United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Video Analysis Proves Kyle Rittenhouse Did Not Shoot First
Source:
Summit News
URL Source: https://summit.news/2020/08/27/vide ... ttenhouse-did-not-shoot-first/
Published: Aug 27, 2020
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2020-08-27 15:29:41 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 6711
Comments: 49
New video analysis of the incident in Kenosha during which two people were shot dead proves that Kyle Rittenhouse did not shoot first and acted in self-defense. Rittenhouse shot three rioters during the confrontation, killing two, one of whom was a convicted pedophile and on the Wisconsin sex offenders registry. Video footage and images from the incident show how Rittenhouse was being pursued and physically attacked before firing any shots. One of the individuals he shot was carrying a handgun, while another tried to hit him over the head with a skateboard and another aimed a kick at his head as he lay on the ground. Now new analysis of footage that preceded Rittenhouse discharging his AR-15 by New York Times Visual Investigations journalist Christiaan Triebert shows that the 17-year-old did not shoot first. “At 23:19, Rittenhouse is seen in this YouTube livestream. He’s being chased into a parking lot. While he is being pursued, an unknown gunman fires the first shot into the air,” tweeted Triebert. The muzzle flash of the first shot can also be seen in the video from a different angle. Rittenhouse has been charged with 1st degree murder, presumably to satiate the Black Lives Matter mob, but all the evidence clearly shows he acted in self-defense. One wonders if the media will acknowledge that there were at least two gunmen involved in the confrontation and that the one pursuing Rittenhouse fired his weapon first. Don’t hold your breath.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.
#1. To: Deckard, misterwhite (#0)
I have my doubts the guy shot in the head was struck by fire from an AR-15 at close range. When the guy who took off his shirt was asked to apply pressure to control the bleeding, he asked where the down guy was wounded, and was told in the head. It seems like the bullet entered and did not exit. An AR-15 would have exited and likely left a large hole behind. The down guy may have been a victim of off-target "friendly" handgun fire. Maybe they will retrieve a bullet out of his head.
I agree. But when I first saw the video, for some reason I thought the head wound looked like a glancing blow. Not a lot of blood and he was responsive. The shooter fired what sounded like four shots. Perhaps he was also hit elsewhere?
I really could not see enough in a blurred image to determine what or where the head wound was. I did not observe much blood, making multiple wounds less likely. A glancing blow was less likely to cause quick death. What struck me was the audio when the shirt guy looked at the down body and had to ask where the wound was. It was not immediately obvious and there was no big puddle. A less forceful bullet could have entered and left a small entry hole, and then ricocheted around inside until all kinetic energy was expended, putting the brain through a blender. In that case, he could have bled to death internally with the blood just pooling inside. I just did not see enough to justify the news accounts that Rittenhouse shot the guy in the head and it has been nagging at me.
Anomalies... Head wound Harry...has legs crossed in the comfort position, his wound is shown through a nifty round hole much larger than the wound itself, and even though there is no blood whatsoever, a girl decides to stop the bleeding with a nasty piece of fabric. The shoot out...Kyle's AR is way too quite (compare to sounds made at the beginning of the video). AR's are extremely loud. And I see no muzzle flashes. None. Skateboard dude doesn't even get shot but stumbles off and falls down. White pants guy takes a round, starts hobbling, then runs off without the limp. Pistol guy gets hit by a weird air blast with no wound immediately visible. He never drops his pistol. His arm wound, later cameo'd for the camera, would have bled him out in mere seconds. Such wounds are available online...store.techlinetech http://nologiesinc.com/ Then Kyle runs toward the cops! Half the time his hands are on the AR! (Never run toward cops while carrying a gun!) I was expecting him to get shot to hell but no, the cops wave him on through (as they approach an active shooting...say what). Analysis: faker than the George Floyd/Geo Flood (Days of Noah) mess in Minneapolis. Just my opinion, based on what I observe in the video, made by the silent, unflinching videographer, who showed no fear of a crazed white supremist shooting people with an evil white supremist AR just 20 feet away.
So he knew ahead of time that a shot was going to go off near his arm and pre-purchased a fake arm wound which he applied while running away being recorded. Does that fake wound also remove muscle tissue?
Does that fake wound also remove muscle tissue? The wound looks pretty convincing, however, so do the wounds you find for sale on the internet. Having fake wounds on hand for a hoax would be expected. Several things don't look right: When Pistol Guy takes the round, there is no blood spray, nor do I see a wound open up at the time of impact. He holds on to his pistol even though shot thru the muscles, nerves, and the major artery in the arm. Where doctors take vital signs there is are a huge, powerful, and loud artery. If you've ever take vitals you'd know what I'm referring to. Look at that picture. You trying to tell me that the bullet missed the artery? I watched my classmate bleed to death from a wound much less severe than the one pictured. There's a big chunk of video missing between Kyle's contact with police and the scene with Pistol Guy and his wound. When we see Pistol Guy again he's returned to the middle of the street and sitting down with a tourniquet. Instinct would tell a wounded man to find safety, a place away from the shooting. Then, without even examining the victim, the police just stand him up and walk him away. Why? Considering there was a dead guy just a few feet away who might still be alive and needing assistance. Secure the crime scene? Nah. And we still haven't resolved the total lack of report from the AR, or the absence of muzzle flash. I will say this: if the shooting is legit then Kyle did an outstanding job of defending himself. Not to mention granting an interview with the media just before the shooting and a nice photo bomb with Trump in 2016.
You really believe that it was fake? :(
I'm on the fence. The head wound looks suspicious. The arm wound looks very real, but to miss that artery...virtually impossible. Misterwhite is correct about the flash suppression, but the gunshots from the AR sound completely bogus to me, especially the first shot he made on white pants guy. Paul wrote: "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good". Something that Christians seldom do: examine everything carefully, look deeply into it, turn it over and study it from all sides...which does require a healthy dose of skepticism.
There are no replies to Comment # 16. End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Rittenhouse shot three rioters during the confrontation, killing two
#2. To: nolu chan (#1)
An AR-15 would have exited and likely left a large hole behind.
#3. To: misterwhite (#2)
#5. To: nolu chan (#3)
...it has been nagging at me
#7. To: watchman (#5)
Such wounds are available online.
#8. To: misterwhite (#7)
o he knew ahead of time that a shot was going to go off near his arm and pre-purchased a fake arm wound which he applied while running away being recorded.
#15. To: watchman (#8)
Having fake wounds on hand for a hoax would be expected.
#16. To: A K A Stone (#15)
Replies to Comment # 16.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]