[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: Jesus in his own words
Source: Gospels and Revelation
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 6, 2023
Author: Vicomte13
Post Date: 2023-10-06 20:29:32 by Vicomte13
Keywords: None
Views: 5563
Comments: 86

Revelation 22: 12-19

"Lo! I am coming swiftly, and my wage is with me, to pay each according to his works. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. Happy are those who are rinsing their robes, that it will be their license to the tree of life, and they may enter the gates of the city.

Outside are curs, and drug dealers*, and the sexually immoral, and murderers, and idolators, and everyone making and fondling lies.

I, Jesus, send my messenger** to testify these things to you in the assembly***. I am the root and the race of David, the resplendent morning star."

*The word is "pharmakeia". A "pharmakon" sold drugs to people to produce the highs and hallucinations that drugs produce. The ancients ascribed these effects to "magic", so old translations in English will say "sorcerers" or "enchanters" here, but that gives rise to the idea of what we would call a wizard, and that's not what Jesus meant at all. He was talking about the people who sold drugs to people to blow their minds. The word he used,"pharmakeia" could most literally be translated as "pharmacist," ut that would definitely give the wrong idea too. Todays pharmacists are not selling "magic" potions to blow people's minds. The proper modern equivalent of "pharmakeia" is "drug dealer".

**"Messenger" is the meaning of the world "angelos". "Angel," in English is "messenger" in English. Translators like to leave the word barely translated, as "angel", which gives rise in English - to a specific thought of a supernatural winged being. Not in Greek. "Angelos" is simply a "messenger,' whether from on high with wings, or a man with sandals. SoJesus said: he sent his messengers - winged angels or sandal-clad men - it's the message that mattered to Jesus, not the particular physical description of the messenger.

***"Assembly" is what the word "ecclesia" translates to. It literally means "those called out" - of a regular meeting to a special assembly. This is always translated into the English word "church", but that really obscures meaning. For English did not come to be until after 1100, and in 1100, the Church - capital C - was an established political structure - the Catholic Church. And "church" also refers to the specific religious buildings..And Jesus is not talking about buildings or political organizations, he is talking about assemblies of people, who follow him. "Church" is a loaded anachronism that Catholics and the Orthodox will seize upon to say "See! See! The Church ALWAYS was." But that is a distortion. Yes, there were always followers of Jesus back to the First Century. But no, they were not following all of the rites and traditions and ideas of the Catholic or Orthodox Church, not in the first century. "Assemblies of people devoted to Jesus" is what the "ecclesia" is. Therefore, the word "assembly" here is precise and apt, not the Anglcism "church", which did not exist for another 1000 years, and which carries with it all sorts of implications that Jesus was not talking about at all.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-25) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#26. To: A K A Stone (#14)

The real enemy

Is The golden calf culT

Coopting God - creaTion - science

The anTichrisT religion

EvoluTion - marxism - miracles

Turns all The zombies inTo liberals

EnlighTenment vic is a good example

ProsperiTy cargo culT pagan savage idioTs

Love
boris

If you ... don'T use exclamaTion poinTs --- you should'T be Typeing ! Commas - semicolons - quesTion marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2023-10-07   16:05:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: BorisY (#26)

Thanks, Boris.

Is your point that God did not create and does not rule the universe? I disagree.

I appreciate you calling me enlightened, I would like to think that I am.

I have no idea about the rest of it. Are you saying that I am in a golden calf antichrist religion?

That's funny, given that all I am doing is QUOTING CHRIST IN HIS OWN WORDS.

So, quoting Christ is "anti-Christ"? And I'M the idiot? Jeez Louise!

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-07   18:35:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: All (#20)

Revelation 16;15

(KJV)

"Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth and keeping his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame."

(My Greek text)

"Lo, I am coming as a thief. Happy is he that is watching and keeping his garments, that he not be walking naked and they be observing his shame."

