While it does have its virtues, the Internet however bas become a serious issue when it comes to validity, Oh, it does give everyone a voice that can be hear around the world, it is unfortunate that often times this virtual freedom creates legitimacy out of false information and suckers like you fall for it? Why? Because it is something you want desperately to believe. You really should quit being so damned gullible
I could really rub your nose into this, but I will let you off easy this time. For after all, its Easter and my heart is joyous and generous today
You can't dispute anything said in the video. Why is that?
It is that I would do the same if some masseu were also saying this in a video.
Neither of them has any creditability. A masseu gives massages and this chiropractor in the video also gives massages and posture work.
So, neither of these two have any knowledge whatsoever on a treatment cure and can in no way offer expert opinion on coronavirus cures.
A chiropractor is basically a sports medicine specialist. Chiropractors are NOT medical doctors, they do not go to med school. They hold a doctorate of chiropractic degree which is like having a doctorate in English or something, not a medical degree.
So, I look on this dude the same as I look on you and Deckard he is just another maniac who feels he knows everything about anything.
The only difference is that he screams for attention on youtube while you and Deckard do it on LF.
You're a feeble old man with dementia. We should listen to you right flake? Na thanks you are immoral and lie to yourself. You can't even read the document and understand it. Weirdo.
#13. To: Gatlin with his head in the sand again (#11)(Edited)
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance that principle is contempt prior to investigation. -Herbert Spencer
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance that principle is contempt prior to investigation. -Herbert Spencer
Let it become a matter of record here and be it forever known that I definitely have absolutely no contempt prior to investigation since I took the time to investigate and find out who Herbert Spencer is.
I found that:
Herbert Spencer (27 April 1820 8 December 1903) was an English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, sociologist, and prominent classical liberal political theorist of the Victorian era.
Furthermore
Spencer first articulated his evolutionary perspective in his essay, 'Progress: Its Law and Cause', published in Chapman's Westminster Review in 1857, and which later formed the basis of the First Principles of a New System of Philosophy (1862). In it he expounded a theory of evolution.
So, Stone, the mere absurd idea that you expect to me pay any attention whatsoever to a self-confirmed liberal as well as a self-declared evolutionist speaks wonders about you.
Will you ever stop embarrassing yourself?
I fear not.
May God have eternal mercy on you and forgive you for not ever knowing what you sayeth.
BTW I most certainly do have contempt after investigation and I am displaying that towards you now.
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance that principle is contempt prior to investigation. -Herbert Spencer
No matter his view on various matters. That is a true statement. If you ever come out from under your bed maybe you could have something to say on the matter. But you're just a loser so I don't think you will ever have anything important or of substance to post. I mean who wants to take advice from a loser who can't even understand the first amendment.
At least you can change a bed pan with a smile. That is something. So you're not all bad. Just willingly ignorant.