United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Walmart to limit customers in stores to reduce risk of spreading coronavirus
Source:
KWQC TVt6
URL Source: https://www.kwqc.com/content/news/W ... ing-coronavirus-569361671.html
Published: Apr 3, 2020
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2020-04-04 06:33:50 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 7263
Comments: 41
Retail giant Walmart is the latest to announce new restrictions inside its stores to help promote social distancing and limit the spread of the coronavirus. Walmart is making changes to help limit the spread of the coronavirus. (Source: Jace Barraclough/KNOP) The company said it will allow no more than five customers per 1,000 square feet at a given time starting Saturday. This is roughly 20 percent its normal capacity. Employees will admit customers one-by-one while counting to enforce this restriction. Once the store reaches capacity, customers will be allowed in on a “one-in-one-out” basis. There will be only one-way movement in the stores once customers are inside. This is to help promote social distancing and keep people at a distance from each other while shopping. Walmart has previously added sneeze guards and social distance markers in stores. It also is no longer operating any of its stores 24 hours a day so employees can do a thorough cleaning each night.
reduce risk of spreading coronavirus
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
Good Morning … I have a question I wish to present to you with respect to the following quote: Yeah - who can disagree with that? You can say now that both Walmart and Costco will disagree with that since they are both severely limiting the number of customers in their stores. Since the good preacherman used these two companies as a justification for his action – or actually the lack of thereof – do you think he will now follow suit out of his concern for the potential serious harm to the health and the possibly of death to his beloved faithful parishioners? Or will simply sanitizing the church daily still be enough? What do you think …
*shrugs* You'll have to ask him, but I believe he will continue to hold services until they SWAT him and his church. There is a possibility of death anytime you walk out the door. Why should Christians be denied the opportunity to worship together?
So you say … And that can only mean that you are someone with a fatalistic approach to life and someone who believes outcomes are determined in advance and can't be changed. I however do not believe as you do, that destiny controls you – For I believe that I control my own destiny. Fatalistic often relates to bad things, as you so notably declared here. Your ce que se sera approach to life reflects a fatalistic attitude toward situations, chances are that means you are expecting things to turn out badly and you see no point in trying to change that outcome. Unlike you, before I walk through any door – I am going to know what is on the other side … Respectfully … Just for you:
Interesting yet ludicrously desperate, attempting to sum up my beliefs with a song? (BTW, it's Que Sera Sera.) ...the future's not ours to see... Which is what the song is really about. No one can see the future, just as no one can predict what will happen when they drive to the store. ...chances are that means you are expecting things to turn out badly Expecting things to go badly? Yes, of course. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. Which is why I drive and move about completely aware of what might or could happen and expecting the unexpected. "Situational Awareness" it's called. You can look it up. I don't quite grasp why you would deem that a "fatalistic attitude". and you see no point in trying to change that outcome. You can't stop or change something that is already destined to happen, but you can prepare and plan for any scenario that may come up while out and about. Carrying a pistol is an option depending where you live. The point is if trouble is going to happen, then it's best to be prepared for it.
The point is if trouble is going to happen, then it's best to be prepared for it. Respectfully …
I agree that is up to us to change our destiny and that our action or inaction will effect it.
That is NOT whay you have been saying all this time. It is I who have repeatedly said that I [we] can control my [our] destiny. Finally – Geeeze …
My point remains: No one can see the future, just as no one can predict what will happen when they drive to the store.
You are confused. That was not your original point. Stop with the spin …
“I want to say to all those who are preparing the potential of religious services this weekend — if you go to your synagogue, if you go to your church and attempt to hold services after having been told so often not to, our enforcement agents will have no choice but to shut down those services. Law enforcement will inform them they need to stop the services and disperse. If that does not happen, they will take additional action up to the point of fines and potentially closing the building permanently. Any thoughts on this troubling development, or you just going to play your silly little games?
#32. To: Deckard (#29)
(Edited)
Law enforcement will inform them they need to stop the services and disperse. If that does not happen, they will take additional action up to the point of fines and potentially closing the building permanently. Given the choice that you so graciously afforded me – Of course, I had rather play my silly little games. It is so much more enjoyable doing than to unnecessarily worry about something I cannot control. [You see how I can control my destiny.] BTW – Speaking of silly little games. Did Stone ever contact you. He should have. He asked me: “Do you suck dick?” I told him that I did not – I was not that kind. I then told him to try you. I digress – Back on point … If what “Big Bird” is doing is legal, then he can do it. If it is not legal, he will do it anyway and later be will hopefully be sued or challenged in court if it was not legal. I have no controlling power as to what “Big Bird” does – So, I am here to testify that: “ What happens in New York – Stays in New York.” At least we should all hope and pray that it does … Respectfully> I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. But as it happens a couple times a day now, my meal was delivered from my favorite 5 star restaurant. And it was highly enjoyable …
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest "Is it any more irresponsible than people going into Costco where there's a thousand people, a WalMart where there's 300 people, and I'm not posing any more of a threat than the people who are at the mall right now...it seems that the church is being persecuted because we are an easier target.
#4. To: Gatlin (#1)
Since the good preacherman used these two companies as a justification for his action – or actually the lack of thereof – do you think he will now follow suit out of his concern for the potential serious harm to the health and the possibly of death to his beloved faithful parishioners? Or will simply sanitizing the church daily still be enough?
#8. To: Deckard (#4)
There is a possibility of death anytime you walk out the door.
#17. To: Gatlin (#8)
(Edited)
Your ce que se sera approach to life reflects a fatalistic attitude toward situations,
#22. To: Deckard (#17)
-
arrying a pistol is an option depending where you live. 
If you say trouble is going to happen and you can be prepared for it and prevent it – then you you are definitely controlling destiny. That is something you have repeatedly said that you could never do …
#24. To: Gatlin (#22)
(Edited)
If you say trouble is going to happen and you can be prepared for it and prevent it – then you you are definitely controlling destiny.
#26. To: Deckard (#24)
-
I agree that is up to us to change our destiny and that our action or inaction will effect it.
#27. To: Gatlin (#26)
It is I who have repeatedly said that I [we] can control my [our] destiny.
#28. To: Deckard (#27)
-
My point remains: No one can see the future, just as no one can predict what will happen when they drive to the store.
#29. To: Gatlin (#28)
During a press conference streamed online, de Blasio announced:
Replies to Comment # 29. During a press conference streamed online, de Blasio announced:
Any thoughts on this troubling development, or you just going to play your silly little games?
“I want to say to all those who are preparing the potential of religious services this weekend — if you go to your synagogue, if you go to your church and attempt to hold services after having been told so often not to, our enforcement agents will have no choice but to shut down those services.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]