[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Biden won’t stop them, and neither will cops, until Portland is burned down

SALUTE THE MARINE!!!!!

Trump's greatest legacy: The GOP now represents America's workers

Joe’s ... firsT 17 AcTs --- Of DesTructTon

google is evil

Now wiTh The UniTed StaTes Taken ouT --- They have a glide paTh To “build iT back beTTer” / “susTainabiliTy” / “social justTce” us --- inTo “The GreaT ReseT

DAY ONE: Beijing Biden Kills Keystone Pipeline and Thousands of Jobs, Rejoins Paris Climate Accord, Removed 1776 Project, Vows to Restart Iran’s Nuclear Program, Fed Mask Mandates

Republicans Block Swift Approval of Biden's DHS Pick

President Donald J. Trump Departure Ceremony

Stop the Steal

Feds ArresT Pennsylvania Woman ... Accused of STealing --- Pelosi’s LapTop

Enter the Dumbest Administration on Earth

How Joe Biden Will Open The Floodgates To Transgendering Public Schools

CNN Pushes to Close Down Newsmax TV

tax and regulate

Supreme CourT Deals DemocraTs A Major DefeaT In Texas ... They JusT Ruled ---To RejecT Universal Mail-In BalloTing

EYEWITNESS' ACCOUNT DC

Biden’s party seeks to divide and destroy, not unite and heal

“If You Need All This To Protect Your Inauguration from the People, Maybe the F-ing People Didn’t F-ing Elect You!” – DC Worker Shows Video of Military Checkpoints in City (VIDEO)

Illegal crossing

How Soon Will the Social Security Trust Fund Be Depleted and How Should People Protect Their Retirement Income?

With These Figures, It's No Shock Why Republicans Got Swept by Democrats in Georgia

Domestic Terrorist?" - Leftist BLM Activist Who Stormed Capitol On Jan. 6 Arrested, Charged - John Earle Sullivan

The Republican Party Killed Itself

Australia to kill pigeon that crossed Pacific from Oregon

communism

Could Joe Biden face impeachment?

Democrats Are Using The Recent Capitol Riot To Consolidate Power

Hold Twitter To Account

Incitement, Insurrection, Impeachment, Imperiousness, and Idiocy

Dems want to bring down anyone who ever backed Trump: Goodwin

Uganda Bans Twitter

Big Corporate Uses Capitol Riots To Push Communist-Style Social Credit System On Americans

Worst people on planet

Gluttons for boot news.

THE MAN ... WHO SHOT ASHLI BABBITT --- (WAS HE BLACK?)

impeachment

Big Tech’s War on Free Speech

GOP Can't Afford to Leave Trump's Voters Behind

North Idaho Internet Provider Blocks Facebook, Twitter on Its Service Over Censorship

ACLU warns of ‘unchecked power’ of big tech for banning Trump amid calls for investigation of Amazon, Google and Apple

Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney explained Everything TACTICAL DECEPTION, THE STING, THE DATA

POPE DISAPPEARS INTO THIN AIR.

Pelosi And Wimp Portland Mayor Wheeler Conspired And Planned To Blame The Riots On Trump...Nutty Nancy Urges Limp-Wristed Wheeler To Stick To The 'Democrat (Communist) 'Play Book' - Is Nancy's Laptop Starting To Leak?

Parlar

The Most Trusted Voice In America

Pelosi

MAGA forever

Photos & Videos: BLM Activist John Sullivan Who Stormed The US Capitol Says That The Secret Has Been In Contact With Him - Far-Left Activists Have Raised Suspicion That He Is A Federal Agent Provocateur

US Attorney launches federal excessive force investigation into death of Trump-supporting Air Force vet who was shot dead as rioters breached the Capitol


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Federal Legislators Pitching Massive Police Reform Bill That Would End Qualified Immunity
Source: Tech Dirt
URL Source: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2 ... d-end-qualified-immunity.shtml
Published: Jun 11, 2020
Author: Tim Cushing
Post Date: 2020-06-11 19:35:24 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 229
Comments: 5

from the lots-of-things-cops-won't-like,-all-in-one-place dept

There's some national-level police reform on the way, courtesy of Democratic lawmakers. Unfortunately, it's going up against a party that holds a majority in the Senate and has pledged an oath of fealty to our very pro-cop president. This will make it difficult to pass in its unaltered form. And that's even if it's given a chance to come up for a vote when it hits the Senate, considering the Senate Majority Leader's antipathy towards legislation he doesn't agree with.

