Title: Pennsylvania judge blocks state from certifying election results in presidential and all other races. Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.scribd.com/document/485797248/620-MD-2020-Order-Nov-25 Published:Nov 25, 2020 Author:PA Court Post Date:2020-11-25 12:51:43 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:1563 Comments:27
Despite weeks of extreme rhetoric and failed lawsuits from President Donald Trump, Pennsylvania’s top elections official certified the state’s presidential election results on Tuesday, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner and paving the way for him to receive the state’s 20 Electoral College votes next month.
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar made the final count official three weeks after the Nov. 3 election: Biden received 3,458,229 votes, 80,555 more than President Donald Trump’s 3,377,674 votes. Biden won 50.01% of the vote to 48.8% for Trump.
Gov. Tom Wolf then signed what is called the Certificate of Ascertainment to name the 20 Biden electors who will meet in Harrisburg on Dec. 14 to formally cast the votes for Biden.
Is it true that you didn't watch the video I presented to you?
Trump won everyone knows it.
That is why the election book is missing from Detroit. That is whythey covered up the windows so people couldn't see. That is why they chased poll watchers away. Why are 47 usb drives missing and why did they violate the law and mass mail ballots?
Trump won if you think differently you can go ahead and die. You wouldn't be missed. Well you wouldn't. No one would even know.
Trump won if you think differently you can go ahead and die.
Help me get this straight.
If you cannot either intelligently debate someone, or you cannot show where they are wrong, or you cannot provide facts to support your position and if they “think differently” than you do – then you want them “to die.”
If that “death wish” fails and you still cannot intelligently debate them, or you cannot show where they are wrong, or you cannot provide facts to support your position – you then limit the number of posts they can make, or delete their posts entirely, or prevent them from posting articles, and you will not allow them to use PM.
And if all that fails and they still “think differently” than you – then you BAN them from the forum.
Do I have that right?
So, I have just received another one of the many “death wishes” from you and now time will tell what you will do to me next for being blatantly truthful outspoken and “thinking differently” than you.
I take this opportunity to sincerely wish a Happy Thanksgiving for you and your family.
What you are actually admitting is that “you can’t argue with that.”
Can't argue with that - A phrase used when one cannot or does not want to dispute what another person has said or suggested. Often said in appreciation of the argument or suggestion that has just been presented.