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-07   18:43:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: All (#28) (Edited)

n

(KJV). As many as I love I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore and repent. Behold. I stand at the door and knock. If any man hear my voice and open the door, I will come in to him and sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame and am set down with my Father in his throne. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the spirit saith unto the churches."

(My Greek literal interlinear translation)

"Whosoever I may be fond of, I am exposing and disciplining. Be zealous, then, and repent! Lo! I stand at the door and am knocking. If ever anyone should be hearing my voice and opening the door, I will also be coming in and dining with him and he with me. The one who is conquering, to him will I be granting to be seated with me on my throne, as I also conquer and am seated with my Father on his throne. Who has an ear, let him hear what the spirit is saying to the assemblies."

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-07   18:59:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Vicomte13 (#28)

Would you agree that happy and blessed are very different?

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-07   19:38:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: A K A Stone (#30)

Not in Greek, no. The word is "makarios" which is probably best expressed as "fortunate".

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-07   20:24:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: All (#31)

"Happy" is probably too light a translation of "makarios". "Joyful, because of great fortune", is the sense of the world. The very wealthy and the gods of the Greeks were "makarios", because they had everything. "Blessed" would be a good word in English, but the religious connotation is not limited to Jesus and God. The Greek gods and human plutocrats were said to me "makarious" - extreme joy, having not a care in the world, living the life of Reilly - these are the connotations of this word. It is happy, but REALLY happy, because of all of the...well...blessings that one had. "Ecstatic" might be a good English equivalent, although the root word of "ecstatic" is "ecstasy", which refers to a trance-like state, and that is NOT the connotation of "makarios".

So the connotation is one of extreme joy, such as a billionaire would enjoy. Applying to plebeian people full of faith, but without means, is pretty subversive of Jesus, really. He is comparing those who have him as being that of the wealthiest, the most powerful and secure, like the gods of Olympus even. A state of extended happiness that can only be enjoyed by the privileged few is offered to everybody who follows Jesus, even if they remain dirt poor in means. Having Jesus gives on transcendent joy. "Happy" downplays that (in English); 'makarios" is more than simply happiness. But "blessed" has a wholly religious connotation that "makarios" does not have.

The Germans have an expression: "Wie der Lieber Gott im Frankreich" - "to live like God in France" - which implies to have it made, to have it all, to be joyfully at ease, wanting nothing, in a place more beautiful than here. That's "makarios". The joy of the super rich and the gods, not a care in the world.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-07   22:19:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: A K A Stone (#30) (Edited)

Revelation 3:1-18

"And vnto the Angel* of the Church of the Laodiceans, write, These things saith the Amen, the faithfull and true witnesse, the beginning of the creation** of God:

I know thy workes***, that thou art neither cold nor hot, I would thou wert cold or hot.

So then because thou art lukewarme, and neither cold nor hot, I wil spew thee out of my mouth:

Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and haue need of nothing: and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poore, and blinde, and naked.

I counsell thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest bee rich, and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakednesse doe not appeare, and anoint thine eyes with eye salue, that thou mayest see."

Notes:

*"Angelos" is simply restated here in its Greek form. In Greek, it means "messenger", and the messenger can be human or supernatural. It is a generic word for messenger, not a Greek word for a winged being. It CAN be a winged being, but the Greek does not imply that either way. Leaving the word untranslated, as "angel" implies the winged being to the English speaker 1500 years later, but that implication would not have been seen by the original Greek reader. He would have seen "messenger".

** There is an interesting Trinitarian issue here for those who care. Jesus describes himself directly as "the beginning of the creation of God", the very first created being. Trinitarians would vociferously object to that, claiming it was heresy. But Jesus himself says it, right here. It's obvious that the begotten son of God had to be begotten - perhaps before all time, so when he was begotten was not a "time." So, there was never a moment in "time" that Jesus did not exist, 'time" being a relative measurement between things, and there were no things before Jesus, as he was the beginning of the creation of things, the "first thing". But certainly in the sequence of things, before "time", there was the Father and there was not the Son. Then the Father begat the Son. The hieroglyphic sentences at the beginning of Genesis actually depict this quite graphically, but this is not common knowledge. Because Jesus says it, it is correct. Trinitarian belief needs to be corrected to this truth stated by Jesus.

