Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Black Tea Partiers to the Leftocracy: Enough With the Slanderous Race-Baiting
Source:
Vocal Minority
URL Source: http://vocalminority.typepad.com/
Published: Mar 30, 2010
Author: Lloyd Marcus, Kevin Jackson, Ken Blackwe
Post Date: 2010-03-30 06:06:32 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 22894
Comments: 75
Black Tea Partiers to the Leftocracy: Enough With the Slanderous Race-Baiting Three patriotic black conservative Americans tell the race-obsessed Democrat party and lib mainstream media to stop slandering the Tea Party movement as racists and instead report the news accurately for a change: A Black President, the Progressive’s Perfect Trojan Horse: Lloyd Marcus … I defend my fellow patriots who are white by stating, “These patriots do not give a hoot about Obama’s skin color. They simply love their country and oppose his radical agenda. Obama’s race is not an issue”. Recently, I have come to believe that perhaps I am wrong about Obama’s race not being an issue. In reality, Obama’s presidency has everything to do with racism, but not from the Tea Party movement. Progressives and Obama have exploited his race from the rookie senator’s virtually unchallenged presidential campaign to his unprecedented bullying of America into Obamacare. Obama’s race trumped all normal media scrutiny of him as a presidential candidate and most recently even the Constitution of the United States. Obamacare forces all Americans to purchase health care,which is clearly unconstitutional. No white president could get away with boldly and arrogantly thwarting the will of the American people and ignoring laws. President Clinton tried universal health care. Bush tried social security reform. The American people said “no” to both presidents’ proposals and it was the end of it. So how can Obama get away with giving the American people the finger? The answer. He is black. The mainstream media continues to portray all who oppose Obama in any way as racist. Despite a list of failed policies, overreaches into the private sector, violations of the Constitution and planned destructive legislation too numerous to mention in this article, many Americans are still fearful of criticizing our first black president. Incredible. My fellow Americans, you must not continue to allow yourselves to be “played” and intimidated by Obama’s race or the historical context of his presidency. If we are to save America, the greatest nation on the planet, Obama’s progressive agenda must be stopped.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 45.
#2. To: Murron (#0)
Owe-bama and the MSM feel forced to go 'nuclear' this early in his so far failing Presidency. Thats revealing. Its also politically stupid. We have a long long way to go before the 2012 election cycle. 'going there' at this time means by the time we get to 2012, the average voter will be immune to claims of 'your a racist if you don't vote Owe-bama'. Math isn't 'racist' nor is it 'bigoted'. Only a liberal could suggest it is, see Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac for perfect examples of this, how it was used to keep these fucked up entities from being audited until we lost a trillion dollars plus.
LMAO! I'll bet you had to change your tighty whities after finding that one war...lol GIVE ME A BREAK! Check your line war, you've just lost your bait! Why don't you spend more time trying to prove the 'N' word was used against the Black Caucus...the reward has been upped to $100,000 if you can!
That sign encompasses exactly what Jefferson was thinking when he wrote the 2nd Amendment. Interesting to note who objects, and what that implies, isn't it?
Interesting to note who objects, and what that implies, isn't it? Now you've done it....
I actually own firearms. No worries here. (laughing) Jefferson knew what he was writing, and WHY. The fact those objecting to that particular sign don't understand this - more likely they know they can't acknowledge it because it undermines the entire 'anti gun' argument - speaks volumes. Either they are disingenuous, or intentionally ignorant of the subject matter. Hell, that one argues he's more knowlegable about the Constitutional Aspects of 2A than the current USSC based on its throwing out the DC gun ban I suspect. Whats that tell you? Locker room lawyers...I have more respect for them cause they are in the locker room. Internet lawyers? Pussy's by definition. Thats why they don't like guns. Or those that own them. Its not really about guns, or gun ownership, Murron. Its about the people. They detest the people that avail themselves of this basic Right. Maybe because by its very placement in the Bill of Rights, it intentionally UNDERLINES the 1st Amendment...and as we see from many articles by our liberal friends here today, they really don't like the 1st Amendment when those with differing views give voice to their opinion.
The order of the first 8 amendments was wholly random. When the B/R was introduced into Congress 2A was 4th or 5th but one of them took years to be ratified - the "Hillary" amendment in fact - and another about census enumeration was defeated. You are amazing in how often you can be so horribly off the mark in matters of general knowledge.
There are no replies to Comment # 45. End Trace Mode for Comment # 45.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Badeye (#2)
#4. To: All (#3)
(Edited)
#5. To: All (#4)
#6. To: All (#5)
#7. To: All (#6)
#24. To: war (#7)
#35. To: Murron (#24)
#37. To: Badeye (#35)
That sign encompasses exactly what Jefferson was thinking when he wrote the 2nd Amendment.
#38. To: Murron (#37)
#45. To: Boofer (#38)
(Edited)
Maybe because by its very placement in the Bill of Rights, it intentionally UNDERLINES the 1st Amendment...
Replies to Comment # 45.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]