Title: Pennsylvania judge blocks state from certifying election results in presidential and all other races. Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.scribd.com/document/485797248/620-MD-2020-Order-Nov-25 Published:Nov 25, 2020 Author:PA Court Post Date:2020-11-25 12:51:43 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:2778 Comments:27
Despite weeks of extreme rhetoric and failed lawsuits from President Donald Trump, Pennsylvania’s top elections official certified the state’s presidential election results on Tuesday, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner and paving the way for him to receive the state’s 20 Electoral College votes next month.
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar made the final count official three weeks after the Nov. 3 election: Biden received 3,458,229 votes, 80,555 more than President Donald Trump’s 3,377,674 votes. Biden won 50.01% of the vote to 48.8% for Trump.
Gov. Tom Wolf then signed what is called the Certificate of Ascertainment to name the 20 Biden electors who will meet in Harrisburg on Dec. 14 to formally cast the votes for Biden.
Is it true that you didn't watch the video I presented to you?
Trump won everyone knows it.
That is why the election book is missing from Detroit. That is whythey covered up the windows so people couldn't see. That is why they chased poll watchers away. Why are 47 usb drives missing and why did they violate the law and mass mail ballots?
Trump won if you think differently you can go ahead and die. You wouldn't be missed. Well you wouldn't. No one would even know.
The Washington Examiner is a conservative news site and warns Donald Trump: “Concede And Move On.”
It said the president’s legal team “looks as though it is flinging mud to see what sticks” in its bid to overturn the election result.
The Washington Examiner urged President Donald Trump to “move on” and accept defeat in the 2020 election in an editorial published Friday.
The conservative news outlet warned that Trump’s ongoing attempts to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s victory could jeopardize the GOP candidates running for Georgia’s two Senate seats in January runoff elections, and thus cost the Republican Party its control of the Senate.
The site has called out Trump before, but often strikes a friendly tone on the president.
The editorial argues that Trump had the right to legally challenge alleged election “irregularities, mistakes, fraud, or all three,” but that Trump’s legal team has failed to prove the allegations and now “increasingly looks as though it is flinging mud to see what sticks, rather than pursuing a coherent course of litigation.”
The newspaper said Trump’s desperate bid for a second term will fail and is distracting “from the really important task of keeping the Senate in Republican hands.”
“If Trump wishes people to believe he has the good of the country and the legitimacy of its elections in mind, the president should concede that he lost and should do all he can to help his party win the two Senate battles in which it is still engaged,” it concluded.
“If Trump wishes people to believe he has the good of the country and the legitimacy of its elections in mind, the president should concede that he lost and should do all he can to help his party win the two Senate battles in which it is still engaged,” it concluded.
It's not up to the media to decide when Trump concedes. It's up to him.
He has every constitutional right to get to the bottom of voter fraud and Democrat complicity in stealing the election.
If Trump wishes people to believe he has the good of the country and the legitimacy of its elections in mind, the president should concede that he lost and should do all he can to help his party win the two Senate battles in which it is still engaged,” it concluded.
It's not up to the media to decide when Trump concedes. It's up to him.
You are correct when you say, “It's not up to the media to decide when Trump concedes.”
But, the media is not deciding anything – Dipshit. That is merely an “editorial.”
You obviously don’t comprehend what an “editorial” actually is.
So, l et this “ole sage fellow” help you out …
An editorial is a newspaper article written by or on behalf of an editor that gives an opinion on a topical issue.
It’s an “opinion” – and they have a constitutional right to express their opinion. So, clear your mind and realize that they are deciding nothing.
He [Trump] has every constitutional right to get to the bottom of voter fraud and Democrat complicity in stealing the election.
Decard, read this very carefully – “He has NO proof that voter fraud caused him to lose the election.”
So, he has “every constitutional right” to continue to make an ass of himself by whining like a baby.
He needs to man up and admit that he LOST the election and get on with any future plans he can come up with to help this nation.
I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans.
So, he has “every constitutional right” to continue to make an ass of himself by whining like a baby.
That statement belies your support for Trump.
I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans.
Doubling down on your hatred for Trump - Attaboy!
With all of the evidence - that's right I said EVIDENCE that the Dems STOLE the election, you still deny it.
Add to that the criminal malfeasance by both Biden and his son, and you have a criminal who has no business being within 1000 miles of the white house.
You have no loyalty to Trump asshole. Why in the fuck aren't you posting your bullshit at Democrat Underground instead of fouling this site with your pro-Biden, MSM talking points?
So, he has “every constitutional right” to continue to make an ass of himself by whining like a baby. That statement belies your support for Trump.
Wrong – Completely wrong.
That statement has nothing to do with my support of Trump. It is a declaration of fact.
He definitely has the constitutional right to make an ass of himself - Does he not?
And I have the constitutional right to categorize his latest actions as “shining like a baby – Do I not?
Your attempted deflection is thwarted.
It is not my support for Trump that is the nature of these discussions.
It is whether Trump has the evidence to win any of the lawsuits.
We shall see …
I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans.
Doubling down on your hatred for Trump - Attaboy!
Strange that you would see it that way. But then you of course would.
Just to keep up your personal attack on me in lieu of you providing firm evidence that the Dems stole the election.
With all of the evidence - that's right I said EVIDENCE that the Dems STOLE the election, you still deny it.
What evidence – You have provided absolutely NONE.
And let me tell you about the court cases brought by Trump.
There have been nearly two dozen lawsuits since Election Day in an effort to contest the results of the 2020 election. There were lawsuits and motions to intervene in cases in swing states Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania. Out of all of these, there have been zero victories – 19 cases where they've withdrawn or lost, and have 3 cases pending.
If you are a betting person, what odds are you giving that any of the only 3 cases still pending will be successful and change the results of the election?
Add to that the criminal malfeasance by both Biden and his son, and you have a criminal who has no business being within 1000 miles of the white house.
On this, I am in complete agreement. And that is why I say the election was Trumps to lose and Trump lost it.
I repeat, Biden didn’t win the election – Trump gave it to him.
You have no loyalty to Trump asshole.
I have no “blind loyalty” to anyone. Since blind loyalty involves being loyal to a person despite the damage the person does to himself or others. Furthermore, I will never excuse bad behavior in the resolve of protecting allegiance to another – when it was honorable at first, but my silence would be in the form of collusion.
Blind loyalty requires a form of cognitive dissonance wherein someone sees evidence of a problem or bad behavior and then turns a blind eye to the truth in favor of keeping a positive image of the person. That is simply not me. When I know that something is wrong, I will adamantly speak out and not act as if everything is fine.
You need to comprehend that loyalty is only a virtue if the person and – AND – the cause is good.
Why in the fuck aren't you posting your bullshit at Democrat Underground instead of fouling this site with your pro-Biden, MSM talking points?
Because I have the God given privilege and the constitutional right within the parameters of the law to be where I want to be – it is here, that I want to be.
And not – definitely not – where you would like me to be.
