United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Months after Trump complaints, some courts are finding irregularities in 2020 elections
Source:
just the news
URL Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-po ... ourts-are-finding-illegalities
Published: Mar 18, 2021
Author: john solomon
Post Date: 2021-03-18 19:47:15 by tankumo
Keywords: None
Views: 3310
Comments: 5
Long after former President Donald Trump dropped his legal challenges to the 2020 election, some courts in battleground states are beginning to declare the way widespread absentee ballots were implemented or counted violated state laws.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: tankumo, and Everyone (#0)
The author cites “only” 3 cases out of the “multitude” of cases filed. “Lord only knows” how many cases were filed. But it is known that since Donald Trump lost in November 2020, Donald Trump, Republicans and others have filed and lost at least 63 [latest published account] lawsuits contesting election processes. And yet not a single court has ever found one iota of any evidence whatsoever supporting the alleged “FRAUD” charges. So, what is the significance of this article? Someone tell me, since I can none. Well, maybe there is one. And that would be, the continuance to: Get over it. Trump LOST the election. Move on … I posted this article – US election 2020: Why Donald Trump lost – after Biden had been officially declared the winner. Stone then decided to delete it because he said “Trump had not lost the election.” Oh, well – So much for “denial.” We shall see if Stone will now let this post stand or delete it like he does to so many of my posts. It is tragic that denial can be harmful in that denying reality enables someone to continue engaging in bad irresponsible behavior. C'est la vie …
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
Drumwaster > ProbStat 16 hours ago Actually, no court ruled on anything regarding the evidence, because it was never allowed to reach that point, as I wrote above. It seems YOU have the issue with reading. And you might wish to look up the meaning of "void ab initio", which is what Joe Biden's prsidency will be declared, once a court of competent jurisdiction gets to see the evidence. If a lottery winner is found to have been declared the winner through fraud and deceit, is he/she allowed to keep their alleged winnings? If a student is discovered to have been cheating on an exam, with they be permitted to keep the high grade their cheating gained them? Actual fact: Kamala Harris does not qualify as a United States citizen, because the "anchor baby" claims authorized under modern US law was not ruled on until four years after she was born to foreign citizens who 1) were not subject to the laws of the United States, and 2) were not attempting to make their student housing in California any sort of permanent dwelling. That makes Kamala a citizen of Jamaica, not the United States, and thus, ineligible to hold the office of President, and because of that, is also ineligible to hold the office of Vice President, as defined by the plain text of the Constitution. Were you born gullible ... was there --- some terrible accident? https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/03/25/this- may-have-been-the-dumbest-line-of-bidens-painful-press-conference- n1435067
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
… some courts in battleground states are beginning to declare the way widespread absentee ballots were implemented or counted violated state laws. 
Replies to Comment # 1.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]