[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: A Latina novelist spoke about white privilege. Students burned her book in response.
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/educ ... ents-burned-her-book-response/
Published: Oct 12, 2019
Author: Alex Horton
Post Date: 2019-10-12 05:56:50 by WWG1WWA
Keywords: Latina, students, book burning
Views: 1879
Comments: 16

The white students gathered around the fire, speculating why parts of the book were not already engulfed in flames.

“It’s a hard cover!” shouts one male student in a video amid laughs as ripped- out pages burn, torn from a novel written by a Hispanic author who had suggested white people are treated differently in society.

That angered some students at Georgia Southern University.

In response to Jennine Capó Crucet’s talk on the Statesboro, Ga., campus Wednesday, where she focused her discussion on white privilege, students gathered at a grill and torched her novel “Make Your Home Among Strangers” — about a first-generation Cuban American woman struggling to navigate a mostly white elite college.

“What makes you believe that it’s okay to come to a college campus, like this, when we are supposed to be promoting diversity on this campus, which is what we’re taught,” one student said at the microphone, the paper reported. “I don’t understand what the purpose of this was.”

Crucet responded that white privilege was evident within the question itself.

Other students had a different reaction and used photos and videos to troll Crucet on Twitter. One student sent a photo of ripped pages to Crucet over Twitter.

“Enjoy this picture of your book!” a tweet captured by the George-Anne said. “Have a nice night, Jennine. :-)”

*** The university is not planning to discipline any students for the burning incident, said Jennifer Wise, a university spokeswoman.

“While it’s within the students’ First Amendment rights, book burning does not align with Georgia Southern’s values ***

Crucet said on Twitter another event scheduled for Thursday was canceled “because the administration said they could not guarantee my safety or the safety of its students on campus because of open-carry laws.”

Wise said the event — a discussion with some first-year classes — was canceled at the request of Crucet’s representative.

Other students were dismayed over the book burning, a violent rejection of speech most notoriously associated with Nazi Germany.

“It makes me feel like we are being represented really badly. It makes me feel like these people make us look as a school and even as a freshman class really ignorant and racist,” Carlin Blalock, a freshman music education student, told the George-Anne.

“Just seeing it happen, I know they didn’t read the book or they didn’t care. It’s so disrespectful to even think about doing anything to that book because that’s her life story. I wish I could have been there to do something about it.”

PEN America, a speech and literature advocacy group, said the book burning was “deeply” disturbing in a statement.

“Book burning has a long history as a tactic to intimidate, silence, and denigrate the value of intellectual exchange,” said Jonathan Friedman, the group’s campus free speech director.

“Students have the right to exercise their own freedom of expression and book burning is also a protected act of expression. But this symbolic gesture aimed not just to reject or refute ideas but to obliterate the very paper on which they were written.”

Friedman also said the university’s statement did not go far enough in response.

“It behooves the university to educate its students about why book burning is so inimical to open discourse and free expression.”

Crucet concluded her Friday statement on the incident by saying that her “book began as an act of love and an attempt at deeper understanding."

“I hope GSU can act from the same place and work to affirm the humanity of those students who might understandably feel unsafe in the aftermath of the event and the book burning, and that the campus continues the difficult and necessary conversation that began in that auditorium.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

#3. To: WWG1WWA (#0)

Other students were dismayed over the book burning, a violent rejection of speech most notoriously associated with Nazi Germany.

Well, the Germans didn't use a backyard grill. And they didn't burn the books of just one author.

But they did have one thing in common -- students burned those books in Nazi Germany, not the government.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-10-12   10:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#3)

But they did have one thing in common -- students burned those books in Nazi Germany, not the government.

Not so fast.

The Nazis had taken over the German students union. They then attacked the Berlin's Institute for Sex Research, burning 20,000 books and 5,000 photos. Notice they initially portrayed themselves as protecting traditional morality against the pervs. And during the interregnum, Germany was certainly a hotbed of sexual perversion. Like Italy but more so.

