LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Liz Cheney: Trump should respect ‘the sanctity of our electoral process’
Source:
Geller Report
URL Source: https://gellerreport.com/2020/11/li ... of-our-electoral-process.html/
Published: Nov 24, 2020
Author: Politico Staff
Post Date: 2020-11-24 08:07:19 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 5367
Comments: 54
Many Republicans are predictably abandoning President Trump, even before the legal process is complete. Republicans such as Liz Cheney, Pat Toomey and others need to understand that they are going to pay a big price at the ballot box for betraying President Trump. Just like Fox News has paid a big price in the ratings for betraying President Trump on election night. Liz Cheney exemplifies the Republican Party pre-Trump: weak, cowardly, timid, and disloyal. A party that was incapable of winning national elections. Stay the course, Mr. President. We got your back. “If the President cannot prove these claims or demonstrate that they would change the election result, he should fulfill his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States by respecting the sanctity of our electoral process,” she added minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and others in House leadership have largely backed Trump as he contests the election results and continues to baselessly claim he won the race. Sen. Susan Collins on Friday joined the minority of Republicans willing to speak out against the president, saying that by refusing to concede Trump was denying President-elect Joe Biden access to briefings, office space and government resources he would need in the lead up to his inauguration. Collins also slammed Trump for seeking to “pressure” state election officials working to certify their results, including hosting a delegation of Michigan lawmakers at the White House. “There is a right way and a wrong way to compile the evidence and mount legal challenges in our courts,” the Maine senator said. “The wrong way is to attempt to pressure state election officials. That undermines the public’s faith in our election results without evidence and court rulings to support the allegations.” Yet, the number of congressional Republicans willing to go against Trump or his base remains small. Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn — a staunch Trump ally — backpedaled after referring to Biden as “president-elect” in an interview with ABC News on Friday. Her office later told The Tennessean that she “misspoke.” Poster Comment: How in the hell can any 'conservative' American respect the 'sanctity' of our electoral process when it is so obviously corrupt as to render it null and void? Liz Cheney is a creature crawling out of the swamp unsuccessfully; in fact she's treading water and will sink to her rightful place at the bottom. Most of the Republicrats in Congress enjoy being the party of do-nothings and prefer their minority status. They still get paid and have access to shady deals but get to avoid the spotlight. We know the truth! Biden was plucked out of senility and well-deserved obscurity by the rabid left wingers who saw him as the vehicle by which they could gain the White House. This duped senile is a member of the filthy swamp who will completely lose his mind to Alzheimer within months.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#5. To: IbJensen, All (#0)
Any “’conservative’ American” who makes such a bold seemingly undeniable statement that “our electoral process is so obviously corrupt as to render it null and void” should be able to back up his emphatic declarative statement with facts. Can you do that in light of the fact that … Most of them have been shot down or withdrawn, and no court has found even a single instance of fraud. Of at least 38 cases to have been filed, including some not directly involving Trump but which could nonetheless affect his standing, at least 26 have been denied, dismissed, settled or withdrawn. Repeat: NO COURT HAS FOUND EVEN A SINGLE INSTANCE OF FRAUD. … if so, then it will be no problem for you to share with us your factual documentation to show that our “electoral process is so obviously corrupt.” Can you do that?
Facts? Facts? Don't need no facts, Gatlin. I will now operate the way the crazy rights operate.
It is blatantly obvious that you have absolutely no need for facts. So, what is it that you do in the absence of facts? Just make up shit and post whatever comes to your mind – hoping that some other idiot will give credence to what you are posting.
In your case I'll call you MR. IDIOT! There's all the proof in the world, but you, being a dyed in the wool Sheeple, wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in your ass!
Of all the GOP and Trump campaign’s allegations of election irregularities in six states. So far, not one has been proved. But you have “all the proof in the world.” Then for heaven’s sake – get in touch with someone in Trump’s campaign and share this proof you have with them so that we can see Trump remain in office for another 4 years.
There is lots of proof. It has been posted. If you continue to lie and say there is no proof I will ban you. If you say it is your opinion there isn't enough proof then that could be considered truthful. I would not ban you in that case. You know there are some problems and fraud. So be honest. If you don't like that here is a site with fools of your Ilk www.dailykos.com. wou would fit in nicely there if you are unable to acknowledge the truth.
#27. To: A K A Stone (#25)
Don't ban the clown. Let him continue to make an ass of himself.