That being said, the bill should still be discussed. There's a non-zero chance it will eventually make its way to a president's desk. Possibly not this one's, but there's an election in November.

The Justice in Policing Act of 2020 [PDF] addresses a number of issues that have turned our nation's law enforcement agencies into the paragons of unaccountability currently being protested en masse around the nation. The first stop is officers' legal defenses when sued or prosecuted for violating rights.

There are two parts to this equation and the first is what prosecutors must prove when charging cops with criminal acts. This bill lowers the standard, making it a bit easier for prosecutors to get charges to stick. From the fact sheet [PDF]:

Makes it easier to prosecute offending officers by amending the federal criminal statute to prosecute police misconduct. The mens rea requirement in 18 U.S.C. Section 242 will be amended from “willfulness” to a “recklessness” standard.

The bigger change is one that attacks the Supreme Court's "qualified immunity" construct. There's no law to amend here because there was never any law created to grant police officers this extra right. If this bill becomes law, qualified immunity will cease to exist. The bill refers to 42 USC 1983, which is what gives citizens the right to sue officers for violating their rights. Nothing in that law says anything about qualified immunity.

This bill would add something to the law removing the qualified immunity defense constructed by the Supreme Court.

‘‘It shall not be a defense or immunity to any action brought under this section against a local law enforcement officer (as defined in section 2 of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020) or a State correctional officer (as defined in section 1121(b) of title 18, United States 22 Code) that—

‘‘(1) the defendant was acting in good faith, or that the defendant believed, reasonably or otherwise, that his or her conduct was lawful at the time when the conduct was committed; or

‘‘(2) the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws were not clearly established at the time of their deprivation by the defendant, or that at this time, the state of the law was otherwise such that the defendant could not reasonably have been expected to know whether his or her conduct was lawful."

Officers will still be able to argue these things, but they won't be able to move for summary judgment just by saying a couple of magic words. They'll actually have to submit counterarguments and evidence if they hope to avoid losing a civil rights lawsuit.

Unfortunately, this won't apply to federal law enforcement officers, who have mysteriously been given a carve-out by this bill. But it will be a good start if it sticks. Taking away officers' "GET OUT OF LAWSUIT FREE" cards should have an impressive deterrent effect. Being able to prove your actions were justified is far more difficult than simply claiming any "reasonable" officer would have made the same decision under the circumstances.

There are other good reforms in there as well, although the elimination of qualified immunity is clearly the headliner.

The bill would ban chokeholds and carotid holds by federal law enforcement and make federal grants to state and local police dependent on their banning of these restraint methods. It also bans the use of no-knock warrants by federal agents and similarly restricts the distribution of federal funds to local cops who still engage in this practice.

The bill also mandates more training for cops, in hopes of reducing biased or racist policing, and makes de-escalation tactics a requirement in tense situations, rather than the usual hail of bullets in response to any "quickly evolving" interaction. It gives the DOJ more power to conduct investigations of local law enforcement agencies and establishes funding for state Attorney General investigations of problematic police departments.

The bill would also significantly modify the 1033 program, which has turned a lot of police departments into military outfits by showering them with military vehicles, guns, aircraft, and clothing. The bill would ban the transfer of armored vehicles, grenades/launchers, aircraft with "no established commercial flight application," silencers, and long-range acoustic devices.

Another (theoretically) helpful aspect of the bill is the camera mandate. Most federal officers do not wear body cameras and often ask locals to remove theirs when participating in joint operations. That will no longer be standard practice. The bill mandates use of body cameras by all federal officers and for all marked federal police vehicles to have dashcams.

