International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Global warming Guru Admits It's All Bullshit
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://tarpon.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/phil-jones-questioned/
Published: Feb 24, 2010
Author: tarpon.wordpress
Post Date: 2010-02-24 12:12:15 by dont eat that
Keywords: None
Views: 1959
Comments: 13
In case you don’t know, Phil Jones was the director of CRU, the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit(CRU), until they removed him from that post because of climate-gate … In today’s BBC — “Climate data ‘not well organised‘”, and here is the Q&A part of the interview he gave to investigators: First question labeled ‘A’” A – Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical? And the response: So, in answer to the question, the warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other. Specifically, the Q-and-As confirm what many skeptics have long suspected: * Neither the rate nor magnitude of recent warming is exceptional. * There was no significant warming from 1998-2009. According to the IPCC we should have seen a global temperature increase of at least 0.2°C per decade. * The IPCC models may have overestimated the climate sensitivity for greenhouse gases, underestimated natural variability, or both. * This also suggests that there is a systematic upward bias in the impacts estimates based on these models just from this factor alone. * The logic behind attribution of current warming to well-mixed man-made greenhouse gases is faulty. * The science is not settled, however unsettling that might be * There is a tendency in the IPCC reports to leave out inconvenient findings, especially in the part(s) most likely to be read by policy makers. Yes — Phil gave up the whole game. No unprecedented warming since 1995. The hockey stick has kinks as big as the paddle again. 1998, it’s not the warmest ever. He gave up all the talking points that the whole battle has been waged for. They have zero rational argument and there is zero doubt. Now can we have trials, please? It really would be timely and we’ve been ever so patient. Footnote: The CRU is the UN’s main climate unit, where they get all their data for the main IPCC AR4 report. The one that allegedly won a Nobel prize for.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: dont eat that (#0)
One would do well to read the entire interview rather than this B.S.:
Being a Republican means you get to choose your own reality.
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8511670.stm Padlock works as a propagandist in the coal industry...'nuff said...
Day 3 of Packrat refusing to register here.
And can you point to anything in the full interview which contradicts the POV displayed here?
Global Warming has been shown to be a scam. The debate is over.
my anti groupie can't get through life without me.
It would appear even the main moonbat players are starting to have to admit that: http://tarpon.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/agw-hoax-today-is-a-new-day-for-the-un-ipcc-they-start-all-over/
Hey Goldi...point out where he claims it's bullshit. Thanks...
Day 3 of Packrat refusing to register here.
Do you think he would actually admit it in those words?
Yes, but those brain dead kool aid drinkers on the Left won't. Watch.
my anti groupie can't get through life without me.
So you admit that you lied about the substance of the article... Thanks...
Day 3 of Packrat refusing to register here.
Contrary. I hit the SUBSTANCE of the article on the nose.
Nothing in the article supports either your or the writer's opinion. You can't even meet your own challenge...
Day 3 of Packrat refusing to register here.
He gave up all the talking points that the whole battle has been waged for. They have zero rational argument and there is zero doubt. IOW, it's all bullshit.
Point out the quote of Phil's or don't respond... Thanks...
Day 3 of Packrat refusing to register here.
#2. To: go65 (#1)
One would do well to read the entire interview rather than this B.S.:
#3. To: go65 (#1)
#4. To: go65 (#1)
#5. To: Badeye (#4)
Global Warming has been shown to be a scam.
#6. To: dont eat that (#3)
(Edited)
#7. To: war (#6)
#8. To: dont eat that (#5)
#9. To: dont eat that. A K A Stone (#7)
Do you think he would actually admit it in those words?
#10. To: war (#9)
So you admit that you lied about the substance of the article...
#11. To: dont eat that (#10)
#12. To: war (#11)
Yes — Phil gave up the whole game. No unprecedented warming since 1995. The hockey stick has kinks as big as the paddle again. 1998, it’s not the warmest ever.
#13. To: dont eat that (#12)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]