[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat? “The sea became as the blood of a dead man and all sea creatures died.” (Rev. 16:3) Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat? The scorching of men in plague 4 is only one of the last plagues. The second plague is no more fish in the sea because of deadly tides the color of a dead man’s blood. That describes a red tide to a T. The worst red tides on Earth today are those plaguing China’s seas and the mouths of its rivers. The Chinese, more than any other humans, depend on fish for their main source of protein – necessary to sustain life. Because of the biggest dams in the world, very little fresh water makes it to the mouths of China’s rivers to keep the wetlands and seashores cool and it lets the hotter than normal ocean water creep in and heat up the shoreline to the point that massive algae blooms form that kill all of the fish except for the larger sharks and whales that are able to swim away. In previous LDC’s, we said three atheist capitals, Moscow (the whore sitting on 7 hills) and two other whores, Beijing and N. Korea, will soon be punished for their role in WW III (now underway in the Middle East and Eastern Europe). Having no fish to eat will doubtless be one of the punishments (both China and N. Korea sit on the South China Sea). What about Fish-kills and Shark Attacks in Florida? As noted above, the bigger fish, like sharks, are able to swim away from a deadly red tide and not immediately die. In addition to China, Florida has also seen a big increase in red tides and fish kills. Now the larger sharks are very hungry, and often cannot find anything to eat but humans. Fortunately, they don’t find us to be tasty, and usually spit us out. What about our Pacific and Atlantic Sea coasts? There have also been frequent fish kills along the Pacific and Atlantic shorelines of the US, especially the California and Oregon shorelines. The algae blooms there are sometimes colorless, but they are still killing fish, and even the seabirds and seals who eat the infected fish get sick, and usually die. Especially alarming is the sharp decrease in the plankton at the bottom of the food chain. During the red tides of the last decade along the west coast, there was often no detectable plankton in the samples collected by scientists. Even if the bigger fish managed to survive the red tide by swimming away, many of them succumbed later because there was very little left for them to eat. This year, another scary phenomenon is occurring. Because California's shoreline water is so hot (due to plague 4, scorching heat), very few of the menhadens (a small fish) are coming into the shallow water to spawn. Worse, seldom are speckled trout and other species that feed on them coming into the shallow bays, leaving little for fishermen to catch. What about the Texas and Louisiana coasts? (We like to include articles about local conditions. In recent years, colorless red tides have appeared every year at the mouth of the Mississippi in the summer, causing massive fish-kills and stinky shorelines mainly in Mississippi and Louisiana. But some years, the deadly tide extends all the way to Matagorda beach. Last year, a red tide appeared at the mouth of the Brazos, then spread as far as Galveston’s West Beach and Sargent’s east beach. Fishing there has largely recovered, but not so at Sargent’s (west) fishing piers or at Matagorda’s (LCRA) fishing pier. We recently visited Sargent and Matagorda and were appalled at the sad state of the beaches and the fishing piers, both adversely affected by Hurricane Beryl. Worst was Sargent Beach where there’s no longer a beach as far as you can see – just big granite rocks protecting the Intracoastal canal. There were no fishermen in sight. There were a few fishermen at Matagorda Beach, but very little was caught. The main problem is, the LCRA fishing pier once sticking ½ mile into the Gulf now extends over deep sand except for the last 2 or 3 feet. Some fishermen fish from the end, but few fish are caught in the shallow water. Solution: Instead of spending tens of $millions on more rocks and jetties and dredging (the current proposal by the Corps of Engineers), why not first transport the excess sand at Matagorda beach (between the Colorado river and the beach access road) over to Sargent beach? And dredge the mouth of the San Bernard, using that sand to conserve east Sargent beach and the historic Cedar Lake cemetery where many of the Alamo’s heroes are buried. (And perhaps build a Jettie there to protect the caskets and steer the littoral current away from the beach). And maybe dredge Mitchell’s Cut and the Colorado River to find more sand for Sargent Beach. Cutting costs, and enticing beachgoers to quickly return, bringing needed tourist dollars with them, it’s a “win-win.” Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|