International News
See other International News Articles
Title: CBC Instructs Kids on How to Shut Down Their Parents’ “Conspiracy Theories”
Source:
Summit News
URL Source: https://summit.news/2020/04/16/cbc- ... r-parents-conspiracy-theories/
Published: Apr 16, 2020
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2020-04-17 20:35:21 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 415
Comments: 3
A CBC News report gives kids advice on how to shut down “conspiracy theories” voiced by their parents about coronavirus being created by China in a lab. Because apparently that’s the media’s job now. The presenter laments how somebody’s Dad may drop a message into chat blaming China for “manufacturing the coronavirus” with a “link to a site you’ve never heard of” (translation – a link that’s not, God forbid, mainstream media). The piece then features a woman from a group that combats “misinformation online” who urges the son or daughter not to get confrontational with their Dad but to accuse him of being accurate and stirring fear. Is uncle Bob spreading COVID-19 misinformation in the family group chat? This doesn't have to be awkward. pic.twitter.com/SxX5HVqY9a — CBC News: The National (@CBCTheNational) April 15, 2020 At one point in the piece, the reporter even suggests that conspiracy theories can be “just as dangerous as a virus.” “Maybe send an article from a legitimate source quoting credible scientists on why the virus wasn’t manufactured,” states the host. The suggested article unsurprisingly comes from the CBC and is entitled ‘No, the new coronavirus wasn’t created in a lab, scientists say.’ In reality, as Fox News sources confirmed last night, the coronavirus was indeed leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, so to say it was “manufactured” isn’t even much of a stretch. The virus was literally created in a lab. The irony of all this of course is that virtually nobody trusts the mainstream media, so when they attack conspiracy theories it just makes more people believe them. When social media giants then get involved to censor information about the same conspiracy theories, that also bolsters the notion that they’re accurate because powerful interests are trying to stifle them. Take the news report below as an example. A reporter who adopts a stereotypical fake ‘news reporter’ accent which normal people don’t use when they talk to each other tells the viewer that the conspiracy theory linking 5G to coronavirus is false. A doctor wearing a white lab coat inside what appears to be his own home (to stress faux authority) is then presented to call the conspiracy “completely false.” The doctor doesn’t even explain why it’s false (he could have pointed out for example that Iran was impacted by coronavirus yet has no 5G network at all), but the news station just expects the viewer to believe him because he’s an authority figure in uniform. In reality, as the comments below the video prove, the vast majority of people see the news report as desperate and hokey, making them believe the conspiracy theory to an even greater degree.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
On it's face, I can see no logic to the argument that 5G could be linked to the corona-virus. The serious potential problem I DO see with 5G is killing birds and bees that come near the towers, as some YT vids purport to document. And the problem with far fetched theories linking 5G to the virus is they get ridiculed out the wazoo, which then sets up, in the public eye, the presumtion that any other theories about 5G being very damaging being outlandish as well. So because of the 5G-virus theory, the 5G-bird killing theory, which is no way outlandish, won't see the light of day. The public perception will be set: Anyone who thinks 5G is anything but a divine gift from God will be considered a kook. That is the real problem with circulating far fetched theories.
The link is indirect; It's powerful microwaves cause serious cellular damage. 5G is only one of the countless big lies and poison pills unleashed on a naive citizenry designed to depopulate this world for the Occultists-Ghoul 1%'ers. The serious potential problem I DO see with 5G is killing birds and bees that come near the towers, as some YT vids purport to do. Given your Birds/Bees death-toll theory (which I also believe is legit), why wouldn't the same damaging microwave energy also cause humans serious DNA and cellular havoc? Btw, did you know Bill Gates is curiously said to banish his own children from using wifi-controled computer tablets? So because of the 5G-virus theory, the 5G-bird killing theory, which is no way outlandish, won't see the light of day. The public perception will be set: Anyone who thinks 5G is anything but a divine gift from God will be considered a kook. Don't kid yourself; MANY people already know the dangers of 5G. The truth is hemmoraging out there It's way too late for that "Rat-out-Mommy & Daddy" declaration. The MAIN thrust of this story is on planting the seeds for reporting parents over the dissemination of "CT"s over the 5G truth as well as all other actual truth. The simplest way to determine truth, and especially the kind of truth that exposes the PTB as liars, assassins, and sociopaths is...noting exactly which subjects or "CT"s they deem most "dangerous." THAT subject will relegate the "Truther" to "Kook" status. It is exactly why G00gle considers its most "dangerous" subjects as "Flat Earth, "911," "Chemtrails," "Moon Landing," PizzaGate, and any number of obvious FF ops. They are attempting to bake-in ostracizing and "kook!" status. That is the real problem with circulating far fetched theories. You've got this azz-backwards. Problem for who? (besides for liars and sociopaths? Those who fear being ostracized?) Who determines what is a "far fetched theory"? And why? Could it be those PTB and occultists who adjudicate the laws? Control schools? Universities? Legislatures? Institutions? Should we just dismiss and ignore our own eyes, ears, logic and common sense? Those PTB whose system has been rigged and aces in the hole hidden have everything the lose and at stake. That is why this world at this moment is experiencing a Hidden War.
It would, which is a stronger concern than it killing the birds and bees directly, as bad as that in itself is. But if it caused that kind of damage, we'd certainly see it manifest in more ways than simply making people more prone to one particular virus. If "many" means < 1%, which could be 10's of millions of people, that's not nearly enough. It would take a double digit percentage to make a difference, and to my point, outlandish theories help ensure it stays under 1%, because people are easily manipulated into dismissing legit info. The average person decides that. And feeding them info that, true or not, is easily dismissed, damages chances of good info getting a fair hearing.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)
On it's face, I can see no logic to the argument that 5G could be linked to the corona-virus.
#3. To: Liberator (#2)
Given your Birds/Bees death-toll theory (which I also believe is legit), why wouldn't the same damaging microwave energy also cause humans serious DNA and cellular havoc?
Don't kid yourself; MANY people already know the dangers of 5G.
Who determines what is a "far fetched theory"? And why?
Replies to Comment # 3.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]