Title: Pennsylvania judge blocks state from certifying election results in presidential and all other races. Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.scribd.com/document/485797248/620-MD-2020-Order-Nov-25 Published:Nov 25, 2020 Author:PA Court Post Date:2020-11-25 12:51:43 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:2487 Comments:27
Despite weeks of extreme rhetoric and failed lawsuits from President Donald Trump, Pennsylvania’s top elections official certified the state’s presidential election results on Tuesday, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner and paving the way for him to receive the state’s 20 Electoral College votes next month.
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar made the final count official three weeks after the Nov. 3 election: Biden received 3,458,229 votes, 80,555 more than President Donald Trump’s 3,377,674 votes. Biden won 50.01% of the vote to 48.8% for Trump.
Gov. Tom Wolf then signed what is called the Certificate of Ascertainment to name the 20 Biden electors who will meet in Harrisburg on Dec. 14 to formally cast the votes for Biden.
Is it true that you didn't watch the video I presented to you?
Trump won everyone knows it.
That is why the election book is missing from Detroit. That is whythey covered up the windows so people couldn't see. That is why they chased poll watchers away. Why are 47 usb drives missing and why did they violate the law and mass mail ballots?
Trump won if you think differently you can go ahead and die. You wouldn't be missed. Well you wouldn't. No one would even know.
The Washington Examiner is a conservative news site and warns Donald Trump: “Concede And Move On.”
It said the president’s legal team “looks as though it is flinging mud to see what sticks” in its bid to overturn the election result.
The Washington Examiner urged President Donald Trump to “move on” and accept defeat in the 2020 election in an editorial published Friday.
The conservative news outlet warned that Trump’s ongoing attempts to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s victory could jeopardize the GOP candidates running for Georgia’s two Senate seats in January runoff elections, and thus cost the Republican Party its control of the Senate.
The site has called out Trump before, but often strikes a friendly tone on the president.
The editorial argues that Trump had the right to legally challenge alleged election “irregularities, mistakes, fraud, or all three,” but that Trump’s legal team has failed to prove the allegations and now “increasingly looks as though it is flinging mud to see what sticks, rather than pursuing a coherent course of litigation.”
The newspaper said Trump’s desperate bid for a second term will fail and is distracting “from the really important task of keeping the Senate in Republican hands.”
“If Trump wishes people to believe he has the good of the country and the legitimacy of its elections in mind, the president should concede that he lost and should do all he can to help his party win the two Senate battles in which it is still engaged,” it concluded.
“If Trump wishes people to believe he has the good of the country and the legitimacy of its elections in mind, the president should concede that he lost and should do all he can to help his party win the two Senate battles in which it is still engaged,” it concluded.
It's not up to the media to decide when Trump concedes. It's up to him.
He has every constitutional right to get to the bottom of voter fraud and Democrat complicity in stealing the election.
If Trump wishes people to believe he has the good of the country and the legitimacy of its elections in mind, the president should concede that he lost and should do all he can to help his party win the two Senate battles in which it is still engaged,” it concluded.
It's not up to the media to decide when Trump concedes. It's up to him.
You are correct when you say, “It's not up to the media to decide when Trump concedes.”
But, the media is not deciding anything – Dipshit. That is merely an “editorial.”
You obviously don’t comprehend what an “editorial” actually is.
So, l et this “ole sage fellow” help you out …
An editorial is a newspaper article written by or on behalf of an editor that gives an opinion on a topical issue.
It’s an “opinion” – and they have a constitutional right to express their opinion. So, clear your mind and realize that they are deciding nothing.
He [Trump] has every constitutional right to get to the bottom of voter fraud and Democrat complicity in stealing the election.
Decard, read this very carefully – “He has NO proof that voter fraud caused him to lose the election.”
So, he has “every constitutional right” to continue to make an ass of himself by whining like a baby.
He needs to man up and admit that he LOST the election and get on with any future plans he can come up with to help this nation.
I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans.
So, he has “every constitutional right” to continue to make an ass of himself by whining like a baby.
That statement belies your support for Trump.
I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans.
Doubling down on your hatred for Trump - Attaboy!
With all of the evidence - that's right I said EVIDENCE that the Dems STOLE the election, you still deny it.
Add to that the criminal malfeasance by both Biden and his son, and you have a criminal who has no business being within 1000 miles of the white house.
You have no loyalty to Trump asshole. Why in the fuck aren't you posting your bullshit at Democrat Underground instead of fouling this site with your pro-Biden, MSM talking points?
President Donald Trump and other Republicans have filed over 30 lawsuits across six swing states in an attempt to contest the election results.
Most of them have been shot down or withdrawn, and no court has found even a single instance of fraud. Of at least 38 cases to have been filed, including some not directly involving Trump but which could nonetheless affect his standing, at least 26 have been denied, dismissed, settled or withdrawn.
I repeat, NO COURT HAS FOUND EVEN A SINGLE INSTANCE OF FRAUD.
I ask you again, show me the evidence of the fraud you claim – CAN YOU?
