Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles
Title: What Is “Presuppositional” Apologetics?
Source:
Answers In Genesis
URL Source: http://www.answersingenesis.org/art ... 4/presuppositional-apologetics
Published: Feb 9, 2010
Author: David Wright
Post Date: 2010-02-09 18:16:36 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 4738
Comments: 15
When explaining their beliefs, Christians often feel they must first prove the Bible or prove the existence of God. This approach reveals that they do not yet understand the Bible’s approach, known as presuppositional apologetics. Presuppositions are simply beliefs that everyone has that affect how they think, view the world, interpret evidence, and read the Bible. Apologetics is a reasoned defense of beliefs. So presuppositional apologetics is a reasoned defense of Christian beliefs based on recognizing our presuppositions. For instance, my presupposition is that God exists and He has given us His Word (the Bible) that is absolute truth. So I use the Bible as the basis for how to think, interpret evidence, explain the world around me, and read the Bible. An atheist’s presupposition will most likely be that there is no God and that truth is relative. An atheist believes that man decides truth, and so he thinks, interprets evidence, and views the world and Bible accordingly. If we start off believing the Bible is the Word of God (2 Timothy 3:16; Psalm 18:30; Proverbs 30:5), then we use it as our axiom. An axiom (often used in logic) is a proposition that is not susceptible to proof or disproof; its truth is assumed. The Bible takes this stance, assuming God’s existence to be true and not something to be proven (Genesis 1:1; Exodus 3:14; Revelation 1:8). The battle is not over evidence but over philosophical starting points: presuppositions. As Christians, we should never put away our axiom—the Bible—when discussing truth with others. This would be like a soldier going into battle without any armor or weapons. Asking a Christian to abandon the Bible for the sake of discussion is like asking an atheist to prove there is no God by using only the Bible. You would be asking the atheist to give up his axiom. The prophets and the apostles never tried to prove God’s existence. They started by assuming God’s existence, and they always reasoned from Scripture (Acts 17:2, 17; 18:4, 19). By using the Word of God, we are actually pitting the unbeliever against God and not our own fallible thinking.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
In philosophy, when the presupposition is not based upon observation but of faith, using the basis of the faith as proof of its existence is called "Circular reasoning" and thus fallacious...
Kind of like the atheist who pre supposes there is no God. Except that there is revelation in the Bible of Gods word. Something you can test and see if it is worthwhile knowledge.
What I don't understand is why God's word is so incredibly difficult to understand. Since the assumption is that God can do anything, why couldn't he make himself clear? Instead we end up with hundreds or thousands of different sects all proclaiming to be the only ones who are following God's way. If I were God, I would have burned my word permanently into the side of a mountain in such a way that all could understand it with no translation necessary. After all, God can do anything, so this would have been child's play to him.
Please God, let Alabama beat Kentucky on Kentucky's home court tonight. This is an experiment. And don't tell my neighbors...they're all Kentucky fans.
What we need to settle this is a three way match between the believers in God, Jesus, and Allah.
HEY LLAMA!!! HOW ABOUT A LITTLE SOMETHING FOR THE EFFORT?!?
There are no replies to Comment # 15. End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: war (#1)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#2)
Except that there is revelation in the Bible of Gods word.
#11. To: Skip Intro (#10)
After all, God can do anything, so this would have been child's play to him.
#12. To: Fred Mertz (#11)
This is an experiment.
#15. To: Skip Intro (#12)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 15.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]