From there, the Nazi student union expanded its burnings to Karl Marx and a popularizer of Marxism, the Czech-Austrian writer/philospher Kautsky. They then expanded their list of books to burn.

[T]he exclusion of "Left", democratic, and Jewish literature took precedence over everything else. The black-lists ... ranged from Bebel, Bernstein, Preuss, and Rathenau through Einstein, Freud, Brecht, Brod, Döblin, Kaiser, the Mann brothers, Zweig, Plievier, Ossietzky, Remarque, Schnitzler, and Tucholsky, to Barlach, Bergengruen, Broch, Hoffmannsthal, Kästner, Kasack, Kesten, Kraus, Lasker-Schüler, Unruh, Werfel, Zuckmayer, and Hesse. The catalogue went back far enough to include literature from Heine and Marx to Kafka.[3]

But it was always a Nazi organization, deeply embedded in the Nazi party structure who burned books.

Let's not have any of this "The Nazis didn't burn any books, it was just some unruly students".

It was the Nazis. Period.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-12   10:41:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tooconservative (#5)

The Nazis had taken over the German students union.

The Nazi government? If the Nazi government wanted to burn books there was nothing to stop them.

No doubt these German students were part of the Nazi Party, so if you want to claim "Nazis" burned books I won't argue. But my point was that it wasn't the Nazi government.

I'm guessing the students who burned Jennine Capó Crucet’s books are conservatives and members of the Republican Party. Are history books going to blame the federal government because Trump was President?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-10-12   11:07:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: misterwhite (#7)

No doubt these German students were part of the Nazi Party, so if you want to claim "Nazis" burned books I won't argue. But my point was that it wasn't the Nazi government.

The early book burnings, Kristallnacht, the Night of the Long Knives, all were directly instigated by the Nazi party.

There was, effectively, no separation between Nazi government and the Nazi party. Any distinctions were mostly arbitrary. The Nazi government did what the Nazi party wanted. And the party did what Hitler wanted. That was kind of the whole point.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-12   17:12:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#10)

The early book burnings, Kristallnacht, the Night of the Long Knives, all were directly instigated by the Nazi party.

For the second time. That's not the issue. I said the book burnings were not carried out by the German government. And they weren't. They were done by university students who, more than likely, were members of the Nazi Party.

Kristallnacht was carried out by the Sturmabteilung (SA) who were the Brown Shirts, a paramilitary organization.

The Night of the Long Knives was a government operation, but it was directed against the Sturmabteilung and their supporters who were getting too big for their britches.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-10-13   10:25:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: misterwhite (#12)

Kristallnacht was carried out by the Sturmabteilung (SA) who were the Brown Shirts, a paramilitary organization.

The Night of the Long Knives was a government operation, but it was directed against the Sturmabteilung and their supporters who were getting too big for their britches.

Not wanting to get into this in great detail, but aren't you giving the SA in Kristallnacht and the even SS (and Gestapo and Goering's secret police) in the Night massacre a successful Nuremberg defense? The S.A. is described as "a paramilitary organization" but in truth they were civilians with no official standing with the German state. Aren't you trying to say these thugs were "just following orders"?

I'm saying the Nazi party was the source of the political sentiment and the source of the persons who carried out these pogroms (and the book burnings). And they were the party in power that ignored their duty to uphold the law during these flagrant offenses against existing German law. In fact, German law in the Nazi era became completely irrelevant whenever it conflicted with party doctrine in official and non-official policy, including organized mass violence. German law was, for practical purposes, what the Nazi party wanted it to be and what was written as established statutory law was irrelevant.

All of it came directly from the Nazi party and nowhere else.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-13   10:38:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 14.

#15. To: Tooconservative (#14)

Aren't you trying to say these thugs were "just following orders"?

Not at all. Actually, I think the SA was a loose cannon and was viewed as a threat by the German government. Hence the Night of the Long knives.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-10-13 10:56:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com