LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Chelsea Clinton's dubious 'earnings' She made big bucks in chemicals and TV, courtesy of nepotism, not skill
Source:
Washington Times
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 8, 2020
Author: Tammy Bruce
Post Date: 2020-01-08 09:05:57 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 33808
Comments: 162
With all the talk about Hunter Biden these days, one might get the impression that he is the only child of a politician to benefit from his parents’ position and the last name they inherited. Before Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, got his strange but lucrative deal to sit on the board of energy company Burisma Holdings in Ukraine to the tune of $50,000 a month, there was Chelsea Clinton, the only child of former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She was similarly rewarded with jobs and board positions that had absolutely no relationship with that young woman’s interests, life, education or any perceived expertise. All of this has racked up to what the New York Post reported back in 2015 was an estimated net worth of $15 million for the then-34-year-old. More recently, Barron’s, the finance newspaper, revealed that Chelsea Clinton has now reaped $9 million from a corporate board position. In 2011, while her mother was still secretary of state, she was appointed to IAC/Interactive, an Internet investment company. She receives an annual $50,000 retainer and $250,000 worth of restricted IAC stock units, according to Barron’s. Ironically, and something the Clintons would be loathed to admit, they like most other American families benefitted from President Donald Trump’s leadership and correlating economic renaissance. The Hill reported, “IAC stock has risen 89%, 50% and 36% in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, a far steeper rise in the broader stock market Consequently, Chelsea Clinton reported in December of last year her holdings ballooned to $8.95 million. In 2017, Chelsea Clinton was also named to travel site Expedia’s Board of Directors. Because she’s a … business genius? A travel genius? An investment prodigy? The Hill
Poster Comment: The Clintons are racketeers and murderers. The pile of dead bodies they leave behind them in their unhindered quest for illegal riches should be enough to lock the three of them away for 50 years. Incidentally, Chelsea is absolutely ghastly looking and watching her speak is like a Disney cartoon come to life. Her comments are always vacuously stupid.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 115.
#1. To: IbJensen (#0)
Families look after their children. I see nothing wrong with that, as long as it is not illegal. Companies giving Chelsea Clinton board roles to have access to her famous and powerful parents is not illegal. So what's the issue, then, jealousy?
Are you out of your mind asking me a question like that? I recall thinking you were an asshole after reading some of your blurbs, but that comment puts you in the asshole category. That, of course, puts you in bed with the Democrat-Communist Party which you might enjoy.
Vic is a hardcore Catholic. They are always more sympathetic to monarchy, the very lifeblood of nepotism vs. meritocracy. Part and parcel of Catholic dogma over the centuries. The only surprise would be if he wasn't. And, yes, if he could advance his daughter's prospects by underhanded behavior or influence peddling, he would do it in a heartbeat and have no qualms about it. You might as well act shocked that your dog gobbled up a piece of steak that fell on the floor during a meal. They might feign some guilt but they don't feel any in that circumstance.
I too am a Roman Catholic. The difference between myself and V is perhaps that I am Sedevacantist.
Interesting. It does raise a lot of interesting questions about religion to take the Sedevecantist position. I can barely imagine what you think about Pope Frank and his colorful opinions (when he isn't busy slapping women away if they dare to touch his sleeve). LOL. I notice that Pope Frank is now telling Catholic youth that it is a profound error to convert non-Christians to Catholicism. Well, finally something us Prots can agree with. : ) And, finally, in honor of the latest stupid Star Wars movie, here's a bit from the same satirists on C3PO crash-landing into a Pentecostal church. [redleghunter loves these Lutheran satires as much as I do.]
Everything that happened during and after Vatican II, including the popes during that dark time is invalid.
What about praying to Mary in violatoin of scripture. That was before Vatican II. The Catholics have been perverting scripture for centuries before Vatican II.
Mary was always a revered figure in the Catholic Church as well as other Christian denominations. She became recognized as a Saint in the Dark Ages and therefore close to God and Jesus. Believers aren't praying TO Mary, rather they come to her for solace.
She became recognized as a saint.... That is not the way it works. The saints are the christains. It is as simple as that. They are living. It is not something bestowed on you by popes who worship the pagan babylonian queen of heaven. Who is not Mary of the Bible mother of Jesus.
Nothing is 'simple' when it comes to religion! You're a big boy and you should know that.
#139. To: IbJensen, vicomte13 (#115)
Yes it is simple if you just ignore all the lies taught in Catholic "Church". A saint is a Christian. A saint isn't a saint because some poop stained Pope says so. 1 Corinthians 1:2 King James Version 2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their's and our's:
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
So what's the issue, then, jealousy?
#5. To: IbJensen, Vicomte13 (#2)
(Edited)
I recall thinking you were an asshole after reading some of your blurbs, but that comment puts you in the asshole category. That, of course, puts you in bed with the Democrat-Communist Party which you might enjoy.
#26. To: Tooconservative (#5)
#57. To: IbJensen, redleghunter (#26)
I too am a Roman Catholic. The difference between myself and V is perhaps that I am Sedevacantist.
#69. To: Tooconservative (#57)
#78. To: IbJensen (#69)
Everything that happened during and after Vatican II, including the popes during that dark time is invalid.
#82. To: A K A Stone (#78)
What about praying to Mary in violatoin of scripture. That was before Vatican II.
#89. To: IbJensen (#82)
She became recognized as a Saint
#115. To: A K A Stone (#89)
The saints are the christains. It is as simple as that
Replies to Comment # 115. he saints are the christains. It is as simple as that Nothing is 'simple' when it comes to religion! You're a big boy and you should know that.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 115.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]