***Works (or "workes"). The KJV translators were Anglicans, not Lutherans. We will see Jesus throughout revelation and the Gospels telling people they will be judged by their works, and the KJV faithfully reflects that. Luther's German translation, not the English, says " Faith ALONE", but that only appears in the German, not in the KJV, and certainly not in the original Greek. The KJV is chock full of works, such that it becomes unpleasant for the one who has bought Luther's argument that works are irrelevant, or that men can't do good works without faith in Jesus. The KJV says otherwise. Recall, please, that Jesus is not talking to the world, he is talking to the people who are already Christian, the church in Laodicea, and telling them that he will spew them out of his mouth, despite their faith. "Once saved always saved?" Nope. Not according to Jesus.

Final Note: I said I would use the KJV. This is the KJV. Later updaters CALL their updates "the KJV", in order to claim the prestige of the original, that what they have done is "the same thing." But the modern English "KJV" is not the same thing. If you believe that the KJV translation was inspired, then THIS is the only inspired text Modern, "KJVs" are new translations, not the KJV. So, I will stick with the KJV. Do I PERSONALLY think that the KJV is an "inerrant inspired translation"? No. But you do, so I've gone ahead and accepted that for these purposes. I'll use the KJV. There's nothing in the parts of the KJV that we will be reading - the words of Jesus - where the Greek conflicts with it. There are only little things, like "angel" or "blessed", words where, in Greek there's just one word that conveys a meaning, but by the time English developed there were two or more words that convey different meanings, one secular, and one religious. This was not the case in Greek. The English translators chose the religious meanings, which imparts something specific to the text that isn't really there in the original. But I am fine with the limited English meanings. Yes, what Jesus says encompasses that. He is actually saying MORE, because the Greek captures the secular meaning also.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-08   11:54:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#30)

Revelation 3:7-12 (KJV)

"And to the Angel of the Church in Philadelphia write, These things saith he that is Holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of Dauid, he that openeth, and no man shutteth, and shutteth, and no man openeth; I know thy workes: behold, I haue set before thee an open doore, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word,* and hast not denied my Name.

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Iewes, and are not, but doe lie: behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feete, and to know that I haue loued thee. Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keepe thee from the houre of temptation, which shall come vpon all the world, to try them that dwell vpon the earth.

Beholde, I come quickly, hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crowne.*

Him that ouercommeth,* will I make a pillar in the Temple of my God, and he shall goe no more out: and I wil write vpon him the Name of my God, and the name of the Citie of my God, which is new Hierusalem, which commeth downe out of heauen from my God: And I will write vpon him my New name."

Notes:

In three places I have marked with an asterisk the key theological points Jesus is making here. He knows their WORKS, and rewards them for that. And at the end, he says that he who OVERCOMES will have the prize. This is all works, acts, doing, triumphing by doing what one ought. He speaks of "keeping his word". We are going through his word, and we will find again and again and again Jesus talks about what he wants you to DO, and NOT DO. I used to have a Lutheran girlfriend, who went to a Lutheran school and was, with her sister, fully taught up in their doctrines, and believed them. Her attitude about sex (premarital, we were teenagers) was much more casual than mine. To her, it was not complicated. She was "born again", and therefore forgiven all her sins. "Once saved, always saved." I had not read the Bible yet, but was simply going on instinct. My instincts (which were from the Holy Spirit) told me that cannot possibly be right. As I got older, I did read the Bible, and honing in on Jesus, I see very clearly that it was not right, at all. That is simply not what he said.

