Title: Episode 1201 Scott Adams: Watch Me Monetize My Dumbest Critics While Discussing Election Allegations Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6OU3SgvUk4 Published:Nov 29, 2020 Author:Scott Adams Post Date:2020-11-29 18:29:17 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:4587 Comments:13
I think you would enjoy his podcast. In this episode he lays out what could be Trumps strategy. Hint it isn't certiification or court cases. It has to do with perceptions.
I think you would enjoy his podcast. In this episode he lays out what could be Trumps strategy. Hint it isn't certiification or court cases. It has to do with perceptions.
Enjoy
I am a news hawk – and you know that.
Stone, I sincerely thank you for the heads up – I really do.
However, I am a speed reader and therefore I have neither the patience or time to sit and listen to an hour and 17 minutes of pod cast.
I only watch the first few minutes of these podcasts and if it furnishes no information that I can search the Internet with – then I leave.
I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news.
If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none.
But again, I do thank you for the heads up.
And I always read the entire “print” information in the links you post.
I have neither the patience or time to sit and listen to an hour and 17 minutes of pod cast.
How about 5 minutes of your time? Cued to relevant portion:
Of course, I will gladly spend that time for that.
And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins – and explain why you think that it is “relevant.”
And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins
If you had actually clicked on the video I provided, it would have taken you directly to the portion of the video that I found relevant to the discussion. In other words, it was cued ahead to 5:49.
Since you had to ask, it's obvious that you didn't bother to play the shortened video I posted.
Watch it, don't watch it - I don't care. At least be honest about watching it.
And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins
If you had actually clicked on the video I provided, it would have taken you directly to the portion of the video that I found relevant to the discussion. In other words, it was cued ahead to 5:49.
I thought you were posting the original video again.
I apologize [MAKE A NOTE OF THAT].
Okay, I have looked at your video now.
And I am just not seeing what you want me to see.
I am still seeing a 62-year-old multimillionaire spouting gobbledygook and doing a great impersonation of Peter Sellers in the movie Doctor Strangelove - all the while providing no evidence of anything.
So, I ask you to please stop with the personal attacks to tell me – and everyone – exactly what you are seeing that is so all God danged important that we should know.
