[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Cops Give DUIs to People Not Even Driving a Car, Including People Using Uber Cops are apparently so hell bent on enforcing DUI laws that some of them are reportedly arresting folks for DUI—even if they are not driving. In Utah, there have been multiple instances of cops issuing DUIs to people who aren’t driving, and they are proud of it. This insanity is the result of police officers’ interpretation of an ill-defined law. As KUTV reports, in Utah, a person cannot drive, operate, or be in “actual physical control” of a car while under the influence or alcohol or drugs. There are a lot of factors that are looked at to determine if a person is in “actual physical control” of the car. “Actual physical control isn’t defined, it’s whatever the cop says it is,” said David Rosenbloom, a DUI defense attorney. This broad interpretation has led to people getting a DUI and they never got behind the wheel. Most DUI laws are in place to prevent folks from driving drunk and causing harm but leaving cops in charge of such a broad paintbrush in Utah is a problem. “You don’t have to be sitting in your car to get a DUI in Utah. You could be camping. If the keys are in the car and you’re listening to the radio, that’s a DUI,” he said. Rosenbloom knows this because he has represented people arrested for that very reason. Apparently cops will stake out camp sites and wait for people grab something from their car or listen to the radio and then sweep in to arrest them. This is not keeping anyone safe. It is predatory and it is wrong. Nevertheless, it happens at an increasing rate. As KUTV reports, Courts must look at the whole circumstance to determine if someone was in actual physical control — like where the person is in the car, if the steering wheel or controls are being touched, if the person is awake or asleep, or if the keys are in hand. “If you go out to your car, like one of my clients, at night to get your cigarettes, and you open that car door and you have alcohol on your breath, that’s a DUI,” said Rosenbloom. Ride share companies have played a major role in the reduction of driving under the influence. One would think that police officers would praise a bar patron for choosing to get an Uber instead of driving drunk. However, in at least one instance, one would be wrong. “If you call an Uber, like one of my clients, the Uber arrives and you go to lock your car up, the minute you touch that car, the cop arrested her for DUI,” Rosenbloom said. What kind of cop gives a person a DUI for choosing to take a ride share and merely locking up their car? That’s not public service. It’s extortion and kidnapping. However, it seems to be par for the course. In British Columbia, cops are even giving passengers — who have a designated driver — DUIs. When a BC mother went to a Christmas party earlier this month, she admittedly had too much to drink so she called her 22-year-old son to pick her up. When they went through a DUI checkpoint, the mother told police she’d been drinking. She was pulled from the car, given a sobriety test, and failed it. “She failed that, and she was given a 90-day [Immediate Roadside Prohibition] and the family vehicle was impounded for 30 days,” the woman’s lawyer Sarah Leamon said. This is ridiculous, but it gets worse. In many states, you don’t even have to be impaired to get a DUI. As TFTP has reported on numerous occasions, motorists in police state USA are snagging DUI charges for being stone cold sober. Roadside extortionists with badges calling themselves “experts” are the main culprits, according to several sources. The problem has gotten so out of hand that mainstream news media outlets are catching up on the sanctioned extortion and bravely reporting on the phenomena. One Phoenix cop in particular, Officer David Morris has made 56 DUI arrests since April 2018. In a state which annually doles out over 21,000 DUI’s per year, Morris’ numbers are not all that astounding. It’s just that several of his alleged perpetrators whom he arrested for DUI were absolutely, completely, 100 percent, sober. Tasha McConnell said her DUI was traumatizing. She said she was pulled over for failing to come to a complete stop at a stop sign but that Morris wanted to dig into her drug history immediately asking her what drugs she was taking, prescription or otherwise. He told her her “eye tremors” were giving it away and his supposed DRE experience made an expert at determining impairment. McConnell told the press: It was quite embarrassing…I knew I did nothing wrong…They just kept sticking to asking me what drugs I was on…He asked me if I was on marijuana. He insisted I was on harder drugs. Despite passing a breathalyzer and a blood test showing she had absolutely nothing in her system, McConnell was still charged with DUI. This is what preventing drunk driving looks like in the land of the free.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
DUI laws are an abomination against the Constitution. The ONLY way someone should be charged for this crime is if they by observation with a lawyer present. The arrest can happen by observation of a patrol officer. A breath test should be voluntary, without repercussions for refusal. A blood test must be taken in the case of a vehicle accident only. In a time where video is easy to take, that should be the best choice for charging drivers.
THIS IS A TAG LINE...Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|