Now, in saying that, I collide with vast swathes of Christianity. So what? How can anyone read what Jesus said to the church in Philadelphia, or the parts later in Revelation when he lists the sins that will get you thrown into the Lake of Fire, or his incessant urge to overcome, to conquer, and think that he is simply asking you to believe that he is the Son of God? Every single person IN all of the Churches to whom he sent letters believed that he was the Son of God! He's not writing to the world, he's writing to CHURCHES, for God's sake! He's writing to the angels of these Churches, the messengers who have the authority to teach what he said to others, and he's telling them point blank to keep doing their works, if they are doing good, and to stop doing works that are not good. He says he will judge you based on your works. He does not say he will judge you on your faith alone. Never.

This is the central point of my annoyance with Protestantism. The Protestants with whom I have discussed this and debated this in the past sound like Watchman, and my old girlfriend and her sister. But it's not just them. There is a stubborn certitude that what is required is a dramatic moment when on is "Born Again", and that THIS has to happen FIRST, and that WHEN it happens one "puts on the new man" and does not sin again, and starts doing good works (can't do them before. they don't count if you do), and that IF you fall, that is evidence that the original conversion was not really sincere.

Putting this as politely as possible, that's a great general theory of religion, of how everything works, and hundreds of millions of people believe that. It just is not what Jesus said, at all, ever, anywhere. A whole vast religion calls itself "Christian", but simply IGNORES Jesus and believes what they want to believe, which is very different, and rather contrary in spirit, to what he actually said.

My criticism of the Catholics and the Orthodox is different. They do not get this part wrong. They focus on Jesus pretty well. But then they add volumes, libtary wings! of ADDITIONAL stuff, that Jesus did NOT say, and say that it's all mandatory because the Church says so, and that the Church is the ultimate guide and guarantor of souls. And in the process, many of these traditions directly contradict Jesus. Most dramatically, all of the men and women murdered by the Church over the years as witches and heretics. Jesus said that MURDERERS have their part in the Lake of Fire. If you are burning a witch, you are a murderer by definition. Jesus did not say, "Well, except for witches...". In fact, when it came to sexual sin, of the sort that YHWH said deserved the death penalty in the Torah, Jesus said "Let he among you who is without sin cast the first stone. Fact is, killing somebody is a black act, pure evil. And if you're doing it in the name of Jesus, you have not only completely disregarded what he said, you have damned yourself to hell based on what he said!

The Catholic and Orthodox, and Protestant, Churches stopped killing people, but they won't admit they were wrong to have done it in the first place. They hedge, shuck and jive and say "different times". Jesus spoke these words 2000 years ago, long before the Churches existed to burn people. And yet they did burn people, LIBERALLY. The Lutherans burnt 100,000 people in Germany. The Calvininsts in Scotland burnt 20,000. This is not excusable, and I will never let up on it until my interlocutor admits to himself, to me, and to Jesus that historically their church was wrong - dead wrong - and did great evil.

And of course if the Church did great evil then, could be THAT wrong, they can still be that wrong about anything else. I assert that whenever they are doing anything that is different from what Jesus said, they are wrong. OF COURSE they are wrong! Jesus was the Son of God. Nobody else is. This is True Faith in Jesus' word: that you actually rely on it to obliterate the traditions of men that contradict it.

What he said to the Church in Philadelphia: I see what you do, and you do good. Keep doing good, don't let others lead you astray, and if you do good all the way to the end, I will reward you.

That's it, that's all. It dumbfounds me that Christians will argue - really quite viciously, for any other belief set. But they DO. Lord do they!

Hopefully you will agree with Jesus, and we can move out smartly and see him say the same things over and over and over again, really beat it in there, if there were any doubt. He's already said the same thing to two churches. One he praises, Philadelphia, and one he criticizes, threatening to spew them out of this mouth, to reject them - to reject a Church and turn his back on them - because their acts are lukewarm.

