[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

College to look into how its wasp mascot (yes, the insect) is related to systemic oppression

White couple arrested after gun pulled on black family

Police Departments Asked "Live PD" To Cut Footage That Made Cops Look Bad

The Old America Is Dead. Where Do We Go from Here?

The World Through the Eyes of a Globalist ((Twilight Zone 2020))

Now Even The COMMON COLD Is Being Counted As A Positive COVID-19 Result, CDC Says

Trump: Planned BLM mural in NYC a “symbol of hate” that would “denigrate” Fifth Avenue

The Teenage Girl Gang That Seduced and Killed Nazis

Camera off Mask off (the dickhead)

11 Redacted Seconds of Video of Fatal 2014 Drug Bust Undermine Florida Cops' Official Story

Revival with Miracles Breaks Out in Spot Where George Floyd Died in Police Custody

Tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been double-counted, officials admit

Rand Paul Slams Fauci For Failed ‘Central Planning’ Approach To Pandemic Response

Car Owners Will be Forced To Breathe Into A Breathalyzer To Start Their Vehicles

Fauci’s Remdesivir Costs $9 Per Dose, Will Be Sold at $3,000 per Treatment — China Company Linked to Soros Will Also Mass Produce the Drug

Golden State Killer: former police officer pleads guilty to string of murders

HospiTal LefT Quadriplegic WiTh COVID-19 ... To Die - Because He Lacked --- “QualiTy of Life”

John Bolton – Traitor to Common Decency

Fox Analyst Apologises For Saying It Takes ‘Courage’ To Stand For National Anthem

Chief Federal Judge in Los Angeles Resigns After Using ‘Racist’ Term “Street Smart”

Couple Points Guns at Defund Police Protesters Outside Home in St Louis

Mask Of The Beast And Deadly Distancing

RETRO=RICKY Plays Amiga games.

SANNITY ... JusT joined --- Parler !

Drugs and Ammo

Rand Paul Tries (Again!) To Make It Harder for Police To Take Your Stuff

“This is Not Seattle – We’re Not Putting Up with This Lawlessness Here” – Oklahoma Judge Charges Protesters with Terrorism, Rioting and Assault

California Legislature Votes To Remove Anti-Discrimination Language From State Constitution

Maria Elvira Salazar on Twitter (Candidate for congress in Florida)

"Not Peace, but a Sword" (Sermon on Matthew 10:34-42)

Abortion is a diabolical weapon of mind control.

Global Goal: Unite for Our Future Concert (NWO propaganda programming)

Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data

‘He Should Wear Cuffs’: Netizens React to Dick Cheney’s Advice on Wearing Masks

Journalist Scorches California Officials for Excessive Lockdowns in Epic Speech

Woman Assaulted at BLM Protest For Holding “Police Lives Matter” Sign

Marxists Show Up to Christian Prayer Rally at St. Louis Statue, Demand Removal of Statue of Catholic Saint (VIDEOS)

Simpsonville man sues Greenville County Sheriff’s Office after getting shot by deputy inside own home

Video: Washington Sheriff On Governor’s Mask Law – “Don’t Be A Sheep”

Maskless man faces charge of assaulting a public servant after altercation with judge who wrote mask order

Good source for an "Asp" type collapsible baton?

Tucker Carlson: Trump could well lose the election - he must defend America's institutions

AGW Dating, Part II

List of 269 companies supporting Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the lines have been drawn

The Real Reason for the Face Diaper Mandates

Kansas State Student Flooded With Death Threats Over George Floyd Joke, School Launches Investigation Into HIM

Black Lives Matter Hate Hoaxer Shaun King Not Really Black?

Biden: 120 Million Dead from COVID-19

HBO Bans South Park Episodes That Depict Muhammad (Islamic law guides decision to ban episodes)

Yahoo Pushes For Replacing Star-Spangled Banner With John Lennon’s "Imagine"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Victory for Free State Activist Wrongfully Arrested for Filming Police at Checkpoint
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2019/1 ... ming-police-at-checkpoint.html
Published: Nov 16, 2019
Author: Joe Wright
Post Date: 2019-11-17 14:20:36 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 778
Comments: 20

By Joe Wright

Contrary to what many police would like the public to believe, the Constitution isn’t null and void when in their presence.  In fact, it’s quite the opposite: it can be seen as the public’s duty to hold police accountable during any and all interactions with them.

True, federal courts have disputed such rights in the past, but it is still widely recognized in all 50 states that a person has the right to film police so long as they are not directly interfering with police work. That said, we have covered many cases where people have been threatened, abused, and arrested for filming police, so one must do so at one’s peril.

Checkpoints are particularly contentious, as they have cropped up in ever-increasing numbers across the U.S.  According to the latest information from the CDC, sobriety checkpoints in particular are permitted in 38 states and D.C., with only 13 states conducting weekly activity. Again, many people assume that all rights end there. Fortunately, courageous activists have steadfastly refused to obey the arbitrary orders given during these encounters.

The Free State Project in New Hampshire is one such organization that promotes the fundamentals of liberty and engages in a wide variety of activism in order to demonstrate their principles.  Despite New Hampshire ranking near the top for the freest states, activist Christopher Waid learned that these principles were not respected in Manchester, NH when he attempted to film a DWI checkpoint on April 20, 2017.

As reported by the New Hampshire Union Leader:

He was on the south side of Bridge Street and crossed two lanes of roadway to reach the median and get closer to the checkpoint. At that point, a confrontation occurred between Waid and Officer Robert Harrington with Harrington telling Waid to move to the sidewalk, according to the claim.

According to the claim, Harrington grabbed Waid’s camera; Waid said he was a member of the press and Harrington had no right to take it.

