[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Black Lives Matter: "We Will Burn Down This System" - Part II

BREAKING / CHICARGO HAS FALLEN / BEST COVERAGE / BEST CHAT

‘We see no point in wearing a face mask,’ Sweden’s top virus expert says as he touts the country’s improving COVID numbers

CNN Finally Discusses T Cell Immunity. Will New York And New Jersey Listen?

Invasion of the New Normals

Michael Flynn issues urgent plea to America

Exorcist, Fr. Ripperger, Says Politics Is Now Good vs. Evil

Beirut blast: Ammonium nitrate from leaky Russian cargo ship

Biden Campaign Says He Is So Close To A VP Pick He Can Smell Her

DeBlasio’s plan to destroy New York City is working wonderful

Bill Gates loves Twitter’s “block all replies” feature

An Aspect of the (WuFlu) Con

Trump shoots down reporter claim NJ club members violating coronavirus guidelines: 'It's a peaceful protest'

Twitter BANS All Links To Video-Sharing Site BitChute

Dan Crenshaw blasts Teen Vogue op-ed advocating end to private property rights

You Decide

President Trump Makes Cryptic Remark at Ohio Speech: “I Have a Lot of Enemies…This May Be the Last Time You’ll See Me for a While”

Misfits Alum Michale Graves Ripped for Joining 'Proud Boys' Hate Group and Supporting Donald Trump

New York City Will Now Have COVID-19 Checkpoints ‘Show Me Your Papers’

“Vote For Trump So California Secedes!” (Possible Post-election Scenarios)

Hidden FDA Document Explains Why “Liar” Fauci Opposes

AnyThing ThaT sTarTs wiTh ... “ammo” --- could be bad.

Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Praises Company For Firing Woman Who Posted “All Lives Matter” on Facebook

John Cleese: Woke People Have “Zero Sense Of Humour”; They’re Killing Comedy

Survey: Americans Think Coronavirus Has Killed 30 Million People in the U.S., 225 Times Higher Than Actual Figure

Billionaire media maven Oprah encourages white people to admit that they are racist in bizarre video

Kindergarten Cop Is Canceled, Likened to Birth of a Nation

The “Wokest” Company In Silicon Valley

Be “Perfect Victim,” “Do As They Say”: Minneapolis Govt Advises Citizens To Surrender to Criminals, Turn Over Your Valuables, Don’t Resist

Heavy Rain🌨🌨 and ⚡Thunder⚡ in the Farmhouse-Rain Storm Deep in the FOREST-Sleep-Study-Relax

Jeffry Epsteins Little black book

Is Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch Insulated?

Police Body Cam Video Shows Belligerent George Floyd on Drugs Resisting Arrest Before Death

Minneapolis City Government Urges for Victims to Submit to Criminals as They Defund the Police

Met Police destroyed records for the night Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with teenager in London, says former Royal protection officer

Crybaby twit Zippy Lomax, 44, cries about police smashing windows and slashing her tires

Question for Gatlin

ROCKING THE BOAT Uniformed Navy sailor caught on video screaming ‘f**k Trump’ at anti-mask protesters in California

‘We don’t need someone distracted with Twitter’: Ilhan Omar fights off tough primary challenge

Oregon’s Youngest Coronavirus Victim Tested Negative for the Virus

Chicago-Area Leaders Call for Illinois to Eliminate History Classes

These ‘Inconvenient’ Data Patterns Destroy the Established Coronavirus Narrative

Hollywood Celebrities and the Covid-19 Fear Campaign

Actor Wilford Brimley Dies At 85

WATCH: Arrest turns into BRAWL when anti-cop ‘protesters’ attack at ‘Back the Blue’ rally, feds SWARM

New Jersey gym owners squaring off with Gov. Murphy kick down the barricades at entrance

NY Bar Says Liquor License Suspended Over “F*CK CUOMO” Menu

Comrade Fauci: ‘There’s No Inconsistency’ in Closing Churches and Businesses, But Allowing Mass Protests

The Mortality Reporting in the MSM Related to the Coronavirus Is Overstated and Needs to be Audited – Death Rates Are Going Down Not Up

What the MSM Was Afraid to Tell You


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: Tom Cotton to IC IG: Your Evasiveness On Whether You Backdated Changes to the Whistleblower Process Borders on Criminal Obstruction
Source: Ace of Spades
URL Source: http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=383678
Published: Oct 9, 2019
Author: Ace
Post Date: 2019-10-09 20:43:58 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 298
Comments: 2

They changed the reporting requirements, then back-dated them by a month to make them seem like they'd been in force... well, for all of a month. But I guess that looks better than having them changed on the day of the fake "whistleblower's" Schiffty complaint.

Sean Davis previously reported:

In tense testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) on Friday, the inspector general for federal spy agencies refused to disclose why his office backdated secret changes to key whistleblower forms and rules in the wake of an anti-Trump whistleblower complaint filed in August, sources told The Federalist.

...

Michael Atkinson, the intelligence community inspector general, told HPSCI lawmakers during a committee oversight hearing on Friday that the whistleblower forms and rules changes were made in September, even though the new forms and guidance, which were not uploaded to the ICIG’s website until September 24, state that they were changed in August. Despite having a full week to come up with explanations for his office’s decisions to secretly change its forms to eliminate the requirement for first-hand evidence and to backdate those changes to August, Atkinson refused to provide any explanation to lawmakers baffled by his behavior.

Now Senator Tom Cotton accuses Atkinson of obstruction and demands answers about whether Atkinson leaked the Fake "Whistelblower's" Democrat ties to the House Intelligence Committee while refusing to share the same information with the Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee.