How can ANYBODY read this and say "Once saved, always saved? Works are unavailing? And Faith Alone?" It's perverse. It's directly contrary to what Jesus is saying, which is to say, if you're a Trinitarian, it's directly opposed to what God Himself said.

Why do that? It is incomprehensible to me. If you don't believe Jesus was Lord, or Divine, then don't follow him. But if you DO say he was, then why do you then substitute your own made-up doctrines for what he said? I just don't get it.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-08   15:37:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Vicomte13 (#34)

I will make them to come and worship before thy feete, and to know that I haue loued thee. Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keepe

Looks as if there are some typos. Did you type it yourself? If you did that is a lot of work. I would cut and paste from Bible Gateway or something. You can always proof read and make sure it is accurate.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   15:58:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Vicomte13 (#32)

But "blessed" has a wholly religious connotation that "makarios" does not have.

I just go with what the King James says.

But here is what google said

Makarios was the supreme blessing. Makarios is used in the Septuagint (the Greek version of the Old Testament) to describe the results of living right. It was the state of the righteous. If you enjoyed the blessings of this world, it was because you had been living right. You were being blessed.Jun 17, 2021

www.google.com/search? q=MAKAORIS+BLESSED+MEANING&oq=MAKAORIS+BLESSED+MEANING&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvb WUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDc0MTNqMGo0qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   16:03:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: All (#36)

Also to your post 32. To me it seems when people try to reinterpret the Bible in better words. That means they don't have faith in God being able to give us his word.

All the mumbo jumbo is above my pay grade.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   16:05:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Vicomte13 (#34)

In three places I have marked with an asterisk the key theological points Jesus is making here. He knows their WORKS, and rewards them for that. And at the end, he says that he who OVERCOMES will have the prize. This is all works,

I would say a prize above salvation. Still not of works lest any man should boast.

That is my take.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   16:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: A K A Stone (#37)

The problem with that, quite simply, is that the Bible is in koine Greek, not English. If you’re reading it in English, you are reading a translators interpretation.

Those typos are not typos. I copied and pasted the actual King James Bible. It was written in the English of 1611,. The “King James” Bible in modern English is itself an interpretation of the King James Bible. They are not iidentical except for updated English. Some word meanings are said to have changed.

You wanted the KJV, I am using the actual KJV. If you tell me that some later translation, in the KJV style, is ALSO inerrant, as far as you are concerned, then I will use that specific text. So, you tell me which text you will accept, and I’ll use that one.

The issues here are not issues of translation. They are issues of accepting what Jesus said.

So, tell me which Bible to use. The KJV looks like it’s full of typos to you. So what do you want me to use?

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-08   16:14:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Vicomte13 (#34)

I will continue to read what you write. You have put quite a bit of time and effort into this. Which is commendable.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   16:17:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Vicomte13 (#39)

You wanted the KJV, I am using the actual KJV.

Fair enough.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   16:18:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Vicomte13 (#34)

it happens one "puts on the new man" and does not sin again, and starts doing good works

Once you're saved you still sin. You don't never sin again. You repent when you sin.

You're going to lawyer and bury me in paperwork so to speak. But that's ok.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-08   16:22:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: A K A Stone (#38)

You have said “still not of works lest any man should boast”. Please cite that Scripture for me. Who says that?

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-08   16:50:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: A K A Stone (#42)

No I’m not. You say that men sin again - that is true. But large Christian denominations assert that you do not. If you were one of those, I would have to address it. But you aren’t so I don’t.

That’s exactly right - once people come to the realization that Jesus is the Son of God, and start listening to him, they know what is right and wrong in a cosmic sense. Now, they may have already known, for God is the God of all, and we do have the example of the society, which is largely Christian. Still, with the knowledge of Jesus’ identity, we then have a greater urge to see what he really said, to learn that. And fuzzy ideas become very clear. But we’re human, we do sin again and, knowing for sure now that we really have sinned, we need forgiveness, and Jesus will give that IF we at least try to stop sinning.

