A New Mexico armed government worker was caught on camera Hut! Hut! Hutting! an 11-year-old girl who took more milks from the cafeteria than she was supposed to, according to local news coverage.
This story isnt new in terms of the gratuitous, excessive force used by the AGW; that sort of thing is now depressingly routine. Whats new and interesting is that other adults who witnessed the Hut! Hut! Hutting! almost intervened.
The sixth grader apparently walked out of the cafeteria with more than her ration of milk and dared to step outside the school. These are, of course, heinous crimes that must be curb-stomped immediately.
The AGW screeches the usual Stop resisting! after body-slamming this kid into a wall and forcing her to the ground. Unusually, a school administrator feels compelled to tell the AGW: Shes not a threat to yourself or others.
The AGW indignantly replies, No. She is.
Of course, shes not. Unless you consider an unarmed 11-year-old girl a threat to a grown (and armed) man.
I use the term loosely.
The administrator tries again: Sir, we are not going to use excessive force to get this done.
Were not excessive! the AGW screams in response.
Watch the video; see and decide for yourself.
The AGW Zach Christensen also lied about what the girl did to justify the assault. He claimed she had assaulted school staff but this proved not to be true, according to news coverage.
Christensen quit before he could be fired; which means hes eligible to serve as an AGW somewhere else.
At some point, people watching the next Hut! Hut! Hutting! may do more than verbally object. There may be no other way to stop all this Hut! Hut! Hutting!
And its got to stop.
Whatever it takes.
Poster Comment:
The AGW Zach Christensen also lied about what the girl did to justify the assault. He claimed she had assaulted school staff but this proved not to be true, according to news coverage.
"An 11-year-old student, with known behavioral issues "
A nice way of saying, "An 11-year-old student who has a history of misbehaving." She might be 11, but she's built like a linebacker and almost as tall as the adults.
Maybe they should just let her steal all the milk she wants. She's black and she deserves special privileges.
Didn't watch the video or read TC's breakdown of the actual time it took for Dean to pull the trigger, did you sparky?
That was on the original thread where the Matts embarassed themselves so bad that they started this new thread so they could whore their wares on a new street corner, starting all over again as virgins.
As you seem to have missed it, here is a repeat of the dismissal of Matt as Tooconservative's bullshit story.
As for your ridiculous time estimate of the verbal warning and the shot, I downloaded the video to check it closely playing at slow speed.
The killer cop shouted "Put your hands up, show me your hands".
He began to open his mouth to yell at 00:01:34:28 (28 thirtieths of a second after the 1 minute 34 second point in the video).
He started to yell the 'P' in "Put" at 00:01:35:00, .0666 seconds after he started to open his mouth.
His voiced trailed off after yelling "hands", going quiet at 00:01:36:06
The initial sound of the gunshot began at 00:01:36:11 when the sound spiked and distorted sharply.
From the beginning of the 'P' in "Put" (00:01:34:28) to the beginning of the gunshot sound (00:01:36:11) is 1 and 13/30ths seconds. Or 1.43333 seconds. And I am actually being generous in that measurement by a few thirthieths (sic) of a second.
Damn Matt. Only an asshole of gigantic proportions could claim to have worked out the time to the one hundred thousandth of a second. This claim features the inescapable illogic of the jackass who fantasized about the distance of the Las Vegas shooting using Google Sketch.
The camera shoots 30 frames per second. Your calculation of 1.43333 seconds is bullshit, just as the Las Vegas numbers were bullshit. Using sampling every 1/30th of a second, and calculating to the hundred thousandth of a second is scientific bullshit. The variance of the camera between frames would be greater than 1/100000 of a second. Moreover, the sampling rate does not permit your fantastic calculation. You wasted your time. Don't waste my time, and every else's time with your bullshit.
A purported claim of a time interval calculated down to the 1/100,000th of a second qualifies as ridiculous, make believe bullshit.
As for your ridiculous time estimate of the verbal warning and the shot,
Of course, I made NO ESTIMATE of the time between the verbal warning and the shot. I linked, cited and quoted a news report from the Dallas News.
Questions and outrage after Fort Worth officer fatally shoots 28-year-old woman in her home
By Dana Branham DallasNews.com 7:52 PM on Oct 13, 2019
[excerpt]
In body-camera footage released Saturday, the officer who shot Jefferson is seen walking around the backyard of the home.
About a minute-and-a-half into the video, he swivels toward a window, then yells, Put your hands up! Show me your hands! and fires into the window within about three seconds.
I recall seeing a four-second estimate, but I went with the shorter one.
It is a non-specific estimate qualified with the word about. It does not make believe it is accurate to the 1/100,000th of a second.