[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: EVIDENCE
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://donaldwon.com/evidence/
Published: Dec 3, 2020
Author: Media
Post Date: 2020-12-03 08:20:29 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 9993
Comments: 43

Audit the Election Wiki. A guide to all evidence that has been vetted and is in process of vetting

Evidence of fractional voting in Virginia

PROOF: Michigan votes were counted in a scheme called ranked choice voting algorithm ie fractional voting.

Georgia KRAKEN water leak was a decoy after all!! (see page 7 of document)

WATCH: Crowd gasps after finding out that a mysterious spike of votes in Pennsylvania had 600,000 votes for Biden and only 3,200 for @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/Sa1n3jpyhf

Greenlee County Arizona, faulty upload causes “glitch” adding 6,000 false Biden votes

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#5. To: A K A Stone (#0)

EVIDENCE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-03   17:36:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: nolu chan (#5)

That's some pretty good evidence. Deserves its own thread.

A K A Stone  posted on  2020-12-03   19:43:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#6)

EVIDENCE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Za3OKNKG-8&feature=emb_logo

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-04   15:21:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: nolu chan (#9)

I was just watching that and getting ready to post it. Getting interesting.

A K A Stone  posted on  2020-12-04   18:06:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: A K A Stone (#10)

The shitshow has begun.

EVIDENCE: SINGLE STACK PROCESSED THREE TIMES

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-04   19:59:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: nolu chan (#11)

How did she know that stack of ballots favored Biden?

misterwhite  posted on  2020-12-05   14:27:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: misterwhite (#12)

How did she know that stack of ballots favored Biden?

Why would she run a random stack three times?

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-05   17:28:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: nolu chan (#17) (Edited)

banned.video/watch? id=5fcd5dc23cb31966a1b92ade

A K A Stone  posted on  2020-12-06   21:52:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: A K A Stone (#22)

www.thegatewaypundit.com/...atl-mayor-keisha-bottoms/

- - - - - - - - - -

Also, the guy with his back to the camera during the USB drive passoff (with Ruby and Shaye) has been identified as Lawrence Sloan and apparently he is the same guy who featured in an earlier video opening ballot envelopes, got mad, gestured the finger, crunched some paper up and threw it in the trash. Ruby canceled a new interview today and lawyered up.

www.wabe.org/why-an-elect...georgia-went-into-hiding/

freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3912855/posts?page=18#18

See below video at 2:55

www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKcPoCNW8AA

Listen to Shaye tell Lawrence "You're gonna get caught."

thedonald.win/p/11QlP3guF...rubys-daughter-saying-/c/

- - - - - - - - - -

MOST IMPORTANT:

Hearing Justice Alito had scheduled for 9 Dec (one day after the drop dead date) has been rescheduled to 0900 on 8 Dec 2020, bringing it within the window of opportunity for judicial intervention.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/...ia-lawsuit-flip-election/

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-06   23:54:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: nolu chan (#23)

This is Frei on the recent Texas move.

What do you think?

youtu.be/v-tb11okydc

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2020-12-08   21:58:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

#27. To: Dead Culture Watch (#26)

I like Frei and find his all his analyses quite informative. FYI, I understand that the Texas suit has now been joined by Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota.

Other Kracken lawsuits appear to have been theatrics designed to appeal to public opinion but with little chance of ever reaching any judicial consideration of the merits of the case. They fall to attacks on jurisdiction, standing or laches (untimely filing).

The most salient point of attack against Texas, as referenced by Frei, is standing. By having a state be a party, original jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court is assured under U.S. Const. Art. 3, Sec. 2, Cl. 2 "In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."

Frei did not discuss standing at length and it may be a real dogfight at Scotus. See the Lin Wood petition request and how it was shot down on standing:

The standing inquiry is threefold: “The litigant must prove (1) an injury in fact that (2) is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and (3) is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.” Jacobson v. Fla. Sec'y of State, 974 F.3d 1236, 1245 (11th Cir. 2020) (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561). Wood must “demonstrate standing for each claim he seeks to press and for each form of relief that is sought”—Town of Chester, N.Y. v. Laroe Estates, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1645, 1650 (2017)—and shoulders “the burden of establishing [each] element[ ].” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561.