Do you mean lots of proof like you posted here: Stone, that was no proof. I showed you why and I posted a link explaining exactly what happened and why the law requited it to protect the right of the voters. I will now post you other links to show you that what you perceived as proof was actually no proof at all: I hawk these threads even more that Deckard does and I have seen everything you say is lot of proof posted. All I have seen is what people are posting, like you did with the picure, that “they call proof.” They see what they want to believe. And when they see anything they can “perceive as proof” their minds are preprogrammed to say, “Ah Ha – There’s the proof.” Stone, that is exactly what you did when you posted the picture of the windows being covered, isn’t it? Of course, it is. You saw the picture and you thought Gatlin wants proof – so this picture will show him proof. Trump's election fight includes over 40 lawsuits. It's not going well. "Calling an election unfair does not make it so," one ruling said. Most of them have been shot down or withdrawn, and no court has found even a single instance of fraud. Of at least 41 cases to have been filed, including some not directly involving Trump but which could nonetheless affect his standing, at least 26 have been denied, dismissed, settled or withdrawn. Stone, please read this very carefully: “No court has found even a single instance of fraud.” So, if is is as you say, that – there is lots of proof. It has been posted – then you need to get that posted evidence to Trump’ legal team pronto because they are flat out getting their legal asses kicked to hell and back even in courts with Trump appointed judges. I don’t lie – I never have and I never will lie. If that is all you can do since you can provide no factual proof, then do it now and get over. I gave 24 years to the service of our great nation for our right to freely speak our minds. I was fully prepared to give my life for that and the other constitutional right we have – some of my best friends did. If censorship is your only course of action because you cannot furnish proof and all you can say is that is has been posed – then I say again, do the ban now. Is this where I am supposed to say, “yessir, yessir mister boss man – ah do.” Well, I wlll not and I say that I will stand firmly with the 20 or more court decisions and say that “no proof of fraud” has been shown. That is not an “opinion.” That is a statement of fact. And I will never kowtow {borrowed from kau tau in Cantonese Chinese] to you or anyone else who denies the truth and denies access to it. I know nothing of the kind. I have read that there are some problems. And I have read about alleged fraud. I do believe the problems because they have been proven. But not one of the fraud charges has been proven – anywhere. No, thank you – I find plenty of ilk here and I see no reason to leave just to try to find groupies to surround myself with that agree with me and I agree with them – like you are doing. I believe one can be a staunch conservative and disagree with other conservatives while challenging those other conservatives to provide proof of the allegations. What – if anything – is wrong with that? You said to me once before in another of your threats, if you don’t agree with me, I will ban you. Yes you did, and you know damned well I will take time to find hat quote if you challenge it. Stone, that is wrong – It is wrong for all you want on the forum are those who agree with you. I am fully capable of acknowledging the truth. But I will never acknowledge some perception you call the truth – like you did with that nefarious picture you posed. I will continue my search for the truth and challenge those who try to pass off their perceptions as the gospel truth. I can handle that. If you can’t handle my search for truth – then proceed with the threatened banning …
It just keeps coming, Stone – It just keeps on coming. <> The Third Circuit stated yesterday in their opinion: So, you are going to kick my ass off of your forum because I am asking to be shown evidence of fraud when Trump’s expert legal team cannot even show any court evidence of fraud. Yet you state: You are not a fair, reasonable and rational person, Stone. Why not? It just keeps coming, Stone – It just keeps on coming. At what point will you accept reality - Or is it that you never will. I say that it will be the later - Unfortunaely.
I went to Kos since I have never been there. I saw nothing I liked. But you did peak my interest and the next thing I saw was Their format is – Oh Ny God – superb. Just, WOW … Go take a look. No, I don’t want to go there either – I’d rather stay with the ilk here. Yu will never have that many members with that much participation, but you definitely could have an equally terrific formatted site and a goodly limited number of active participations – If only you wanted to. Edit:
Okay, Stone – Do I continue to post here, or am I banned? I am ready for your call – AIM STRAIGHT, Please ... .
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Poster Comment:
How in the hell can any 'conservative' American respect the 'sanctity' of our electoral process when it is so obviously corrupt as to render it null and void? President Donald Trump and other Republicans have filed over 30 lawsuits across six swing states in an attempt to contest the election results.
#6. To: Gatlin (#5)
#7. To: IbJensen, All (#6)
Facts? Facts? Don't need no facts, Gatlin.
#21. To: Gatlin (#7)
hoping that some other idiot will give credence to what you are posting.
#24. To: IbJensen (#21)
There's all the proof in the world …
#25. To: Gatlin (#24)
Replies to Comment # 25. There is lots of proof. It has been posted. If you continue to lie and say there is no proof I will ban you.
#28. To: A K A Stone. All (#25)
There is lots of proof. It has been posted. 
If you continue to lie and say there is no proof I will ban you. If you say it is your opinion there isn't enough proof then that could be considered truthful. I would not ban you in that case. You know there are some problems and fraud. If you don't like that here is a site with fools of your Ilk www.dailykos.com. wou would fit in nicely there … … if you are unable to acknowledge the truth.
#33. To: A K A Stone, All (#25)
(Edited)
… the federal appeals court makes plain the finding that the president’s repeated claims of fraud are not supported by evidence. There is lots of proof [of fraud]. It has been posted.
#34. To: A K A Stone (#25)
(Edited)
If you don't like that here is a site with fools of your Ilk www.dailykos.com. Conservative Political Forum. 429213 Posts in 36682 Topics by 2573 Members.
Most Online Today: 262. Most Online Ever: 4719,
You will never guess who I saw posting over there.
It was: WWG1WGA
.
#35. To: A K A Stone (#25)
(Edited)
… I will ban you. 
End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]