That’s all right and true, and we see the same thing (though no doubt we express that a bit differently, owing to being different people from different places.)

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-08   16:57:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: A K A Stone (#41)

I CAN use a more modern translation, a modernized KJV, so the spellings and verb tenses won’t be so weird. I do not want the text itself to be a stumbling block. You tell me what you want me to use, and I will use it. Jesus says essentially the same thing in all of them that are decent.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-08   16:59:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Vicomte13 (#34)

sound like Watchman, and my old girlfriend and her sister.

To her, it was not complicated. She was "born again", and therefore forgiven all her sins. "Once saved, always saved."

I rejoice greatly to be counted among your girlfriend and her sister as once saved always saved.

Praise God that I do not have to hold on to God, but He holds on to me and will not let me go.

Certainly, I may lose my "crown" (rewards) but I will never lose my soul. Jesus said. "I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee"

With all that is taking place right now in the ME my attention is fixed on the unfolding of prophecy. I don't have the mindset to discuss all the material you are presenting but will try to follow along with your efforts.

Question: how much failure to do "works" will cause you to lose your salvation? How does one know if he has lost his salvation?

watchman  posted on  2023-10-08   17:30:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: watchman (#46)

I don't look at it like you do. "Salvation" is not this shiny thing that one has or one loses.

Jesus asked us to do good and do right. He said to follow him and keep his word, and if you do that, you are doing good and doing right. And if you know his word, you know full well when you have stepped off the path and done wrong. It's not hard to know what Jesus wants. Just read him and he repeats it over and over and over again.

if you follow him, which he said meant keeping his word, you're good with him and he with you. So if you happen to die at any given moment, you are in his grace. If you choose not to follow him, to ignore the sick, the poor, the imprisoned, and just not care, he's told everyone that, in the end, he will say "I don't know you", no matter how much you cry out "Lord! Lord!"

'What good does it do you to say you follow me if you don't keep my commandments? He who keeps my commandments loves me.'

So, that's my answer to your question. I don't worry about my salvation, because I am always worried about the poor and how I conduct myself. I use Jesus' word as the standard. So I'm with him, and he with me, exactly as he promised. And to me, that's that.

You have a completely different approach. That's ok, as long as you are actually doing what Jesus said to do. THAT is all that matters, according to him anyway. And given that it's called CHRISTianity, it seems to me that what Christ says is all that matters.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   7:57:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: All (#47)

And IF you step off the path and do wrong, Jesus tells you to repent and go back to doing right. He forgives. But it does you no good to "believe" in him if you don't keep his commandments, and his commandments require specific actions. He said all of this, multiple times. It's not even a little bit hard to understand.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   8:46:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: A K A Stone (#42)

Moving along - Revelation 3:1-5

And vnto the Angel of the Church in Sardis write, These things saith he that hath the seuen Spirits of God, & the seuen starres; I know thy workes, that thou hast a name that thou liuest, and art dead. Be watchfull, and strengthen the things which remaine, that are ready to die: for I haue not found thy works perfect before God.*. Remember therefore, how thou hast receiued and heard, and hold fast, and repent.* If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thiefe, and thou shalt not know what houre I will come vpon thee.

Thou hast a few names euen in Sardis, which haue not defiled their garments, and they shall walke with me in white: for they are worthy.

Hee that ouercommeth, the same shalbe clothed in white raiment, and I will not blot out his name out of the booke of life,* but I will confesse his name before my Father, and before his Angels."

NOTES: * I have starred the same argument again:

(1) I see your works and they are very imperfect.

(2) Remember what I said and turn back - repent! - and do what I said to do.

(3) Or your name, which WAS written in the book of life, I will blot out instead.

This is not once saved, always saved. It's the opposite. It's: you heard me and followed, and so were written in the book of life. But now you're not following, and if you don't go back and do what I told you to do, I will blot out your name from the book of life where it currently is.

