Under Obama foreign policy, this guy would be still doing this to other people.
Heres a BIG Difference Between Bush and Obama Policy 2010 March 3 by David Forsmark
Under Obama foreign policy, this guy would be still doing this to other people.
Ryan Mauro replied to my post that it does matter whether Republicans and Democrats are in charge of foreign policy with this fair point:
David Forsmark replied to my post about the George W. Obama Administration here, titled Yes, Ryan, There IS a Difference Between the 2 Parties on National Security. Just a little clarification: I was comparing the Obama and Bush Administrations, not necessarily both parties, and I didnt say there was no difference at all, just nothing really decisive in my opinion.
Well, Id say Saddam could point out one decisive difference for you, Ryan.
And, as you yourself point out, the surge would not have happened under Obama and Iraq would be well on its way to slipping back into tyranny.
Moreover, giving Obama credit that CIA interrogators are not being prosecuted, that KSM is not being tried in New York, or that the Patriot Act was renewed thanks to public pressure (and great work by Congressmen Pete Hoekstra and Peter King holding their feet to the public fire) is like giving the Clintons credit that Hillarycare did not become reality.
Yes, Obama has sometimes bowed to reality, particularly in foreign policy. But every instinct of this Administration has initially taken it in the opposite direction until it had to be dragged kicking and screaming to a politically defensible position.
The fact that this has not led to a major disaster yet, is just good fortune. I would rather not have to bet on it continuing.