Title: "Space Satellite" Crashes To Earth (Balloon & Tether still attached) Source:
A Michigan Yard URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK_kWN0BsKs Published:Nov 2, 2019 Author:Channel 4 Post Date:2019-11-02 13:12:15 by Liberator Keywords:NASA, Balloon, HOAX Views:5411 Comments:24
Poster Comment:
I HOPE you all noticed this event as reported by MSM not long ago. They hated to report this, but they had to. It was posted on Social Media, where it immediately went viral. (These thing have been falling all the time, but rarely reported.)
Note: The Balloon is still attached to this "Satellite." The Media tried to downplay and spin the attached Balloon as a "Parachute."
NASA: "Ooops. Our pants are down again. Meh." Sufficient numbers of Space Addicts and Pod People will remain mesmerized by our wizardry no matter what. They have been programmed well.
Well, actually...no, you can't and will not able to hide the truth forever. The Cat IS out of the Bag.
What "truth" is that you may ask?
1) ALL "Space-Satellites" are nothing but devices lifted (or propelled) into VERY Low Earth Orbit by HELIUM-FILLED BALLOONS.
This has always been the case -- I'd posted a video of such a case documented by an amateur videographer who caught a balloon drifting in front of the moon, toting a "Satellite."
Also posted: NASA's own documentation of its Balloon-Propulsion program since the mid-1950s. That report included the balloon-propulsion documentation of 'Mir', a famous a Soviet "Satellite" in the late 1990s into the early 2000s.
2) Those NASA/ Space X "Space Rockets" we keep witnessing over the decades at Cape Canaveral and elsewhere?
DOCUMENTED: Watch any rocket launch. The Rocket will rise, then arc over the Atlantic Ocean into the Bermuda Triangle area (or over other oceans), where the debris is recovered WITHOUT PRYING EYES. (Meanwhile, we've all let ourselves believe this illusion and NASA "magic-tricks" for 60 years and counting still.)
3) IF we truly believe our "Satellites" provide Dish and TV reception as well as what's transmitted in "The Cloud," WHY then are cell phone towers built all over creation?
Why then the need for every tall/high edifice be festooned with "Satellite" dishes? WHY then are our Dishes aimed for a specific tower for "the best reception"?
Nice related analysis of this "space-selfie," Fish-Eye lens curvature, Truman Show analogy, Land-Tower tech, and other synthetic truth like referring to fallen balloon and satellites as "Weather-Balloons" as cover for NASA projects, etc.
That was a "SpaceSelfie" balloon built by Raven Industries and launched by Samsung as a promotional pitch for their Galaxy S10.
Since it was never in orbit, it's not a satellite. It's not even a "space" object since it only achieved an altitude of 65,000 feet and the edge of space is at 62 miles (the Kármán line).
Since it was never in orbit, it's not a satellite. It's not even a "space" object since it only achieved an altitude of 65,000 feet and the edge of space is at 62 miles (the Kármán line).
I gotta give you credit and respect for weighing in on this.
Yes, it is and was a "space-object." None of these craft can rise anywhere above 120,000 feet. 65,000 feet (about 12-13 miles) is about as high as most "Space" craft go/drift.
Yes, I am acutely aware that this was technically called a "Space-Selfie." ( What a cute name for a fallen Satellite!!); That yes, it's sponsor was "Samsung." Even private citizens have been lofting balloons into the Stratosphere, 120,000 ft above the earth plane. It's cheap, it's relatively easy, and every country has been doing it. Only they have been calling them, "WEATHER BALLOONS. Or, "SPACE SATELLITES"; OR, "COMM/SPY Satellites"; OR "Research Balloons."
As mentioned, AND the point: Balloons are the ONLY means of Low-Earth "orbit"; Not only was THIS "Selfie" Balloon/Satellite NOT in "orbit," NONE are. Not even the ISS. It too was propelled and directed by Helium Power, via Balloon. There it floats in the atmosphere above the Earth, where it is supplied with food and other stuff by OTHER helium-filled balloons.
MW, there is nothing "flying" to an altitude of 62 miles and staying there in what we are told is a near-vacuum or vacuum. Propulsion or survival in a "space" vacuum would defy all known physics.
It must be exhausting coming up with all the rationale for flat-earth bullshit.
To tell you the truth, Hank, it's incredibly simple.