It's a comprehensive set of reforms and it's going to be greeted by loud opposition from all levels of law enforcement. But that's okay. The louder they yell, the more we know this is the right direction to go. If officers are ever going to start acting like anyone else but them matters, it will take more than tepid half-efforts. Destroying the judicially-created concept of "qualified immunity" should have an immediate effect. Raising the bar for officers to escape civil rights lawsuits has huge deterrent potential. Eliminating some of the worst patterns and practices (dressing up like soldiers, using no-knock warrants, etc.) should disrupt the "soldiers in a war zone" mindset that has contributed to ongoing violence against citizens even as crime levels and killings of police officers remain at historic lows.

The bill has a lot going for it at the moment. There's plenty of public support for reform right now. Unfortunately, the bill's opponents have shown a preference for coddling the most powerful man in the world rather than listening to their constituents. If the bill's momentum stalls, it may take another horrific flash point to reignite its fire.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard, Tom McClintock -R Calif., Great American RINO (#0)

www.congress.gov/bill/116.../house-bill/7085?r=62&s=1

H.R.7085 - To amend the Revised Statutes to remove the defense of qualified immunity in the case of any action under section 1979, and for other purposes.116th Congress (2019-2020) | Get alerts

Sponsor: Rep. Amash, Justin [L-MI-3] (Introduced 06/04/2020)
Committees: House - Judiciary
Latest Action: House - 06/04/2020 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (All Actions)

Cosponsors (39)

* = Original cosponsor

Cosponsor Date Cosponsored

Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5]* 06/04/2020
Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Garcia, Jesus G. "Chuy" [D-IL-4]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3]* 06/04/2020
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Kennedy, Joseph P., III [D-MA-4]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-13] 06/08/2020
Rep. Sherrill, Mikie [D-NJ-11] 06/08/2020
Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9] 06/08/2020
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11] 06/08/2020
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] 06/08/2020
Rep. Grijalva, Raul M. [D-AZ-3] 06/08/2020
Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1] 06/08/2020
Rep. Trahan, Lori [D-MA-3] 06/08/2020
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] 06/08/2020
Rep. Clay, Wm. Lacy [D-MO-1] 06/08/2020
Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7] 06/08/2020
Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4] 06/08/2020
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3] 06/08/2020
Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9] 06/08/2020
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12] 06/08/2020
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2] 06/08/2020
Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1] 06/08/2020
Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18] 06/08/2020
Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5] 06/08/2020
Rep. McEachin, A. Donald [D-VA-4] 06/08/2020
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9] 06/08/2020
Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12] 06/08/2020


BREAKING UPDATE:

With 1 Republican Cosponsor, Rep. Justin Amash Gains Tripartisan Support To End Qualified Immunity

Rep. Tom McClintock (R–Calif.) announced he will support the Ending Qualified Immunity Act.



Ron Paul - Lake Jackson Texas Values

Hondo68  posted on  2020-06-11   22:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

They'll actually have to submit counterarguments and evidence if they hope to avoid losing a civil rights lawsuit.

In other words, they'll have to prove their innocence.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-06-12   11:15:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

18 U.S.C. Section 242 will be amended from “willfulness” to a “recklessness” standard.

Uh-huh. This means in the George Floyd case the cops should have assumed he had a heart condition and was under the influence of methamphetamine, cocaine and pot. Otherwise they're "acting recklessly".

misterwhite  posted on  2020-06-12   11:19:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Deckard (#0)

Good law. Perhaps there are aspects that could be improved. Republican complaints about the bill aren't good enough, though. If the Republicans don't want to lose on this issue, they have to take the lead by proposing their OWN set of reforms, and they need to be as real and have as much teeth in them as these Democratic proposals. If the Republicans simply abdicate the field, the Democrats will dominate the issue, and if there's no reform because Trump blocks it, when the next crop of civilians are killed by the cops, the Republicans will suffer the blowback. Folding their arms and trying to uphold the status quo, without change, will get the Republicans killed politically this year.

Vicomte13  posted on  2020-06-12   18:36:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Deckard (#0)

No word on civil asset forfeiture. I guess it's not violent enough of an abuse to warrant attention.

But it's certainly a big move in the right direction.

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-06-12   23:39:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com