Amidst the dross that clutters the New York Times op-ed page on most days, glimmers of enlightenment occasionally appear. A recent guest column by Grey Anderson and Thomas Meaney offers a case in point. NATO Isnt What It Says It Is, declares the headline. Contrary to the claims of its architects and defenders, Anderson and Meaney argue persuasively that the central purpose of the alliance from its founding was not to deter aggression from the East and certainly not to promote democracy, but to bind Western Europe to a far vaster project of a U.S.- led world order. In return for Cold War-era security guarantees, Americas European allies offered deference and concessions on issues like trade and monetary policy. In that mission, they write, NATO has proved remarkably successful. A plot of real estate especially valued by members of the American elite, Europe thereby became the centerpiece of the postwar American imperium.
Click for Full Text!