And he also wants to know if Atkinson was the source for Jake Tapper's false claim (made "without evidence") that the only "indicia of political bias" was that the fake whistleblower was a registered Democrat:

"Your disappointing testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on September 26 was evasive to the point of being insolent and obstructive," Cotton, a Republican member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), wrote on Wednesday.

Cotton said Atkinson refused to disclose to SSCI members why Atkinson initially determined the anti-Trump complainant had a partisan political bias against Trump.

"Despite repeated questions, you refused to explain what you meant in your written report by 'indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of a rival political candidate,'" Cotton wrote. "This information is, of course, unclassified and we were meeting in a closed setting. Yet you moralized about how you were duty bound not to share even a hint of this political bias with us."

"But now I see media reports that you revealed to the House Intelligence Committee not only that the complainant is a registered Democrat, but also that he has a professional relationship with a Democratic presidential campaign," Cotton continued. "I'm dissatisfied, to put it mildly, with your refusal to answer my questions, while more fully briefing the three-ring circus that the House Intelligence Committee has become."

By the way, the Fake Whistleblower's lawyer Mark Zaid denies political bias, but in a very lawyerly way:

Lawyers for whistleblower reject claims of political bias. https://t.co/Oy3pjAxs4U pic.twitter.com/PGadpnuQit— Carol Leonnig (@CarolLeonnig) October 9, 2019

Note the allegation is that this person has worked for/with a Democrat candidate.

Zaid says the guy never worked for a "political candidate, campaign, or party."

Well the thing is -- a sharp-minded friend of mine observes -- that a sitting Vice President is not a political candidate.

His read on this is that Zaid is pretty much telling us the whistleblower is a CIA agent formerly detailed to Vice President Joe Biden's national security staff.

Which might also explain why he was "visibly shaken" at the thought that his boss' actions, which might include some of his own actions, were going to be investigated.

Just speculation. But it reads as plausible to me.

By the way: Be careful what you say to Mark Zaid on twitter.

If he doesn't like it, he'll blackmail you. He'll threaten to reveal information about you that you don't want revealed unless you forgo your right to speak.

That is blackmail. You can release information about someone, and you can tell someone to do something, but you can't threaten to release information about someone unless they do something or forgo doing something.

It's the definition of the crime. Blackmail is telling someone you will release damaging information unless they do something or forgo doing something they have a right to do.

Mark Zaid should know that.

But maybe he just doesn't care, and figures that no one's going to prosecute a well-connected lawyer over a little blackmail and extortion.

Hey "Rex", why don't you reveal your identity instead of attacking someone while hiding? I'd love to have my intelligence and law enforcement clients see what they can find about your life. We can compare notes on our research efforts. What do you say? Game?— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) May 27, 2018


Poster Comment:

So they backdated the whistleblower rule change by a month to try to legitimize this very irregular and radical change in policy that formerly required whistleblowers to have first-hand knowledge/evidence of wrongdoing?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)

"Rex"

The same "Rex" who bought a house near Obama for $5.6 million?

The guy who claimed he didn't get the "autonomy" he thought he was entitled to?

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson talks with Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis before the start of a dinner with President Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House earlier this week.

(NEWSER) – Secretary of State Rex Tillerson finds dealing with the White House frustrating, and tensions boiled over Friday when he "exploded" at a White House aide, insiders tell Politico. The sources say White House officials present, including Jared Kushner, were "stunned" when Tillerson laid into presidential personnel office chief Johnny DeStefano for rejecting his picks for State Department posts. Tillerson also accused the White House of leaking damaging information about him to the media, the sources say. DeStefano's office has turned down many of Tillerson's choices for top posts either for being Democrats or for being Republicans who criticized Trump during the campaign, aides say.

The outburst from the former Exxon CEO came after disagreements with the White House on issues including Qatar, where he has tried to mediate in the dispute with other Arab nations, only to be publicly undermined by President Trump. Insiders tell the New York Times that Tillerson and Kushner are struggling for control of Middle East policy, and Tillerson is frustrated that he doesn't have the autonomy Trump promised him. "Rex is a 65-year-old guy who worked his way up from the bottom at Exxon, and he chafes at the idea of taking orders from a 38-year-old political operative," a former transition aide tells Politico of DeStefano.

https://www.newser.com/story/244997/sources-tillersons-frustration-with-white- house-exploded.html

WWG1WWA  posted on  2019-10-10   4:30:09 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: WWG1WWA (#1)

Not the same Rex IMO. Tillerson is a lot smarter than to betray Trump like that, even if he felt Trump wasn't fair to him or gave him the same respect that he's given Pompeo at State.

Tillerson was always a bookmark, someone easy to confirm. But I think Trump had Pompeo in mind for that job all along. And putting him at CIA first has become the traditional route to national security advisor and/or secretary of state. Colin Powell led the Joint Chiefs before he went that route. Condoleeza Rice was national security advisor before SoS. Panetta was Xlinton's WH chief of staff in the Nineties, Obama made him CIA chief for a few years and he became SecDef when Robert Gates retired. Robert Gates was Bush's second SecDef and was held over several years into Obama's WH years until Obama replaced him with Panetta. For that matter, Cheney was Ford's WH chief of staff, became Bush Senior's SecDef, then became Bush Junior's VP pick (after Cheney led the search committee to find a VP and apparently discovered that he himself was just the man for the job).

I'm just pointing out that the most serious players in national security are groomed through a couple of jobs over a few years and then promoted to the top jobs. And they can last through a change of administration, as we've seen at CIA and at SecDef. This is something that the two parties have apparently agreed to, maybe because they don't want so much changeover in top national security jobs.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-10   15:05:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

        There are no replies to Comment # 2.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com