dear Mr. President, Don’t Kill the Golden Goose: City Economy Imperiled in the Name of ‘Reform.’ ” The United States Chamber of Commerce took out full-page ads in New York papers addressing the president: “Mayor Bloomberg has pointed out that beating up on Wall Street may be good short-term politics — but not if it gets in the way of the right solutions.” Republican operatives from Washington said the president was playing politics and ignoring what they said were some of the real culprits, the government-backed mortgage housing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, accusing Democrats of blocking reforms that would have prevented problems. “How many times will President Barack Obama mention Fannie/Freddie in his speech on ‘reform’?” Brad Dayspring, a spokesman for Representative Eric I. Cantor of Virginia, the House Republican whip, said in an e-mail message to reporters. “Zero. Not once. Guess it remains the Democrats’ dirty little secret.” In traveling to New York, the president laid out the elements he insists on being in any legislation sent to him for his signature. Among them are more consumer protections, limits on the size of banks and the risks they can take, reforms on executive compensation and greater transparency for controversial securities known as derivatives. He registered his grievance with what he called the “misleading arguments and attacks” on his plan by industry lobbyists, and called on industry leaders to drop their opposition. “I am sure that some of those lobbyists work for you, and they’re doing what they’re paid to do,” he said. “But I am here today specifically when I speak to titans of industry here because I want to urge you to join us, instead of fighting us in this effort. I am here because I believe that these reforms are, in the end, not only in the best interest of our country, but in the best interest of our financial sector.” He added: “We will not always see eye to eye. We will not always agree. But that does not mean that we’ve got to choose between two extremes. We do not have to choose between markets that are unfettered by even modest protections against crisis, or markets that are stymied by onerous rules that suppress enterprise and innovation. That is a false choice.” The fight to impose tougher regulation on the financial industry has become the president’s top legislative priority in the weeks since he signed his health care program into law and both parties are jockeying for position on the issue with midterm elections just six months away. The president and his allies have eagerly portrayed Republicans as handmaidens of Wall Street while the Republicans have accused Democrats of trying to strangle the market and even institutionalize the idea of bailouts in tough times. The partisan tension appeared to ease somewhat as both sides predicted an eventual bipartisan compromise. A Senate committee on Wednesday sent to the floor a bill imposing tougher rules on derivatives, the complex securities at the heart of the 2008 financial crisis, and one Republican senator joined Democrats in advancing the legislation. In an interview with CNBC and The New York Times on Wednesday and in the speech Thursday, Mr. Obama avoided attacking Republicans directly, suggesting he was angling for a deal. But he still included tough talk about the industry that he accused of putting profit ahead of propriety. The president’s address circled back to another speech he gave at the same location in March 2008 warning of financial manipulation, market bubbles and the concentration of economic power. He repeated some of the same lines he gave two years ago and cast himself as a prescient forecaster before the collapse later that year. “I take no satisfaction in noting that my comments then have largely been borne out by the events that followed,” he said. “But I repeat what I said then because it is essential that we learn the lessons from this crisis, so we don’t doom ourselves to repeat it. And make no mistake. That is exactly what will happen if we allow this moment to pass — and that is an outcome that is unacceptable to me and it is unacceptable to you, the American people.” Mr. Obama embraced both the financial regulation bill passed by the House last year and the version emerging in the Senate. Mr. Obama laid out five elements that “must be included” in the final bill: ¶Instituting a system to shut down large financial firms that begin to fail “with the least amount of collateral damage to innocent people and businesses.” ¶Imposing the so-called Volcker Rule, named after Paul A. Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chairman who proposed limits on the freewheeling trading and risks taken by banks. ¶Setting new transparency rules for derivatives and other complex securities, to “respect legitimate activities but prevent reckless risk-taking.” ¶Assuring “strong consumer financial protections” by providing consumers with better information about financial products. ¶Allowing investors and pension holders a vote on executive pay packages and giving the Securities and Exchange Commission greater oversight over corporate elections.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#2. To: WhiteSands (#0)
You just shake your head at the idea the guy thats created the largest deficits in history in his first six months in office lecturing this particular audience about 'responsiblity' let alone ethics. The fact Owe-bama won't even address Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae being at the center of the economic meltdown is so very very telling. As is the fact his AG hasn't initiated a criminal investigation into either entity, let alone Goldman Sachs.
Chuckles...yea...you have me on filter... FNMA and FM do not lend money, Boofer. They purchase BANK issued mortgages. The financial meltdown was caused by private lending and the over leveraging of the asset securitization of that private lending. Take the top 30 sub prime lenders prior to 2006 which is considered the Ground Zero of the crisis...of those 30...only one was a bank which means only one was subject to CRA and only one could package loans to FNMA and FM.
Where did Badeye write that FNMA and FM lend money?
The financial crisis was caused by loan portfolio failure. The first conduit that failed in 2007 missed its payment because the loan portfolio backing it had a default rate approaching 20%. BTW, the fact that you challenged me on that point underscores you're just as stupid as Boofer is.
Where did B.E write that FNMA and FM lend money?
When he incorrectly claimed that they caused the financial meltdown.
Fannie Mae has no standards for portfolios?
FNMA bought/buys loans from US chartered banks only. The financial crisis was caused by non traditional read sub prime non bank lending. The fact is. FNMA's "loan" portfolio outperformed the general mortgage market all during the crisis.
FNMA bought loans made to borrowers with credit problems, and lobbied Congress for more of them.
Who asked for and got The American Dream Downpayment Act?
A 200 million dollar program. It only assisted borrowers with down payments; it was not a program to give borrowers who couldn't afford to make payments loans.
There are no replies to Comment # 18. End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|