This is the gaining of salvation, but then losing it because one does not persevere in doing what Jesus commanded.

Why kick at the goad? Just do what Jesus said to do, and it will go well for you.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   10:45:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Vicomte13 (#49)

Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.

3 Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent.

Yes nobody has the works to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. It seems to me it says to repent because your works aren't there. It doesn't say get your works better.

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-09   13:52:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Vicomte13 (#49) (Edited)

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-09   13:59:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: A K A Stone (#50)

Ok, but let's not skip over this part:

"Thou hast a few names euen in Sardis, which haue not defiled their garments, and they shall walke with me in white: for they are worthy."

There are those in Sardis who works ARE good enough, who have NOT done evil. It isn't impossible to follow Jesus' words. He does not demand things that people cannot do, and he often notes those who do them. His yoke is easy and his burden is light.

In Philadelphia, the whole church was walking in his word, and he did not rebuke them. He merely told them to keep doing it.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   14:47:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Vicomte13 (#47)

Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Are you born again?

watchman  posted on  2023-10-09   15:34:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Vicomte13 (#49)

Or your name, which WAS written in the book of life, I will blot out instead.

Your words are error. You have reworded the scripture to fit your argument.

The Chruch at Sardis was a "dead church" full of unsaved people. The "dead" church goers were NEVER written in the book of life. There were a few saved souls, however, who WERE written in the book of life and those are the ones who will never be blotted out...once saved, always saved.

You, Vic, are a dead church goer who goes to a dead church. Your name is not yet written in the book of life.

watchman  posted on  2023-10-09   15:50:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: watchman (#54)

I did not change the words of Scripture. I quoted the 1611 King James Version verbatim.

Your argument is with Jesus, not with me.

See, this is precisely why I do this: I just quote Jesus, nobody else. Your beef is with what Jesus said, because it does not mesh with what you believe.

You're attacking me because you don't like what is written, but those words were dictated by Jesus, not by Stephen.

You can rail at me all you like. I'm sticking with Jesus.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   16:00:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: A K A Stone (#51)

That's nice. But he's quoting a letter of John. If you want me to listen, then quote Jesus. I will listen to Jesus. Jesus said all that needs to be said, and he's clear as a bell.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   16:02:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Vicomte13 (#55)

This is a new low for you.

watchman  posted on  2023-10-09   16:26:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: watchman (#57)

Quoting Jesus verbatim is a new low? Go figure.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   16:30:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: A K A Stone (#51)

Continuing on - Revelation 2:18-29

And vnto the Angel of the church in Thyatira, write, These things saith the Sonne of God, who hath his eyes like vnto a flame of fire, and his feete are like fine brasse:

I know thy works,* and charitie, and seruice, and faith, and thy patience, and thy workes,* and the last to bee more then the first.*

Notwithstanding, I haue a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Iezebel, which calleth herselfe a Prophetesse, to teach and to seduce my seruants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed vnto idoles.

And I gaue her space to repent of her fornication, and she repented not.

Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her, into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.

And I will kill her children with death, and all the Churches shall know that I am hee which searcheth the reines and hearts: and I will giue vnto euery one of you according to your workes.*

But vnto you I say, and vnto the rest in Thyatira, as many as haue not this doctrine, and which haue not knowen the depthes of Satan, as they speake, I will put vpon you none other burden: But that which ye haue already, hold fast till I come.*

And hee that ouercommeth, and keepeth my workes* vnto the ende, to him will I giue power ouer the nations:

(And he shall rule them with a rod of yron: as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shiuers:) euen as I receiued of my Father. And I will giue him the morning starre.

He that hath an eare, let him heare what the Spirit saith vnto the Churches.

_________________

NOTES

* Works here, works there, so many works! And he mentions the bad works of a slutty woman, while calling her to repent - to stop doing those works. But the rest of the people? He tells them to keep on doing what they're doing - those works - and endure to the end.