I had no idea there was so much info and evidence that crushes the whole "Globe" Earth BS narrative while discrediting of the entire Moon/NASA program.
I will admit -- I was always skeptical of NASA and it's entire program and "Moon Landing"; it just wasn't a big deal to get into it.
That this realm we call "Earth" is NOT a ball; That it is NOT spinning; that there is NO "Gravity" -- learning THAT stuff is a trip.
(And again -- I know you take my position here personally, but please don't; any "credibility" factor has no bearing on compartmentalized employees and engineers who were working on legit projects. It's not like one compartment knows exactly what the others mission or job is.)
Where I grew up in north Jersey and NYC, it was well-known that certain "stores" were NOT as represented. Sure, the butcher was cutting meat and selling it; Sure, the shoe-maker was resoling and repairing shoes. We knew what was going on. "Front" businesses have been a thing for a long time.
Btw, quite a few of these "businesses" ironically happened to be "Pizzerias." :-)
On this topic, I agree with Pinguinite. There's a difference between criminal fronts and physics, but somehow the cockamamie rationales keep piling up.
If you don't believe physics, photography or many eyewitnesses, then just explain how the shadow of the Earth on the Moon during an eclipse is round.
And don't try to weasel out with "it's flat, but it's round". Why would that be, and why would it be oriented exactly parallel so as to cast a round, rather than elliptical, shadow?
You believe in the physics of shadows, I hope?
Is the Moon flat as well? Or is this just a masterful, straight-faced, long-term trolling experiment?
#9. To: Pinguinite, Hank Rearden, A K A Stone, Deckard, watchman, Deckard, ALL (#7)
About all I can do is shake my head, Liberator. No discussion is worthwhile, but best to you.
Ping, I never take your response personally; I realize you aren't being spiteful or malicious.
That said, please also don't take my thoughts personally either...(and neither should the rest of you.)
Let's be honest -- few of you read or watch the content I've provided. I know that. The truth is, I've discovered few of you care about truth. Or that you care that you might be lied to. So when you make lame attempts to dismiss the content, I've rolled my eyes; I've chuckled. I've roll my eyes again and shaken my head repeatedly. I almost think *I'M* the one being "trolled." I guess it really is much easier to deceive people than to convince them otherwise.
THIS. REALM. IS. FLAT. IT DOES NOT MOVE NOR SPIN. THE HORIZON: FLAT. All NASA photos use FISH_EYE LENS. (WOW -- do you really NOT get this yet??)
NASA uses (bad) CGI and Photoshop. They created fake, distorted "Blue Marbles." They gifted Petrified Wood to Denmark as "Moon-Rock"; They ADMIT: "We can't go beyond low earth orbit"; They ALL ADMIT: "We lost know-how to go to the Moon." (IF that know-how is actually "real" -- do they REALLY "lose" it?? What is this -- The Nixon Tapes? Hillary's hard-drive?? Come on, man.
Even Buzz Aldrin admitted he never went to the Moon. ON TAPE. Stop believing the Adult Santa Claus stories. ALL of them. WAKE UP!
There are about 3-4 people here who now understand that there are legitimately reasons to question the realm we've been taught/indoctrinated to believe is a "globe", as well as justifying any skepticism regarding the NASA Hoax.
Another 4-5 LF'ers will research the related subjects and know the truth of the matter within the year. The rest of LF will continue playing it safe, trusting what they are told by Gummint, by "Science," by the MSM, by our "Politicians," and ultimately "accepting the reality to which we have been presented."
Most people prefer illusion over reality. I get it. But are YOU "most people"? Even when presented the Truth on a silver platter they will reject it on the basis of early and constant indoctrination, programming and image-imprinting.
Over several months I have provided case after case, a litany of evidence that discredits and invalidates the previously "settled truth" claimed by the institutions of "Science," "History," and NASA. IF one refuses to watch, read, examine, research, or confirm the claims, that's not on me. (And no, ambiguous, anecdotal "disproof" of select 2% of the content does not suffice a having "dis-proven" the OTHER 98%.)
If you prefer to plug your ears, close your eyes and sing "la-la-la-la" in defiance of the evidence, preferring to continue believing the very same institutions who lie in all of our collective face, laugh in our face, and insult our intelligence -- than who am little ol' me to continue sharing the truth with any of you? Go ahead, reject it. It doesn't change my life....