Harrington said, according to Waid’s lawsuit, “I don’t need you in my face” and demanded identification. Waid said he has no obligation to show an ID.

The lawsuit states that Harrington threatened to jail Waid unless he returned to the sidewalk; Waid said go ahead, and Harrington arrested him for disorderly conduct and jaywalking.

Prosecutors later dropped both charges.

Although Waid was not charged, he subsequently retained a lawyer who threatened to sue the police department for violating his constitutional rights (1st and 14th Amendments).  After a lengthy back-and-forth, the city has capitulated and awarded a settlement of $15,000 to Waid.

The city denies any wrongdoing, and the settlement was reached “to buy peace,” the settlement agreement reads.

It turns out that this particular department is fortunately an anomaly, according to Waid, who said that this was the first time he had ever had an issue with filming a checkpoint. However, this department also has had to pay out for other constitutional violations in the past, according to the report:

In 2017, it paid $275,000 to Alfredo Valentin, whom police arrested in 2015 when he recorded a raid on his house. In 2017, the city also paid $89,000 to Theresa Petrello, a veteran who was arrested in 2015 during a crackdown on panhandling.

Naturally, these expenses are paid by taxpayers, which illustrates the importance of police knowing that the public is watching their every move. Sadly, it can be dangerous simply to encounter police in modern-day America, let alone flex your rights and demand equal respect.

Interestingly, the $15,000 settlement is the same amount that a Colorado bill urged as a fine for police who interfere with the public filming them. Moreover, this bill urged that payment be taken from the officers themselves, which I suspect will do much more to alleviate this problem than passing it on to innocent taxpayers who are arguably already extorted from.

As always, it is important to know the laws in your area and proceed with due caution when interacting with police officers. Be respectful, but have the fortitude to assert your rights. Thank you to Christopher Waid and the many other activists who have shown us the way.


You can read more from Joe Wright at Activist Post, where this article first appeared.

H/T: MassPrivateI (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

Although Waid was not charged, he subsequently retained a lawyer wh who wh who threatened to sue the police department for violating his constitutional ri rights

If I'm detained at a sobriety checkpoint, where's my 4th amendment right to privacy protecting me from being recorded by some yahoo without my permission and posted for all to see?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-17   15:12:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite (#1)

where's my 4th amendment right to privacy

Not in a public place.

Defamation, OTOH, is actionable if the videographer manifests that.

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-20   12:16:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#2)

where's my 4th amendment right to privacy
Not in a public place.

"Although someone may not have a right to seclusion when in the public view, the law can still protect people from being portrayed in a way that could be considered humiliating or from having their private details broadcast."

If someone records me at a DUI checkpoint, I'm suing their ass.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-20   14:31:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

If someone records me at a DUI checkpoint, I'm suing their ass.

For what?

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-20   16:50:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#4)

If someone records me at a DUI checkpoint, I'm suing their ass.
For what?

For portraying me in a way that could be considered humiliating or from having my private details broadcast.

I thought I already explained that.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-21   9:10:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite (#5) (Edited)

You would have no case. You would pay the attorney fees and more of your opponent. Anyone is free to record and ridicule you and pass out videos to all your neighbors. They could even make a drunkmisterwhite website to rub it in real deep.

A K A Stone  posted on  2019-11-21   9:20:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#6)

Anyone is free to record and ridicule you and pass out videos to all your neighbors. They could even make a drunkmisterwhite website to rub it in real deep.

Yes they are. And I'm free to sue them.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-21   10:44:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#5)

A public DUI checkpoint isn't private.

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-21   23:14:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#8)

A public DUI checkpoint isn't private.

Certainly not when citizens are recording me and portraying me in a way that could be considered humiliating or from having my private details broadcast.

But I suppose you'd say they have a good reason for recording the activities at that one specific DUI checkpoint. What might that be?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-22   9:22:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: misterwhite (#9)

What might that be?

If someone wants to ridicule and make fun of you they can and you can't stop it. You can file a lawsuit and then you just lose more. You pay for your lawyer and theirs and a fine,

Quit pretending.

A K A Stone  posted on  2019-11-22   9:30:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#9) (Edited)

But I suppose you'd say they have a good reason for recording the activities at that one specific DUI checkpoint. What might that be?

Making sure the police don't frame and falsely accuse innocent flamingos like you...

...of course.

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-22   9:44:39 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#11)

Making sure the police don't frame and falsely accuse innocent flamingos like you...

Wow! Recording the activities at one DUI checkpoint on one occasion will accomplish all that? How selfless of them!

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-22   11:16:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: misterwhite (#12) (Edited)

Wow! Recording the activities at one DUI checkpoint on one occasion will accomplish all that?

Why does the 1st Amendment protect a free press?

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-22   11:39:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#13)

Why does the 1st Amendment protect a free press?

Some yahoo recording me at a DUI checkpoint without my permission is a freedom of the press issue?

Why does that trump my fourth amendment right to sue citizens who record me and portray me in a way that could be considered humiliating or from having my private details broadcast?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-22   16:27:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: A K A Stone (#6)

They could even make a drunkmisterwhite website to rub it in real deep.

Hey, good idea.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2019-11-22   16:51:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: misterwhite (#14) (Edited)

There are no private details at public check points.

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-23   10:32:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#16)

There are no private details at public check points.

Then why don't the police search every car they stop at the checkpoint?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-24   10:07:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: misterwhite (#17)

No probable cause.

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-24   12:05:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#18)

No probable cause.

Ah. So when you said "There are no private details at public check points" you were just joking.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-11-24   14:13:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: misterwhite (#19)

If you are publicly visible you're not in private.

The non-visible contents of your vehicle would be in private.

Judas Goat  posted on  2019-11-24   14:26:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com