[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Hollywood has been more heavily censored since 2001, films bashing US army & CIA can’t go public – Oliver Stone to RT The American film industry changed beyond recognition after the milestone year of 2001, director Oliver Stone told RT, with producers using financial restraints to censor movies challenging the US military or the CIA. Maybe in the 1980s, when I did Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July and Heaven & Earth, I could do that, because it was a slightly more relaxed system, said the award-winning filmmaker, mentioning his famed movies while making his case during former Ecuadorean President Rafael Correas show on RT Spanish. When the Iron Curtain fell and the Cold War ended, things didnt change for the better, Stone believes. My film career has suffered, because sometimes Ive said things that American producers hate to hear, he revealed, adding that those sponsoring film productions sometimes resort to economic censorship. Hollywood has changed since 2001. It has become more censored. The military, the CIA, the depictions of these organizations has been very favorable. You can take the budgets down
lets say you want to make a film criticizing the American military, taking an Iraq war story or a horror story that recently happened in Iraq
You do those kinds of stories, its not going to happen, he explained. Stone, who scored a number of Academy, BAFTA and Golden Globe awards, has been widely criticized for his anti-war dramas and, most recently, for a series of films questioning the widespread Western narrative on the Ukrainian turmoil, as well as exclusive interviews with Vladimir Putin. Now, censorship isnt something that exclusively affects the American film industry, Stone lamented, I can read the American media but they all say the same things
And you dont hear from Iran and China, you dont hear from [North] Korea, you dont hear from Venezuela, you dont get their point of view. The CIA realized after World War II, basically they [went into] the business, the news business, they put their people, their agents at newspapers, at magazines and television. The famed film director sounded pessimistic when asked if there is hope for change or, at least, if the system allows for that change. He said that both parties be it Democrats or Republicans act by the same playbook when dealing with issues of war and peace. There is no party in the United States, no democratic voice except third parties that are small, that would say Why are we fighting wars? Stone exclaimed, adding, its all right-wings fighting with right-wings. Democrats are no better than Republicans, he says: Hillary Clinton and her group, and Joe Biden, are just as pro-war as any Republican Dick Cheney. Stone thinks Donald Trump who has done horrible things by pulling out of the Paris climate accords and the hard-earned 2015 Iran nuclear deal. But, argued Stone, at least Trump was asking why the US needs to fight the Russians, which alarmed the mainstream so much that the media was attacking him from day one. Stone lamented that politics is transiting from the art of the possible to the art of raising money. So much money is spent in politics, its impossible for my vote to make any difference
Candidates in America now have to raise billions of dollars to be considered serious, Stone said. Empires fall. Lets pray that this empire, these evil things
because we are the evil empire. What Reagan said about Russia is true about us. Poster Comment: There is no party in the United States, no democratic voice except third parties that are small, that would say Why are we fighting wars? Stone exclaimed, adding, its all right-wings fighting with right-wings. Democrats are no better than Republicans, he says: Hillary Clinton and her group, and Joe Biden, are just as pro-war as any Republican Dick Cheney.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Bad word choice. There is no "censor" here. Nobody with government or quasi-governmental authority is striking down Stone's right to make very controversial films. What he is whining about is that INVESTORS - the people who PAY for the films to be made - won't give money to producers to make films that attack the country. People who invest in films generally do so to make money. If they think something will offend the public, that means they think that they will lose money if they invest in it, so they choose not to extend their money. It's THEIR money, after all, not Roger's. Roger is calling people who won't give him money to invest in his films "censors". Apparently he thinks people have a DUTY to give money to him and risk losing it on offensive films. Well, THEY DON'T. It's THEIR money. Roger Stone is a multimillionaire. If he wants to put out a film, he can pay to do so himself. There's no censor out there to stop him. But he doesn't do that, because the name of the game in Hollywood is to get other people, with stars in their eyes, to throw money down the rathole of making a film. Savvy investors are very careful about investing in movies.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|