This is very clear and straightforward. I told you what to do, so do it, and if you persevere to the end in doing it, I will give you life eternal. Nothing hard to understand about that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   16:43:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Vicomte13 (#56)

Yes im quoting from the Bible. Hiw will you k n ow when your works are good enough to make you worthy?

Do you have to have works to enter Heaven?

A K A Stone  posted on  2023-10-09   17:07:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Vicomte13 (#58)

Or your name, which WAS written in the book of life

Show me where Jesus said that the "dead" Sardis church goers are written in the book of life.

I will blot

You took out the word "not". Jesus says He will NOT blot out, referring only to those who are alive in Christ

watchman  posted on  2023-10-09   17:11:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#60)

I know that if I did what Jesus said to do that I will have eternal life, because Jesus said that. He laid out what he wants specifically, and told everybody to keep his word, his commandments. He said if you do, he will be with you and you with him. It's not hard to understand.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   17:57:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: watchman (#61) (Edited)

I copied and pasted right out of the KJV, hoss. I didn't change anything. Is there something in error, then, in the KJV?

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   17:59:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: watchman (#61)

I was curious about what you were on about, so I went back and looked at the passage. It is this:

"Hee that ouercommeth, the same shalbe clothed in white raiment, and I will not blot out his name out of the booke of life,"

What is hard to understand about this?

Jesus blots people's name out of the book of life. He won't do so to those in Sardis who overcome - who resist and keep his word. He'll cloth THEM in white raiment and leave their names in the book of life.

But what about those in the Church of Sardis who DON'T overcome, who DON'T keep his word?

They will not wear the white raiment, and he will blot their names out.

That is the implication of saying he WON'T blot out those who do as he says, that whoever DOESN'T, DOES get blotted out of the book of life. Their names are there because they are in the Church, but their behavior causes him to blot them out.

How can this be read any other way? Seriously.

I said before that you have a reading comprehension problem, and I really think you do.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   18:25:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Vicomte13 (#64)

You failed to account for this verse.

Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy.

Christ differentiates between those who are "dead", and those (few) who are "worthy" (saved).

"He who overcomes" is an invitation to those who are "dead" to become saved, to have their names written in the book of life.

"I will not blot out" does not imply that He has, or will ever, blot out someone's name. It is merely away of stating an assurance of salvation.

Revelation mentions the Book of Life seven times with one other mention in Philippians:

Philippians 4:3 And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life.

Revelation 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.

Revelation 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

Revelation 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Revelation 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

Revelation 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Revelation 21:27 And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.

Revelation 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Note on Revelation 22:19:

God shall take away his part out of the book of life - Perhaps there is here an intimation that this would be most likely to be done by those who professed to be Christians, and who supposed that their names were in the book of life. In fact, most of the corruptions of the sacred Scriptures have been attempted by those who have professed some form of Christianity. Infidels have but little interest in attempting such changes, and but little influence to make them received by the church. It is most convenient for them, as it is most agreeable to their feelings, to reject the Bible altogether. When it said here that "God would take away his part out of the book of life," the meaning is not that his name had been written in that book, but that he would take away the part which he might have had, or which he professed to have in that book. Such corruption of the divine oracles would show that they had no true religion, and would be excluded from heaven. (Barnes)

The note addresses your condition...one who merely professes Christianity. But even more, that you took a word out of the Holy Scripture (the word "not") which changed the whole truth of God's saving grace.

watchman  posted on  2023-10-09   19:35:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: watchman (#65)

Jesus said he would not blot out from the book the names of those who kept their garments and continued to follow him. This means that Jesus could, and did, blot out the names of those who did not.

You say he never could. He says otherwise.

I'll stick with.the plain reading of Jesus.

Vicomte13  posted on  2023-10-09   23:12:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (67 - 86) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com