But don't tell me YOU already "know the truth" when all you've done is regurgitated and echoed what you've been told by known liars. That "Truth" and "Science" teacher and life-time of TV and movies and commercials shove in your face; a life-time of globes, planets, Moon-crap, "Billions & Billions of Light Years," "Big-Bang," "prehistorical man" and "65 million year old" dinosaurs shove down your throat; even the so-called "Glory" of war was crammed in your face as a kid. You may want to re-think ALL of that baloney. It is ALL related PROGRAMMING. But...but WHY?? They care about us, right? They are trying to educate us, right?
They lie, mis-inform, and dis-inform. In order to control you, the sheeple, the cattle; To confuse you; To minimize your relevance. And of course, to hide God and REPLACE HIS GLORY, HIS TRUTH.
few of you read or watch the content I've provided.
Over several months I have provided case after case, a litany of evidence that discredits and invalidates the previously "settled truth" claimed by the institutions of "Science," "History," and NASA.
I try to pick through the stuff you spew...but there's just so MUCH of it.
litany of evidence
The one that really stands out was one of your MUST WATCH videos with Steve Quayle and company talking about how the Nazis are digging a tunnel from Patagonia to Antarctica.
Do you believe that Liberator? Are Nazis digging tunnels in Patagonia? Are they the old WWII Nazis that figured out how to live extra long life spans? And what happens if they dig too deep, and bust through the back side of the flat earth? What's back there anyway (like tree roots and worms and such)?
The one that really stands out was one of your MUST WATCH videos with Steve Quayle and company talking about how the Nazis are digging a tunnel from Patagonia to Antarctica.
You're right; You recently did admit your memory IS going. I can confirm it.
I try to pick through the stuff you spew...but there's just so MUCH of it.
"So much" of it, yet, your tiny brain is only able to recall your own delusional account of someone's else's fiction.
That "spewed stuff" is called "INFORMATION." And "Truth." In case you've forgotten, they help one connect dots, figure out problems, get logged as valuable knowledge, or determine the validity of certain claims or equations.
(In the meantime, better hurry and find that Patagonia, Begonia Antarctic "MUST WATCH videos with Steve Quayle and company talking about how the Nazis are digging a tunnel from Patagonia to Antarctica.")
Are they the old WWII Nazis that figured out how to live extra long life spans? And what happens if they dig too deep, and bust through the back side of the flat earth? What's back there anyway (like tree roots and worms and such)?
Sounds as if YOU'VE done a lot more reading & research of this subject.
In the meantime, better hurry and find that Patagonia, Begonia Antarctic "MUST WATCH videos with Steve Quayle and company talking about how the Nazis are digging a tunnel from Patagonia to Antarctica.")
You can find it quicker than me. You live and breathe that stuff.
Liberator, I've watched a fair amount of what you've posted. While I won't say I watched it with an open mind to the idea that the earth really is flat, I will say I've watched it with an open mind in wanting to understand the reasoning why some people argue that it is flat. That is, how good are the arguments? How logical? How flawed? What kind of supporting evidence is there?
I feel I've been open to all of that which is more than reasonable. And the arguments I've taken the time to hear & watch have been flawed in one way or another. What you call admissions I say are taken out of context. NASA does CGI work? Wouldn't doubt it as they are a publicly funded agency, they do need to answer to the public in the form of illustrations about what happens in space. It just goes on and on and on and on and on.
I have heard you out to the extent my patience allows. I've rebutted a number of arguments but you won't hear it. My favorite argument against FE is airline travel time between Chile and Australia. You've never rebutted that.
You should know that the longer you insist on flat earth, the more you actually validate my own position on the overwhelming power of the human mind to believe things that are not true, which is a position that quite conveniently explains why people believe what the Bible says, what the Koran says or what tea leaves say. It's the same reason why some Muslim jihadist are able to strap on explosives and blow themselves and innocent people for God. They believe THAT strongly. They are of course wrong but are nonetheless so convinced they will die for it. Some people believe the earth is some 6k years old. Others believe it it some 4.5 billion years old. Some believe it is flat. Most everyone believes it is a globe.
Given this human weakness when it comes, not to lack of faith but an excess of faith in so many things untrue, I simply cannot come to a sound conclusion that our academic knowledge is something that we will be judged upon. It makes no sense. Therefore, it's not important to me that you think the earth is flat. You are completely wrong, in my view, but if that's what makes sense, go for it. Maybe in your next life you'll see differently!
