[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: SOMEONES OPINION: What Does Free Speech Mean?
Source: www.uscourts.gov
URL Source: https://www.uscourts.gov/about-fede ... h/activity-resources/what-does
Published: Apr 19, 2020
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2020-04-19 08:00:45 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 1464
Comments: 9

What Does Free Speech Mean?

Among other cherished values, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech. The U.S. Supreme Court often has struggled to determine what exactly constitutes protected speech. The following are examples of speech, both direct (words) and symbolic (actions), that the Court has decided are either entitled to First Amendment protections, or not.

Freedom of speech includes the right:

  • Not to speak (specifically, the right not to salute the flag). West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).

  • Of students to wear black armbands to school to protest a war (“Students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.”). Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).

  • To use certain offensive words and phrases to convey political messages. Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971).

  • To contribute money (under certain circumstances) to political campaigns. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).

  • To advertise commercial products and professional services (with some restrictions). Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976); Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977).

  • To engage in symbolic speech, (e.g., burning the flag in protest). Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989); United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990).
Freedom of speech does not include the right:
  • To incite actions that would harm others (e.g., “[S]hout[ing] ‘fire’ in a crowded theater.”). Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).

  • To make or distribute obscene materials. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).

  • To burn draft cards as an anti-war protest. United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968).

  • To permit students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).

  • Of students to make an obscene speech at a school-sponsored event. Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).

  • Of students to advocate illegal drug use at a school-sponsored event. Morse v. Frederick, __ U.S. __ (2007).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#1. To: Gatlin (#0) (Edited)

One thing to keep in mind when looking at free speech -- up until 1925, free speech was protected only from federal interference. State and local governments were free to prohibit speech (and many did) assuming their state constitutions allowed them to do so. This is called a "federal republic". Which we were.

But that's too messy for the liberals who desire a one-size- fits-all government. So, rather than trying to lobby 50 states to pass restrictive laws, they only have to lobby the federal government.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-04-19   9:34:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite (#1) (Edited)

One thing to keep in mind when looking at free speech -- up until 1925, free speech was protected only from federal interference. State and local governments were free to prohibit speech (and many did) assuming their state constitutions allowed them to do so. This is called a "federal republic". Which we were.

Which states didn't or don't have freedom of speech and assembly in their constitutions?

Also the 14th amendment although illegitimately passed. Is recognized as legitimate. So how did they get around that in 1924? It would have been a violation.

A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-19   9:52:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Which states didn't or don't have freedom of speech and assembly in their constitutions?

New York, for one. That's where Mr. Gitlow filed his suit in 1925.

Gitlow was convicted under New York’s Criminal Anarchy Law, which punished advocating the overthrow of the government by force. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the 14th amendment applied to the states and that Gitlow's actions were insignificant.

What's funny is that his actions would probably be punishable today, even with first amendment protection.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-04-19 10:28:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-19 10:34:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Also the 14th amendment although illegitimately passed. Is recognized as legitimate. So how did they get around that in 1924? It would have been a violation.

The 14th amendment was adopted in 1868. At the time, no one paid any attention to the due process portion. Even years after the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court in United States v. Cruikshank (1876) still held that the First and Second Amendment did not apply to state governments.

Over the years (and starting with Gitlow in 1925), the U.S. Supreme Court used the due process clause to "selectively incorporate" the Bill of Rights and apply their protections to the states.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-04-19 11:19:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com