Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Episode 1201 Scott Adams: Watch Me Monetize My Dumbest Critics While Discussing Election Allegations
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6OU3SgvUk4
Published: Nov 29, 2020
Author: Scott Adams
Post Date: 2020-11-29 18:29:17 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 3897
Comments: 13
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#1. To: Gatlin, Deckard (#0)
I think you would enjoy his podcast. In this episode he lays out what could be Trumps strategy. Hint it isn't certiification or court cases. It has to do with perceptions. Enjoy Deckard would probably enjoy too.
Enjoy I am a news hawk – and you know that. Stone, I sincerely thank you for the heads up – I really do. However, I am a speed reader and therefore I have neither the patience or time to sit and listen to an hour and 17 minutes of pod cast. I only watch the first few minutes of these podcasts and if it furnishes no information that I can search the Internet with – then I leave. I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news. If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none. But again, I do thank you for the heads up. And I always read the entire “print” information in the links you post. Keep the links coming …
Willingly ignorant. I will be hesitant to share good information with you in the future.
This says it all: Gatlin: I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news. If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none. Constant scan for news, huh? ***** All you can do Gatlin and what you have been doing all along is to side with the liberal Mockingbird media as they and you attempt to undermine the President while he and his legal team are working around the clock to expose this rampant corruption. Surrendering to the enemy is apparently what you have decided to do here. Your egotistical bloviating about your military experience pales in relevance to what you have become today...a coward, happily ceding the nation to socialism and refusing to support your Commander in Chief, one whom you so vigorously supported - until this, his investigating and exposing election fraud. Then you turn on him like a rabid dog while raising the white flag of surrender. Remember these words Tater? These are your words in fact: I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans. Not only is he "making an ass of himself", but in your highly esteemed medical opinion, Trump is acting irrationally by pursuing every legal channel to bring this to the light. Shame on you Sir!
This says it all: It says nothing at all. It simply shows two words you took out of context. If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none. That is true. You repeating it does not make it untrue – It even emphasizes and substantiates it more. What is the “huh” for – Can you show in any way that I do not? Bullshit. All I can do is to repeatedly ask to be shown firm evidence of fraud that prevented Trump from being elected. No one can do that. And since no once can, all they have to offer is a barrage of personal attacks of the nature you are undertaking now. Asking for facts is “surrendering to the enemy” – How so? What did you do at Udorn RTAFB and what rank did you hold? I am called “a coward” because I simply ask for proof? That makes no sense. It does however again reinforce my statement that is lieu of proof – all yu can do is launch into a person attack. Which, of course – does nothing … Oh, such drama. How is me asking for proof “ceding the nation to socialism?” Explain, please … I support him when he is right – I am however no “blind loyalist” when he is wrong. Are you a “blind loyalist” when he is wrong? If so – Then why? See my comment above. Exactly where has he “exposed election fraud” that will overturn the election? That’s what I have been asking all along. Take off your “drama queen dress” and get on to facts. And show me where election fraud cause Trump to lose the election. Not only is he "making an ass of himself", but in your highly esteemed medical opinion, Trump is acting irrationally by pursuing every legal channel to bring this to the light. I remember those words, like I wrote them yesterday – Wait, I did, or was it theday before? Thank you for emphasizing them again – You are a most gracious person. “Shame on me” for what? If insisting that facts be provided to support allegations – then I will proudly wear that cloak. And the award for the best performance in drama on the thread – goes to … DECKARD … … BRAVO – BRAVO – BRAVO …
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: A K A Stone (#1)
I think you would enjoy his podcast. In this episode he lays out what could be Trumps strategy. Hint it isn't certiification or court cases. It has to do with perceptions.
#3. To: Gatlin (#2)
#4. To: A K A Stone, Gatlin (#3)
(Edited)
Willingly ignorant.
#7. To: Deckard, aLL (#4)
Willingly ignorant. Gatlin: I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news. Constant scan for news, huh? All you can do Gatlin and what you have been doing all along is to side with the liberal Mockingbird media as they and you attempt to undermine the President while he and his legal team are working around the clock to expose this rampant corruption. Surrendering to the enemy is apparently what you have decided to do here. Your egotistical bloviating about your military experience … … pales in relevance to what you have become today...a coward … .. happily ceding the nation to socialism .. … and refusing to support your Commander in Chief … … one whom you so vigorously supported - until this … … his investigating and exposing election fraud … Then you turn on him like a rabid dog while raising the white flag of surrender. Remember these words Tater? These are your words in fact: Kp> I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans. Shame on you Sir! 
Replies to Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]