Injury in fact is “the first and foremost of standing's three elements” and requires Wood to show that he suffered “an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” Spokeo, 136 S. Ct. at 1547-48. To be “particularized,” the alleged injury “must affect the plaintiff in a personal and individual way.” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561 n.1. Wood must demonstrate “a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy,” as a federal court “is not a forum for generalized grievances.” Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 1916, 1929 (2018). This requires more than a mere “keen interest in the issue.” Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2416 (2018). The alleged injury must be “distinct from a generally available grievance about government.” Gill, 138 S. Ct. at 1923. See also id. at 1929 (explaining that a person's “right to vote is individual and personal in nature . . . [t]hus [only] voters who allege facts showing disadvantage to themselves as individuals have standing to sue to remedy that disadvantage”) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 561 (1964); Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 206 (1962)). Claims premised on allegations that “the law . . . has not been followed . . . [are] precisely the kind of undifferentiated, generalized grievance about the conduct of government . . . [and] quite different from the sorts of injuries alleged by plaintiffs in voting rights cases where we have found standing.” Dillard v. Chilton Cnty. Comm'n, 495 F.3d 1324, 1332-33 (11th Cir. 2007) (citing Baker, 369 U.S. at 207-08). See also Lance v. Coffman, 549 U.S. 437, 440­41 (2007) (“Our refusal to serve as a forum for generalized grievances has a lengthy pedigree. . . . [A] generalized grievance that is plainly undifferentiated and common to all members of the public” is not sufficient for standing).

Wood alleges he has standing because he is “a qualified registered elector residing in Fulton County, Georgia” who has “made donations to various Republican candidates on the ballot for the November 3, 2020 elections, and his interests are aligned with those of the Georgia Republican Party for the purposes of the instant lawsuit.” These allegations fall far short of demonstrating that Wood has standing to assert these claims.

It is all technical, but it is a big threat to gaining consideration on the merits. The attorneys in the prior lawsuits are too god to believe they had standing based on being registered voters. The Texas lawsuit is unique and different.

There has been much discussion of the merit arguments of various lawsuits, but not much on the technical requirements. The technical aspect is the real battle.

On the merits, Helen Keller could see massive fraud and unlawful irregularities. The analysis of the underlying data using Benford's Law indicated that the data patterns were highly irregular and strongly indicated they resulted from some form of human intervention. Benford's Law does not identify fraud, but identifies anomalies in large sets of data. It is absolutely impartial and is merely an observation of the nature of the data itself.

The statistical analyses render the results all but impossible due to natural causes. But wait, there's more. We have video of one lady running the same stack of ballots thru a machine for about ten minutes, over and over. We have machines changing votes. It does not matter how or to whom. It is not a glitch, it is a feature. It is an unexplained feature. Why is it there at all?

There are contracts where all right to look at the source code is given away by the state or county. The ownership of the manufacturer is shrouded in secrecy and shell companies.

I believe the corruption is real and apparent and the rogue states have no valid defense on the merits. However bad it reeks of corruption, the fight will be over getting the merits of the case before the court for consideration. Other cases appear to have been for show, to while away time while gaining information and raising public awareness. This will be fought near the deadline where a judicial intervention will have a drastic effect.

The 12th Amendment provides, in part:

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

Note that if a state does not certify a slate of appointed electors, the number for a majority is reduced. The number is not 270, but a majority of the electors appointed. It has historically happened where a state failed to certify any electors. It is not necessary for Trump to get more delegates by being awarded more states. If a sufficient number of challenged states do not certify appointed electors to the point where Biden has fewer EC votes than Trump, Trump may win.

Note the prayer for relief and the alternatives within:

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff States respectfully request that this Court issue the following relief:

A. Declare that Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

B. Declare that any electoral college votes cast by such presidential electors appointed in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and cannot be counted.

C. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College.

D. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College and authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors.

E. If any of Defendant States have already appointed presidential electors to the Electoral College using the 2020 election results, direct such States’ legislatures, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 and U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2, to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment, or to appoint no presidential electors at all.

F. Enjoin the Defendant States from certifying presidential electors or otherwise meeting for purposes of the electoral college pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 5, 3 U.S.C. § 7, or applicable law pending further order of this Court.

G. Award costs to Plaintiff State.

H. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

The real questions to be decided by the court will be whether Texas has standing for this lawsuit, and whether the court has authority to grant the requested relief.

Scotus has ordered the defendant states to file replies.

Dec 08 2020

Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay requested, due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm.

This is a significant effort by Texas.

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-09 02:29:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Dead Culture Watch, Pinguinite, A K A Stone (#26)

Re Texas v. Pennsylvania et al, Missouri filed an Amicus brief, joined by 16 other states.

Counting Texas, that now makes 18 states. That is now more than one-third of the entire union.

Amici curiae are the States of Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia

nolu chan  posted on  2020-12-09 16:30:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com